Thursday, February 25, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home FCPA

Proactive Monitoring: A Sound Approach to Compliance

Compliance Strategies Under the Benczkowski Memo and New DOJ 2018 Policy Announcements, Part 5

by Jay Rosen
February 12, 2020
in FCPA, Featured
men's shoes standing at crossroads between proactive and reactive

Jay Rosen explores proactive monitoring, which demonstrates the benefits of using a third party to fulfill the compliance mandates laid out by the DOJ.

I have been looking back at some Department of Justice (DOJ) announcements over the past several years, as well as the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy, announced in November 2017, to consider what strategies companies can use based upon these documents. Over this series, I have explored what companies can do both internally and externally to incorporate the Benczkowski Memo (“the Memo”) and other DOJ guidance into their corporate compliance programs.

Here, I discuss proactive monitoring, which is directly in the wheelhouse for every compliance program’s three key prongs: prevent, detect and remediate. It is interesting to note: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said in a keynote address in late November 2018:

Money spent on an effective compliance program is “money well spent,” while the lack of such an investment is a “missed opportunity.”

When you think about it, that sort of speaks volumes to what this new guidance is all about: to help companies take a serious look at their own compliance programs.

If your organization does not have the capability to do an honest and deep program assessment, you should consider bringing in an outside third-party professional – a compliance company that is independent and neutral and does not have biases – to perform an internal review to look at a compliance program. The Idea is to bring in an outside entity with knowledge and experience.

In a nutshell, it’s proactive monitoring to avoid an imposed monitor.

The Memo and other DOJ announcements in 2018 lay out a discrete roadmap for how organizations can avoid the imposition of a monitor. The independent monitor is conflict-free, performs a comprehensive assessment and then helps lead the company through the recommended remediations. The proactive monitor is focusing the company on whatever deficiencies might exist within their program; it might be fixing the root cause problems by implementing controls and processes.

Equally importantly, the independent monitor does this over time. It can look at a company’s efforts to implement those changes and then maintain them. This is validating the efforts that the company is making to fulfill a compliance mandate.

One of the strengths of a good monitor is assessing what the company is doing and saying to determine what’s real. The proactive monitor does not come into an assignment with preconceived notions. There are no judgments or biases; it is truly is a blank slate. The words “objective” and “professional” come to mind. The independent third-party comes in without preconceived or preordained conclusions, resulting in an honest and fair assessment. So, the upside of bringing in an independent monitor is expertise, professionalism, experience and efficiency.

This final point is very much a business positive: The company itself does not have to recreate the wheel to assess itself, as the tools are already created. An outside, independent third party allows the company to continue its business while the independent third-party monitor is on the outside, looking in on the company while it continues its operations. Monitoring can be a distraction if performed internally. One of the benefits of an external monitor is that it allows the company to do its work while the expert does the assessment.

Additionally, the expertise of the independent monitor can reveal problems the company may have never even been aware of.

To conclude, I want to clearly articulate the differences between a proactive monitor and one imposed by regulators as part of an agreed settlement. A proactive monitor comes to a company not necessarily when the company is in trouble or when there is something going on, but when the company desires to assess their compliance program. Obviously, this can be an effective tool.

Conversely, an imposed monitor brings a different perspective: They are an imposed resource whose mandate is not necessarily to look at all aspects of a compliance program; usually, their mandate might be an agreed-upon or specific issue to consider.

So, while the Memo may well portend less imposed monitors, the costs for putting your organization in a position where one is mandated by the government can be quite high. Not only is the better approach to compliance a proactive approach, it is by far the more cost-effective approach. Finally, the Memo and other DOJ pronouncements in 2018 not only further articulate the DOJ’s expectations, but also demonstrates how a company can move through the enforcement process to receive a full declination under the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Program.

 


In case you missed the earlier installments of this ongoing series, please see the links below.

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Monitors But Were Afraid to Ask

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

Potential Issues in Corporate Monitorships

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

Suspension and Debarment in Monitoring

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

Monitoring in the Health Care Sector

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

The Basics of Corporate Culture

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

Monitoring in an M&A Context

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

Affiliated Monitors: 15 Years of Independent Monitoring Excellence

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

Compliance Strategies Under the Benczkowski Memo and New DOJ 2018 Policy Announcements

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4


Tags: DOJfcpa enforcement actionsmonitoring
Previous Post

Top 10 Risks for 2020

Next Post

All in the Family: Protect your Business by Avoiding These Succession Planning Blunders

Jay Rosen

Jay Rosen is Vice President, Business Development and Monitoring Specialist at Affiliated Monitors, Inc., the first company in the U.S. to focus on providing independent integrity monitoring and assessment services across a wide range of regulated industries and professions. Jay previously headed up Merrill Brink’s FCPA Investigations and Ethics and Compliance translation group. He has over eight years of experience assisting clients on cross-border investigations, as well as helping them localize their code of conduct and other mission-critical English documents for their global colleagues. For almost three years, Jay has co-hosted the #1 weekly FCPA podcast, “This Week in FCPA,” with Tom Fox. Tom and Jay recently launched a second podcast, “Popcorn and Compliance,” and Jay is also a commentator on the biweekly podcast, “Everything Compliance,” with Jonathan Armstrong, Tom Fox, Sarah Hadden, Matt Kelly and Mike Volkov.

Related Posts

woman looking at horizon from mountain top

What’s on the Horizon for Anti-Corruption Enforcement?

February 25, 2021
cannabis leaf on $100 bill

The Intersection of EDD and Banking Cannabis

February 24, 2021
gold cup award on red background with stars

Ethisphere Announces the 2021 World’s Most Ethical Companies

February 23, 2021
illustration of hand holding flashlight illuminating hidden stairs

The Corporate Transparency Act: Pulling Back the Veil

February 23, 2021
Next Post
miniature people on wooden steps, concept of succession planning

All in the Family: Protect your Business by Avoiding These Succession Planning Blunders

Access realtime data
Addressing systemic racism in the workplace SAI Global
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights