Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

4 Ways to Fight U.S. Stimulus Fund Fraud During a Pandemic “Perfect Storm”

Companies Should Expect Fraud Associated with Relief Funding

by Don Fancher
August 27, 2020
in Featured, Fraud
gag with dollar symbol and protection shield

Organizations that have received stimulus funding may be at significant risk for fraud, waste and abuse related to that funding. Deloitte’s Don Fancher offers guidance on how to combat that activity.

As most compliance, finance and risk professionals know, economic volatility and major disruption can create a “perfect storm” for bad actors looking for opportunities to take advantage of others. As U.S. economic stimulus funding creates an influx of money globally, bad actors have already begun to pounce and will likely continue to do so. Further, as closer attention is paid to organization financials in advance of stimulus funding awards or as the result of the current economic downturn, existing fraudulent activity is likely to be exposed.

With new and different money flowing in and out of an organization, preparing for an uptick in fraud schemes may be wise.

In fact, 51.3 percent of over 1,200 C-suite and other executives participating in a recent online poll said they expect fraud, waste and abuse schemes to increase in the next 12 months. When it comes to economic stimulus awards, the financial schemes those polled executives expect to see include improper payments (39.5 percent), financial reporting and disclosure fraud (15.2 percent), embezzlement (14.9 percent) and corruption and kickbacks (10.8 percent).

Most U.S. stimulus funding, like the CARES Act for example, comes with new regulatory compliance rules and regulators to enforce them. The government oversight and regulatory enforcement measures put into place around new U.S. stimulus funding closely mirrors that of the 2008-signed Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), meaning vigorous enforcement by multiple government entities is expected — and it’s expected to last many years.

But what can organizations do to reduce the risk they fall victim to such schemes? Being proactive is key. A lack of focus on prevention can lead to challenges during remediation following the identification of financial crime—and those challenges may be greater when stimulus funding is involved. Organizations receiving stimulus funding must maintain continued compliance and requirements set forth, or face significant consequences from regulators.

To this end, organizations should strongly consider the following actions when trying to curb fraud, waste and abuse schemes:

1. Implement Fraud Risk Assessment and Monitoring Programs

It is better to be proactive rather than reactive when monitoring for financial crimes. In today’s environment, as employees, vendors, supply chains and more work remotely, technologies such as data analytics can help monitor for these risks. While fraud risk assessment and monitoring programs typically require investment, they can often offer returns in the form of a reduction in inappropriate spend and corruption risk, as well as improved prevention and detection of regulatory violations.

2. Enhance Third-Party Due Diligence and Monitoring

Actively monitoring vendors can play a big role in fraud risk prevention anytime, not only during disruption. Conducting background checks, using risk-sensing and employing social media analytics for both new and existing vendors can be helpful even in the best of times. Of course, even after a disruption or crisis subsides, third-party due diligence and monitoring should continue. By comparing behavior patterns before, during and after something like the global COVID-19 pandemic, organizations can help identify new (and ongoing) schemes that may have otherwise gone undetected.

3. Offer Strong Oversight and Support for Current Employees

About 28 percent of polled executives mentioned earlier said they believe current employees pose the largest risk in terms of fraud, waste and abuse schemes perpetrated against organizations awarded economic stimulus funding. To help combat the possibility of employee financial crime, leadership would be well advised to begin or repeat employee training around fraud management in general – but also around U.S. stimulus funding fraud. Beyond training, playbooks with clearly defined processes and controls for stimulus funding, as well as all fraud, waste and abuse prevention and detection, can be a great employee reference tool. And, of course, tone at the top is invaluable in relaying to employees that leadership attention is being paid to proper use of company funding — whether it is government-provided or not.

4. Combat Unknown Bad Actors (Or Those with No Vendor or Employee Ties)

There are bad actors within many organizations, but there are also bad actors who are complete strangers to those organizations. In the aforementioned executive poll, nearly one-quarter of respondents expected individuals with no employee or vendor ties to perpetrate fraud, waste and abuse schemes against organizations awarded stimulus funding. These unknown parties can be detected and sometimes deterred when strong monitoring programs are in place. Again, specifically targeted analytics can help identify anomalous behaviors to help improve future monitoring efforts.

Though the “perfect storm” for financial crime is upon us, organizations can weather fraud, waste and abuse schemes in the wake of economic volatility and major disruption by taking proactive steps today to reduce later possible challenges.


Tags: Coronavirus/COVID-19due diligencemonitoringrisk assessment
Previous Post

The AMLCO, Reputation Risk and AML Scandals

Next Post

Independence of the Compliance Function: A Critical Component of the Three Lines Model

Don Fancher

Don Fancher is a Deloitte Risk & Financial Advisory principal and global forensic leader at Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP. He has more than 30 years of experience assisting clients on matters including forensic investigations, dispute consulting, intellectual property services and reorganization services. Don has also testified as an expert witness on numerous occasions in federal, state and bankruptcy courts.

Related Posts

digital cybersecurity and network protection

Vetting Vendors’ Cybersecurity

January 26, 2021
illustration of man on ladder with binoculars, 2021 outlook concept

Financial Services Compliance in 2021

January 25, 2021
illustration of mafia man in silhouette with red tie

The Mafia’s Jackpot: How Criminal Organizations are Profiting from COVID-19

January 22, 2021
illustration of videoconference, screen and speech bubbles

New Risks as COVID-19 Forces Rapid Technology Adoption

January 21, 2021
Next Post
illustration of businesswoman with superhero shadow

Independence of the Compliance Function: A Critical Component of the Three Lines Model

Access realtime data
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights