No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

What’s the Plan? – Planning a Post-Acquisition Merger Strategy

Monitoring in an M&A Context, Part 3

by Jay Rosen
November 6, 2019
in Featured, Risk
concept of merger, shadow of multiple pawns creating a king's crown

How should you plan your post-acquisition merger strategy? Jay Rosen continues his series on monitoring in an M&A context with this exploration of how to strategize the merger following an acquisition.

To plan your post-acquisition merger strategy, first you should start with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the information contained in various resolution documents on the DOJ’s website. These documents stress that an acquiring entity apply or ascertain that its code of conduct, policies and procedures regarding corruption are consistent with the acquired company’s policies and processes.

If they are not consistent, the acquiring company should apply its code of conduct and anti-corruption policies and procedures to the newly acquired company within 18 months or “as quickly as is practicable.”

Employees from the newly acquired entity must be trained on their new code of conduct and policies and procedures. There must also be a forensic audit to see if any FCPA issues pop up. This same language was brought forward into the 2012 FCPA Guidance.

All these requirements were clarified in the 2017 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs, which outlined the following manner to think through the issues involved:

Due Diligence Process – Was the misconduct or the risk of misconduct identified during due diligence? Who conducted the risk review for the acquired/merged entities, and how was it done? What has been the M&A due diligence process generally?

Integration in the M&A Process – How has the compliance function been integrated into the merger, acquisition and integration process?

Process Connecting Due Diligence to Implementation – What has been the company’s process for tracking and remediating misconduct or misconduct risks identified during the due diligence process? What has been the company’s process for implementing compliance policies and procedures at new entities?

These issues demonstrate that there is a continuum from pre-acquisition into post-closing and that they build on the prior steps.

From the pre-acquisition phase, you should be in position to develop your post-closing plan.

Moreover, under the recent addendum to the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy, the safe harbor advocated by practitioners such as Michael Volkov have now been memorialized in the U.S. Attorney’s Manual. This now-memorialized safe harbor makes your planning – literally from the time you identify a target through pre-acquisition to closing and into integration, investigation and reporting – even more critical. The DOJ is looking for robustness of process and, of course, how you documented that process through the tenure of events.

Here are some examples of what the DOJ expects to see in a such a process: If pre-acquisition due diligence is performed correctly, it will identify risks associated with the target, and a risk assessment of that company should follow as a part of your pre-acquisition due diligence along the line to your post-acquisition to give you a roadmap of what areas of risk need to be addressed immediately.

Some of the things you would specifically look for in an integration plan are around internal controls. So, are you going to use the acquired entities’ internal controls, or are you going to put your company’s internal controls regime in place? If so, how are you going to integrate them? How are you going to address any training and awareness gaps related to the acquired company’s employees’ ethics and compliance responsibilities? Do people understand the acquiring company’s anti-corruption posture and their anti-corruption, bribery and compliance policies and procedures and all that needs to be well-documented into an integration plan?

The documentation component is crucial. If no plan is followed, it’s extremely hard to demonstrate the pre- and post-acquisition due diligence to an external entity like the DOJ.

The real issue has to do with how a company demonstrates to a government regulator that they have done everything possible to identify risk associated with corruption and misconduct.

And if misconduct is identified, has the acquirer undertaken adequate steps to inform the government and make the necessary disclosure?

Finally, let’s consider how and why an independent monitor can be useful in this process. One of the ways we’ve seen it work extremely well is to help allay some of the concerns around an acquisition. If a company utilizes an independent monitor to do an assessment proactively after that acquisition has taken place, such a third party can come in and conduct the same assessment (or a similar kind) as you would do under a government requirement.

This process allows a determination of whether there has in fact been full integration, whether employees understand their responsibilities and are comfortable reporting issues to their new managers under the combined company and the new structure, whether there have been any training gaps, whether those gaps have been completely filled and whether the company has done an adequate risk assessment of where the post-acquisition risks might lie.

This can be used to demonstrate to the DOJ (or anyone else that might be looking) that the company has performed adequate due diligence, which is exactly what they are looking for.

Please join me next week when we will consider the types of things a monitor would review to determine if a company adequately considered ethics and compliance during the M&A process.

 


In case you missed the earlier installments of this ongoing series, please see the links below.

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Monitors But Were Afraid to Ask

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

Potential Issues in Corporate Monitorships

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

Suspension and Debarment in Monitoring

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

Monitoring in the Health Care Sector

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5

The Basics of Corporate Culture

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5

Monitoring in an M&A Context

Part 1, Part 2


Tags: DOJMergers and AcquisitionsMonitoring
Previous Post

How Emerging Technologies Are Disrupting the Banking Compliance Landscape

Next Post

Sexual Harassment: Focus on Culture, Not Compliance

Jay Rosen

Jay Rosen

Jay Rosen is Vice President, Business Development and Monitoring Specialist at Affiliated Monitors, Inc., the first company in the U.S. to focus on providing independent integrity monitoring and assessment services across a wide range of regulated industries and professions. Jay previously headed up Merrill Brink’s FCPA Investigations and Ethics and Compliance translation group. He has over eight years of experience assisting clients on cross-border investigations, as well as helping them localize their code of conduct and other mission-critical English documents for their global colleagues. For almost three years, Jay has co-hosted the #1 weekly FCPA podcast, “This Week in FCPA,” with Tom Fox. Tom and Jay recently launched a second podcast, “Popcorn and Compliance,” and Jay is also a commentator on the biweekly podcast, “Everything Compliance,” with Jonathan Armstrong, Tom Fox, Sarah Hadden, Matt Kelly and Mike Volkov.

Related Posts

doj sign front

4 Practical Tips for Complying With Monaco Memo

by Jennifer Kennedy Park
January 25, 2023

Preparing for expectations under the Monaco memo is easier said than done, but Jennifer Kennedy Park, an expert in white-collar...

Danske Bank: Money Laundering at Its Finest

Danske Bank: Money Laundering at Its Finest

by Corporate Compliance Insights
January 23, 2023

Something rotten in Denmark: Unpack the $2B settlement Danske Bank made with the U.S. government DOJ, SEC Settlements & Fines...

Paul Weiss Antitrust 2023_f

Paul | Weiss State of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement

by Corporate Compliance Insights
January 23, 2023

2022 was an active year for antitrust enforcement; what will 2023 hold? Where Do We Stand in 2023? The State...

doj new front

DOJ Set to Deploy More Carrots in Corporate Enforcement

by Staff and Wire Reports
January 20, 2023

Companies accused of corporate crimes will have more incentives to disclose misconduct they uncover and cooperate with federal investigations, Assistant...

Next Post
businesswoman pushing businessman away

Sexual Harassment: Focus on Culture, Not Compliance

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT