No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

The Social Construction of a Scandal

Research Reveals the Media’s Power in Shaping the Perception of a Scandal

by Michael Toebe
December 9, 2019
in Featured, Risk
stack of newspapers on laptop

Do corporate execs and legal counsel truly understand the role news media plays in establishing the narrative about fault and consequences when a scandal arises? Michael Toebe offers guidance on responding well.

How significant a crisis may become with all stakeholders may have more to do with how it’s interpreted by the media and presented by it than what actually has transpired, according to two different studies.

Those findings are vital to gain an understanding of in regard to ethics, governance, compliance and, when necessary, responsive communications.

“What we find are the traditionally objective characteristics of a scandal, including the evidence of wrongdoing, in isolation, are less influential than the meanings offered by the media. This finding highlights the powerful role that meaning construction plays in determining the allocation of blame and consequences in a scandal.”

— “The Social Construction of Scandal,” Timothy R. Hannigan, Jonathan Bundy, Scott Graffin, James B. Wade, Joseph F. Porac

Translating that statement, objective characteristics of a scandal prove to be less convincing to stakeholders than what the media decides to communicate as the story.

The media decides the angle, and how it frames the story proves highly persuasive in the blame and consequences that likely will develop and endure.

This is not to say that the media doesn’t report facts, that it isn’t doing its job as watchdog; it is to say that the media can have agendas like any human, can have blind spots, can succumb to sensationalism and has the power to frame a story how it wishes, at times to align with personal beliefs or in a way that will attract more attention to a journalist’s or author’s work or to a news outlet. Not all journalists or news organizations conduct themselves in this manner. Most don’t.

Yet the profession and industry has changed – and is changing – and there are individuals and news organizations that are looking for more than news: They are looking for knockout punches.

Knowing of this very strong possibility, organizational leaders can best consider how to create improved and sufficient safeguards against adverse events that will be presented by the media as a scandal and become a crisis that can be damaging to different levels – tangible and intangible – to multiple stakeholders.

Some important questions to consider:

  • What ethical challenges are currently present in the organization, either individually or collectively?
  • Where are the risks most likely lying?
  • What are the stress points for the organization?
  • What governance and compliance weak points could exist and do exist that may be significantly increasing risk and vulnerability? Is this being examined on a regular basis in a thorough manner with receptiveness to finding the need for adjustments?
  • Is the organization overcoming common confirmation bias and “sunk costs” decision-making?

There is good news coming from a different study that might be surprising considering the current state of societal culture: According to Fleur Fransen’s paper, “The Role of Media Organizations in Framing a ‘Corporate Scandal,’” “not all corporate socially debatable activities are turning out into a corporate scandal.”

Fransen continued, however, with what should constitute a warning:

“… media outlets are often the only source of information available to most of the public and, especially with the help of framing, they have a great influence on how people think about a particular subject. This means that the way media organizations present a certain issue and the frequency of paying attention to it, can play a role in constructing corporate scandals (Puglisi & Snyder, 2011).”

Knowing this information can be helpful in crisis communications, which is best conducted by remaining poised and bypassing anger and blame and not criticizing media, but instead projecting confidence and speaking with humility and emotional intelligence to a narrative more closely aligned to the “objective characteristics” of the adversity.

w. Joseph Campbell, a professor at the School of Communication at American University in Washington, D.C., wrote in his piece, “What Happens When the Media Really Gets It Wrong,”

“… media myths are not harmless. They can, and do, have damaging consequences. Media myths also tend to grant the news media greater power and influence than they realistically exert, which distorts popular understanding about the roles and functions of journalism.”

Even when the media doesn’t get it wrong, how it frames news and opinion can lack accuracy – without much consequence for reporters or news outlets, but with strong consequences for organizational leaders and stakeholders.

The findings should illuminate what can happen. A scandal becomes a crisis. But what constitutes a scandal? The media often gets to define it, and when it does, a feeding frenzy ensues. That’s why this research should be yet another call to action.

Key Actions to Take in the Face of a Scandal

Get Together as a Team Weekly and Don’t Assume Problems Aren’t Developing

This might sound like overkill of frequency, yet this level of consistent, thorough check-in, which doesn’t have to be in person or lengthy in nature, will prove valuable.

If people’s attitudes are professional, the mission-valued, astute observations brought to the table, committed discussions conducted and clarity gained, high-level risk management is being conducted.

Conduct Regular Maintenance Checks

This is outside of the regular convening of the minds. Commit to precautionary check-ups in a manner that is serious, structured, focused, detailed and thorough. An analogy: how important is it to you that regular plane maintenance is done before you take a flight? Consider your career, job, organization and mission that plane.

Be Open-Minded to What You Don’t Know and Don’t Believe

Narrow, rigid thinking is low-level risk management. It’s also common. This can prove challenging to experienced, confident people, which is why they are susceptible to making errors. Overcoming it requires heightened self-awareness and being receptive to gaining understanding of our very natural biases that trap us, including:

Dunning-Kruger Effect: We believe we are smarter and wiser than we really are.

Confirmation Bias: An automatic tendency to only recognize specific information and evidence that verifies what we already believe.

Echo Chamber: Choosing or remaining in an environment in which we encounter only the beliefs or opinions similar to our own and being at peace about it.

Motivated Reasoning: Searching for and finding evidence to support and satisfy our emotions about a belief.

Diagnosis Bias: We attach strong labels based on our initial opinions and then struggle to ever reconsider those judgments, regardless of facts and evidence.

Bandwagon Effect: Following the crowd and not necessarily knowing why we’re doing it.

Hostile Attribution Bias: Interpreting others’ behaviors as having hostile intent, even when the behavior is ambiguous or benign. Going a step further, those exhibiting this bias consider the behavior particularly hostile toward them personally.

Reactive Devaluation: A proposal is devalued if it appears to originate from someone considered an antagonist to them.

Ask Yourself “What Don’t I Know?” “How Do I Know I’m Right?” and “What Could I Missing?” Often. Think Long and Hard and Answer Honestly and Thoroughly.

Confidence is important. Overconfidence and arrogance are liabilities. Questioning ourselves is not self-doubt, but instead putting our beliefs through important and critical testing as an act of humility and precaution.

It takes acts of wisdom, patience and stronger examination to do it, yet the benefits far outweigh the cost to ego and of potentially elevated risk.

Prioritize Adjustments and Corrections and Implement Them Thoroughly, With Follow-Up Testing

Be proactive when it comes to adjustments and corrections. Underestimating the need for them can be a mistake that turns into costly error. Do regular follow up to determine if the adjustments and corrections have problem solved well or if they again need further development.

Encourage and Support Messengers, aka Whistleblowers (Reporters)

When people risk their psychological safety and professional and personal well-being by coming forward, recognize that sacrifice and value the offering they bring because it just might save you conflict, scandal and crisis and the multiple tangible and intangible costs.

NAVEX Global CCO Carrie Penman recently shared her professional recommendation on CCI in the piece, “It’s Time to Reconsider the Term ‘Whistleblower’” to replace the term whistleblower and its negative connotation with a less inflammatory one: reporter.

Reporters are watch guards for your best interests. See and value them that way.

Work on Your Reputation Daily so You Increase the Likelihood of Earning the Benefit of the Doubt

Many don’t think sufficiently about their reputation until they desperately need it to be strong. Every act, internal to the organization and external, is a reputation builder or forfeiture. Build that capital daily. See that task as trust, credibility, insurance and risk management. Learn that it increases the benefit of the doubt for you as well when your reputation is strong.

“Among people who trust a company a great deal, more than half (59 percent) say they would definitely give that company the benefit of the doubt in a crisis. Among people who are feel neutral toward a company, that percentage shrinks to just 10 percent.”

— Ipsos Corporate Reputation, The Link Between Trust, Risk and Benefit of the Doubt

Be Understanding of the Media and Their Jobs and Engage Them with Increased Access, Humility and Forthrightness

We might be idealists in regard to what we believe is fair in life when it comes to scrutiny, yet we benefit most by understanding and working with reality, no matter how much we might disagree.

Having empathy for the media and the challenges of their work and deciding to engage with them in scandal by being more accessible, humble, truthful and forthright will not only impress the media; you will be seen as more trustworthy and be listened to better in telling your side of the story, and that will come across more favorably in the press and on social media, as well as in the dangerous landscape of the court of public opinion.

Your stakeholders will have greater confidence in you for your navigational skills, and you will prevent or at least better mitigate a scandal.


Tags: Communications ManagementCrisis ManagementReputation Risk
Previous Post

Ericsson Agrees to Pay Over $1 Billion to Resolve FCPA Case

Next Post

DOJ Updates FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy Again

Michael Toebe

Michael Toebe

Michael Toebe is a reputation specialist who serves individuals and organizations. He regularly writes on communication, ethics, governance, conflicts, scandal, reputation and crisis. He is the writer of Red Diamonds Essays and Reputation Specialist Essays, both on the Medium platform.

Related Posts

red flag warnings

Fostering Risk Transparency in the Organization

by Jim DeLoach
November 9, 2022

Serious risks to your company’s financial and reputational health probably aren’t going to walk up and introduce themselves. Protiviti’s Jim...

parametric insurance esg

Exploring Parametric Insurance as an ESG Authentication Tool

by Nir Kossovsky and Denise Williamee
November 9, 2022

Parametric insurance, which has long been popular in disaster recovery, is gaining steam as a proxy for proving the effectiveness...

Creating Effective Compliance Training

Creating Effective Compliance Training

by Aarti Maharaj
November 1, 2022

Build and sustain an effective compliance and ethics training program Need some guidance on developing and managing your organization’s compliance...

trade secrets

Inside Job: How Businesses Can Protect Valuable Trade Secrets

by María Amelia Calaf
October 5, 2022

A relatively new law (the Defend Trade Secrets Act) aims to give businesses a legal framework to fight against theft...

Next Post
finger over green report button on white keyboard

DOJ Updates FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy Again

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT