Thursday, March 4, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

What is the Impact of Monitors?

Potential Issues in Corporate Monitorships, Part 2

by Jay Rosen
June 12, 2019
in Featured
illustration of businessman on therapist's couch

Jay Rosen continues a series on corporate monitorships, discussing the positive impact an independent monitor can have in the context of an investigation – not only on the organization, but also on the employees.

What impact can engaging a monitor have on your organization?

Many of the benefits a company experiences in working with a monitor come from answering the employees’ fears and concerns.

Many employees are intimidated by attorneys and some even feel guilty about themselves and their work, even though they have done nothing wrong. Often, employees do not feel like they can trust the company, particularly if the company does not employ the Fair Process Doctrine or institutional justice as a core value of the organization.

Employees Feel Validated

Other employees feel validated, and opening up to outsiders can be a cathartic experience. For the larger organization, the monitor can tell the company what it does not know and provide a much-needed “big picture” impact, delivering insight on how the company can be run more efficiently and profitably. The bottom line is that the benefits of using an independent monitor can be behavioral and psychological, as well as compliance-related and legal.

The impact of working with a monitor is present at several different levels. The first is very personal, at the employee level. I’ve seen this time and time again when we sit with an individual employee at various levels – it could be at a lower level or at the CEO level. The employee will feel validated and, in some ways, innocent. It sounds odd to say that, because you would think that if the company was working properly, each employee would have an opportunity to say their piece and describe observations and their experiences. Unfortunately, that is not the way the real world works when people have concerns and fears of retaliation.

Focus Groups

AMI has found that, after conducting an interview or a focus group, employees will sometimes say, “I have been wanting to say these things to somebody, but I hope this is not attributed to me. I’m not looking for you to go back to anybody and say that I said this, but I hope you will take what I have said and what others have said and make some suggestions to the company.”

The key impact from working with a monitor is that when a monitor listens, employees feel better explaining their perspective on what’s happening internally in the company.

A Truly Independent Monitor

Using a truly independent monitor – meaning a monitor who is not also the lawyer for the firm or with the company’s regular outside counsel – provides another important insight into how this works in an organization. Most employees more fully appreciate talking to outsiders who they do not interact with on a day-to-day basis, even if the monitorship is required under an enforcement action and in the in the context of a government settlement.

If the monitor makes it clear they are independent from the government, employees are more likely not only to open up, but also to appreciate the experience.

These concepts tie directly into the Fair Process Doctrine, which most generally holds that if the process is fair, people are more likely to accept undesired outcomes. An independent monitor who does not perform ongoing work with the company will certainly be perceived as being fairer. It’s just human nature.

Helping Turn the Page

This independent nature also gives the monitor the ability to impact the company by helping it turn the page on any conduct they may have gotten into trouble for in the first place. This is particularly true where a company has gone through an enforcement action and resolved the matter with the government and is now ready to move on in a positive way. Employees typically want to feel good about the organization they work for; people aspire to work for a company they can feel good about. They want to tell their spouse, to tell their children. They want to feel good when neighbors ask them who they work for.

If their company got into trouble, employees like the fact that pages are being turned and once again, they can be very proud.

Government Independence

This independence from the government also works to positively impact the work of a monitor. Although an independent monitor has an obligation to report to the government faithfully as to what we are seeing – the good, the bad and the ugly – an independent monitor is not beholden to the government. At the end of the day, companies respect us and recognize that it’s in their best interest for us to be independent. If we’re in the company’s pocket and we do whatever the company wants, the government will see right through that, and it’s not going to be a good outcome.

The positive impacts of working with a monitor can happen on many levels. Obviously, for a company that has recently concluded an enforcement action, a monitor can yield many benefits to improve the compliance program, yet some of the greatest benefits may be more behavioral and psychological for the company’s employees.

Talking to a truly independent outsider can be cathartic for employees, and the entire process can help to re-instill a sense of pride in who they are, who they work for and what the organization means.

In case you missed the earlier installments of this ongoing series, please see the links below.

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Monitors But Were Afraid to Ask

Part 1: Corporate Monitorship 101: Who Are They, and What Can You Expect?

Part 2: What is a Post-Resolution Monitorship?

Part 3: What is the Power of a Pre-Settlement Monitorship?

Part 4: What Issues Should a Company Consider When Hiring a Corporate Monitor?

Part 5: How Much Will a Corporate Monitorship Cost?

Potential Issues in Corporate Monitorships

Part 1: What are the Fears and Concerns of Working with a Monitor?


Tags: monitoring
Previous Post

Study Finds Spreadsheet Risk is Real; Businesses Are Aware of But Ignore the Risk

Next Post

The 6 Hats of the AML Officer

Jay Rosen

Jay Rosen is Vice President, Business Development and Monitoring Specialist at Affiliated Monitors, Inc., the first company in the U.S. to focus on providing independent integrity monitoring and assessment services across a wide range of regulated industries and professions. Jay previously headed up Merrill Brink’s FCPA Investigations and Ethics and Compliance translation group. He has over eight years of experience assisting clients on cross-border investigations, as well as helping them localize their code of conduct and other mission-critical English documents for their global colleagues. For almost three years, Jay has co-hosted the #1 weekly FCPA podcast, “This Week in FCPA,” with Tom Fox. Tom and Jay recently launched a second podcast, “Popcorn and Compliance,” and Jay is also a commentator on the biweekly podcast, “Everything Compliance,” with Jonathan Armstrong, Tom Fox, Sarah Hadden, Matt Kelly and Mike Volkov.

Related Posts

The facade of the SEC in Washington, D.C.

Prepare Now to Comply with SEC’s Updated MD&A and Related Financial Disclosure Requirements

March 3, 2021
Illustration representing a facial recognition technology scan of a face.

Facial Recognition Technology in the Workplace: Employers Use It, Workers Hate It, Regulation Is Coming for It

March 3, 2021
A director contemplates information at her desk.

Key Concerns for Directors in 2021: Recovery from COVID-19 Is Top Priority

March 2, 2021
woman looking at horizon from mountain top

What’s on the Horizon for Anti-Corruption Enforcement?

February 25, 2021
Next Post
The 6 Hats of the AML Officer

The 6 Hats of the AML Officer

OneTrust offers download to demonstrate privacy management leadership
Access realtime data
Addressing systemic racism in the workplace SAI Global
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence ESG fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights