Thursday, February 25, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

What are the Fears and Concerns of Working with a Monitor?

Potential Issues in Corporate Monitorships, Part 1

by Jay Rosen
June 5, 2019
in Featured
pop art illustration of woman biting nails and thinking "oh no!"

In this ongoing series on corporate monitorships from Jay Rosen, “Mr. Monitor,” he investigates the benefits of an independent monitor, how monitors work and how various monitorships can benefit various businesses, transactions and business relationships.

There can be a wide variety of concerns for those considering or being required to work with a monitor, both from individual employees and a corporate perspective. From the corporate perspective, the concerns can include the costs of a monitorship, the impact on the bottom line, opening the books to an outsider and interference with business operations.

Concerns can be exacerbated by a fear the monitor does not understand the business of the organization or even how business is done in the real world.

Concerns that tend to bring more fear are questions about whether the monitor will engage in slow, but sure mission creep and exceed the boundary of their charge.

Monitors are Not an Extension of the Government

Many companies see monitors as an extension of the government and believe that monitors are junior G-men and investigators, tasked by the by the government to conduct ongoing investigations.

Employees tend to be afraid that a monitor will come in and exercise dictatorial powers. Employees are usually more concerned with the company’s reputation and business credibility with employees and subcontractors.

Some of the fears and concerns are understandable, particularly if a company has not had a prior positive experience with the use of an independent monitor and a monitor is assisting a company in improving their compliance program. While some of it may have to do with fear of the unknown, one concern is simply the extra costs associated with a monitor.

Monitors Should Avoid Mission Creep and the “Gotcha” Mentality

If the monitor is a part of a government settlement or resolution, there can also be the fear, sometimes driven by war stories, that monitors will have mission creep and continue the investigation, even after a resolution. A company may fear that a monitor will come in and look under every nook and cranny. This feeds into both concerns of cost and mission creep.

Another concern is that many monitors are former prosecutors and still retain a prosecutorial mindset. This can lead many companies and their employees to fear a “gotcha” mentality of a monitor who is looking for additional issues to run back to the government or regulators with throughout their monitorship investigations.

Thorough Discussions with Monitor Candidates

Most of these concerns can be handled, if not fully alleviated, through thorough discussions with monitor candidates. Among the areas a company needs to be exploring during the monitor selection process:

  • What approach is the monitor going to take?
  • What’s the approach in a meeting or an interview with a mid-level employee in a branch office?
  • Is that person going to feel as if they’re under attack, or are they brought in to explain all processes – good as well as bad – that are going on so that the monitor can make helpful recommendations?

Understand the Terms of the Resolution Agreement

In addition to the monitor interview process, companies should understand that the terms of any monitorship are set in the resolution agreement. Therefore, it is important not only to address these issues during settlement discussions, but also to take care in the drafting of such agreements to remove as many ambiguities as possible.

At times, the parties may not want to address what they believe are sensitive issues head on as part of the negotiation process; other times, there is not a full understanding of how monitors work.

In our experience, Affiliated Monitors’ personnel have been brought in as the parties are negotiating to simply educate people as to what monitors do and how they operate and to demonstrate how the monitorship can be more successful for both the government and the company.

Monitors Should Facilitate Any Ambiguities in the Monitorship

The key in drafting the resolution agreement is to lay out the scope, properly and tightly designed.

When ambiguities arise in the process of the monitor’s work, the monitor should engage with both sides as a facilitator to help the parties come together and to resolve those issues.

In conclusion, companies need to have a thorough understanding of the monitorship process, whether it is a post-resolution monitorship where the monitor is focused on the company’s compliance with its agreement in the resolution document; a deferred prosecution agreement, non-prosecution agreement or other; or a proactive monitorship. This understanding comes from discussions, reviewing and negotiating the scope of the agreement and hiring experienced monitors who understand their role and more importantly what is NOT their role going forward.

In case you missed the earlier installments of this ongoing series, please see the links below.

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Monitors But Were Afraid to Ask

Part 1: Corporate Monitorship 101: Who Are They, and What Can You Expect?

Part 2: What is a Post-Resolution Monitorship?

Part 3: What is the Power of a Pre-Settlement Monitorship?

Part 4: What Issues Should a Company Consider When Hiring a Corporate Monitor?

Part 5: How Much Will a Corporate Monitorship Cost?


Tags: monitoring
Previous Post

Securities Litigation Goes Global, and Non.-U.S. Public Companies Are Increasingly at Risk

Next Post

ESG Screening Underscores Challenges in Third-Party Risk Management

Jay Rosen

Jay Rosen is Vice President, Business Development and Monitoring Specialist at Affiliated Monitors, Inc., the first company in the U.S. to focus on providing independent integrity monitoring and assessment services across a wide range of regulated industries and professions. Jay previously headed up Merrill Brink’s FCPA Investigations and Ethics and Compliance translation group. He has over eight years of experience assisting clients on cross-border investigations, as well as helping them localize their code of conduct and other mission-critical English documents for their global colleagues. For almost three years, Jay has co-hosted the #1 weekly FCPA podcast, “This Week in FCPA,” with Tom Fox. Tom and Jay recently launched a second podcast, “Popcorn and Compliance,” and Jay is also a commentator on the biweekly podcast, “Everything Compliance,” with Jonathan Armstrong, Tom Fox, Sarah Hadden, Matt Kelly and Mike Volkov.

Related Posts

woman looking at horizon from mountain top

What’s on the Horizon for Anti-Corruption Enforcement?

February 25, 2021
cannabis leaf on $100 bill

The Intersection of EDD and Banking Cannabis

February 24, 2021
gold cup award on red background with stars

Ethisphere Announces the 2021 World’s Most Ethical Companies

February 23, 2021
illustration of hand holding flashlight illuminating hidden stairs

The Corporate Transparency Act: Pulling Back the Veil

February 23, 2021
Next Post
broken chain repaired with green string on white background

ESG Screening Underscores Challenges in Third-Party Risk Management

Access realtime data
Addressing systemic racism in the workplace SAI Global
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights