No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home FCPA

U.S. Tests New Sanctions Strategies on Russia, Venezuela

Asia-Pacific Companies Take Cover

by Wendy Wysong
February 25, 2019
in FCPA
illustration of vladimir putin, nicolas maduro, and donald trump in profile

Clifford Chance’s Wendy Wysong and Nick Turner discuss recent sanctions leveled by the U.S. against Russian and Venezuelan corporations and what the implications are for companies doing business in the Asia-Pacific region.

with co-author Nick Turner

It appears the Trump administration has decided to embrace economic sanctions as a tactical foreign policy weapon, using the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to maximize its leverage over foreign adversaries. In particular, OFAC is sanctioning major companies — United Company RUSAL (RUSAL) and Petróleos de Venezuela (PdVSA), to name just two — as a way to influence their beneficial owners and, more importantly, their home governments. What does this mean for bystanders in Asia-Pacific and elsewhere?

“Not Permanent”

What makes the OFAC’s new strategy remarkable is that the U.S. Treasury Department has accompanied the sanctions with explicit conditions for their removal, including requiring individual owners to divest or transfer control to U.S. allies (i.e., regime change).

In the first instance, RUSAL’s beneficial owner, Oleg Deripaska, a Russian businessman included in the so-called “Putin list,” was required to divest a significant portion of his holdings and take other measures in order to obtain sanctions relief for the companies. During negotiations with RUSAL from April 2018 to January 2019, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin maintained that sanctions relief would be premised on Deripaska’s relinquishing control over his companies. The OFAC lifted the sanctions on RUSAL and other Deripaska-linked companies on January 27, 2019. Deripaska, however, remains a specially designated national (SDN).

On the day after it removed RUSAL from the SDN List, January 28, 2019, the OFAC sanctioned PdVSA and other Venezuelan persons tied to the Nicolas Maduro regime. In the news release announcing the sanctions, the OFAC stated:

As with previous OFAC designations of certain Venezuelan officials and their supporters, U.S. sanctions need not be permanent. Sanctions are intended to change behavior. The United States has made it clear that we will consider lifting sanctions for those who take concrete, meaningful and verifiable actions to support democratic order and combat corruption in Venezuela, including PdVSA.

To make their intentions even more clear, three days later, on January 31, 2019, the OFAC issued FAQ 660, which states, in part:

The path to sanctions relief for PdVSA and its subsidiaries is through the expeditious transfer of control of the company to Interim President Juan Guaidó or a subsequent, democratically elected government that is committed to taking concrete and meaningful actions to combat corruption, restore democracy and respect human rights.

Similar demands were made in conjunction with the OFAC’s sanctioning of Venezuela-based television network Globovisión on January 8, 2019.

To be clear, the companies are not accused of wrongdoing, and the OFAC has always been willing to delist sanctioned companies that distance themselves from their SDN owners. And the OFAC 50 Percent Rule allows SDNs to unblock nonsanctioned companies by divesting their holdings to below 50 percent. However, the recent trend toward sanctioning companies directly and making public demands for their owners to divest is something new, and it’s worth noting.

Should I stay or should I go?

When RUSAL was sanctioned on April 6, 2018, many non-U.S. companies severed their business ties to the company in order to minimize their own exposure to OFAC risk. However, companies that stuck with RUSAL, taking comfort in the OFAC’s numerous Russia-related general licenses and extensions, had their patience rewarded when the OFAC lifted the sanctions in January 2019. To our knowledge, there are no pending enforcement cases against non-U.S. companies in relation to their business with Deripaska’s companies.

The OFAC has followed the same tack with PdVSA, issuing a slew of general licenses to ease the effects on petroleum markets from the sudden SDN designations. It is unlikely that the PdVSA sanctions will be as quickly resolved as those involving Deripaska, as national regime change is more difficult than a transfer of company shares.

Stay Sharp

There were warning signs ahead of both companies’ listings. Deripaska was among the senior Russian government officials and businessmen named pursuant to the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) months before the OFAC sanctioned him and his companies. The OFAC gradually ramped up sanctions against PdVSA following the issuance of Executive Order 13808 on August 24, 2017. In both cases, media reports speculated about the likelihood of sanctions well in advance of the OFAC’s actions.

Non-U.S. companies, especially financial institutions, should keep aware of such developments in U.S. foreign policy and “hot spots” where economic sanctions are likely to be used.

Non-U.S. companies should also focus on developing robust (but flexible) compliance policies and procedures to anticipate and respond to rapid sanctions deployments. Some good practices include:

  • Ensuring policies against business with sanctioned persons allow for case-by-case exceptions where the law permits and according to clear criteria and lines of authority.
  • Front-line staff should have clear guidance for identifying and escalating high-risk activities for immediate review by compliance and legal teams based on qualified external guidance.
  • Touchpoints to U.S. persons and the U.S. financial system should be mapped out to ensure compliance with U.S. primary sanctions where general licenses may not cover ongoing activities.
  • Senior management should be personally involved in making risk-based decisions and communicating key compliance messages to internal and external stakeholders.
  • Legal and compliance teams should keep abreast of new developments and pronouncements from U.S. officials concerning expectations for non-U.S. companies doing business with major sanctioned companies, as well as applicable general licenses, likely outcomes and timelines for the removal of sanctions.

Tags: Asia PacificDonald TrumpOffice of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)Sanctions
Previous Post

Compliance and the Blacklist/Whitelist Fallacy

Next Post

FireMon: State of Hybrid Cloud Security 2019

Wendy Wysong

Wendy Wysong

Wendy L. Wysong is a partner at Steptoe & Johnson. She served previously as a litigation partner with Clifford Chance, offering clients advice and representation on compliance and enforcement under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Arms Export Control Act, International Traffic in Arms Regulations, Export Administration Regulations, and OFAC Economic Sanctions. She was appointed by the State Department as the ITAR Special Compliance Official for Xe Services (formerly Blackwater) in 2010. Wendy combines her experience as a former federal prosecutor with the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia for 16 years with her regulatory background as the former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement at the Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce. She managed its enforcement program and was involved in the development and implementation of foreign policy through export controls across the administration, including the Departments of Justice, State, Treasury and Homeland Security, as well as the intelligence community. Wendy received her law degree in 1984 from the University of Virginia School of Law, where she was a member of the University of Virginia Law Review.

Related Posts

Paul Weiss Economic Sanctions and AML Developments 2022_f

Economic Sanctions and AML Developments

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 15, 2023

Sanctions start high and stay high 2022 Year in Review Economic Sanctions and AML Developments What’s in this report from...

mining for gold in russia

U.S. Widens Sanctions, Targets Russian Gold Production

by Michael Volkov
July 13, 2022

Russia cranked up its gold production to offset previous international sanctions; now, the U.S. and a group of international allies...

russia ukraine impact

Casualties of War: Global Conflict’s Threat to Business Is a Call to Arms for Cross-Functional Teams

by Chuck Randolph
June 22, 2022

The full extent of the war’s impact on assets and business continuity is unknown, but the time to manage elevated...

Ukraine protest outside of Congress

Biden Administration Ramps Up Enforcement of Russia Sanctions and Export Controls. Here’s What Compliance Teams Need to Know.

by Roberto Gonzalez, Jessica Carey, Rachel Fiorill and Patrick McCusker
March 11, 2022

As the people of Ukraine continue to hold out against the Russian invasion, the Biden Administration, in partnership with allies...

Next Post
FireMon: State of Hybrid Cloud Security 2019

FireMon: State of Hybrid Cloud Security 2019

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT