No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

The New Ozone Standard: How We Arrived Here and Where We’re Headed

by Peter McGrath
November 17, 2015
in Compliance
The New Ozone Standard: How We Arrived Here and Where We’re Headed

On October  1, 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency finalized its new Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) [1]  The new standard lowers the permissible level of ozone in the surface atmosphere from 75 parts per billion to 70 parts per billion.  (The EPA had examined a variety of potential new standards.  Many observers believed that the new standard would be even lower than 70 parts per billion.)

Sections 108 and 109 The Federal Clean Air Act[2] require the Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) to set national ambient air quality standards for ozone and five other pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment.  The Clean Air Act also requires the EPA to review the standards every five years to ensure they provide adequate health and environmental protection and take into account all newly developed scientific information about the pollutant and its effect on human health and the environment.[3]  The Supreme Court has held that the EPA may not consider the costs of implementing a new standard in determining what the new standard will be.[4]

Ground level ozone is not admitted directly into the air, but created by chemical reactions between oxides of nitrogen and volatile organic compounds in the presence of sunlight.  Emissions from industrial facilities and electric utilities, motor vehicle exhaust, gasoline vapors and chemical solvents are considered to be the primary sources of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds.  Ozone triggers a variety of health problems, particularly for children, the elderly and people who suffer from lung disease, particularly asthma.

Compliance with standards is determined by measuring the concentration of ozone in the ambient air around a city or region. If concentrations exceed the standard, the Clean Air Act directs EPA to declare the city or region to be a “non-attainment area,” which triggers more stringent controls on emissions of ozone precursors.[5]  Those controls, of course, make operation of industrial facilities electric utilities, motor vehicles and use of organic chemical solvents more difficult and expensive.  Assuming the operators of those facilities and equipment pass increased costs along to customers, the burdens of the lower standards could be felt across a wide range of the economy.

When EPA makes a NAAQS more stringent, the number of non-attainment areas increase, and states are required to adopt new, more stringent limitations on emissions. A more stringent ozone standard can mean new limits on major stationary sources, but also on regional transportation systems (the Clean Air Act requires that the air quality impact of highway projects and other transportation infrastructure changes be evaluated before they can receive federal funding).[6]

The EPA, after its previous periodic review in 2008, had adopted new standards that set the ambient air quality standard for ozone at 75 parts per billion.  Those standards were weaker than the Agency’s own scientists had advised.  In 2007, the EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee had stated that its members unanimously recommended that the standard be no higher than 70 parts per billion and that the EPA consider a limit as low as 60.[7]

After the Obama administration took office, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson wrote a letter to Senator Thomas Carper stating that the EPA believed aid the 2008 standards were not legally defensible.[8]  The EPA released its new draft rules in January 2010 suggesting that it would lower the limit to between 60 and 70 parts per billion.[9]  In 2011, President Obama unilaterally directed the EPA to withdraw the proposed rules as part of his effort to reduce regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty[10].

In April 2014, though, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had issued an order requiring the EPA to issue its final rule by June 30, 2015, later extended to October 1, 2015.[11]  That order resulted in the issuance of the new standard on October 1, 2015, lowering the standard to 70 parts per billion.  The new rule allows states time to implement measures to bring any non-complying areas into compliance with the standard.  Depending upon the severity of the non-containment, areas would have until between 2020 and 2037 to meet the standards.  During that time, Republican lawmakers have indicated a willingness to fight the EPA’s rule as well.  Senator James Inhofe, Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, stated he would be willing to work with his Senate colleagues to enact legislation to revoke the ozone rule.  Further, within a week, the first private lawsuit over the new ozone standard had been filed.  Murray Energy Corp. brought an action seeking to invalidate the new ozone standard.

Because the EPA, under the American Trucking doctrine above, may not consider the costs that might be associated with implementing the 70 parts per billion standard, and because the EPA’s owns scientific advisory committee believes the standard should be no higher than 70, the basis for a judicial standard is uncertain.  It appears that some legislative action would be necessary to overturn the EPA’s new standard.  Given Congressional gridlock, any such legislative action is very unlikely, at least until after the 2016 elections.

[1] 80 FR 65292, Oct. 26, 2015

[2]  42 U.S.C. §§7408, 7409

[3]  Id. The ozone standard was initially set at 125 parts per billion.   In 1997, EPA lowered the standard to 80 parts per billion.  See 40 C.F.R. § 50.10 and Part 50 App. I; 62 Fed. Reg. 38,856 (July 18, 1997)..

[4]  Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc., 531 U.S. 457 (2001)

[5]  42 U.S.C. §§7501-7511f.

[6]  42. U.S.C. §7506(c)

[7] EPA-CASAC-07-001, dated October 24, 2006, and EPA-CASAC-07-002, dated March 26, 2007

[8]  Correspondence from Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator, EPA, to Senator Thomas R. Carper, July 13, 2011, available at http://www.eenews.net/assets/2011/07/14/document_gw_03.pdf

[9] 75 FR 2938, Jan. 19, 2010

[10]  Statement by the President on the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/02/statement-president-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards

[11]  Sierra Club v. McCarthy, 14-CV-05091 YGR


Previous Post

SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower Releases 2015 Annual Report

Next Post

Meet R.I.S.K.: Why Your Next Chief Risk Officer Will Be a “Smart” Robot

Peter McGrath

Peter McGrath

September 17 - Peter McGrath headshotA frequent lecturer and author on diverse environmental issues, Peter McGrath, a member at Moore & Van Allen, brings to his wide-ranging clients extensive counseling and litigation experience with environmental issues arising in business and real estate transactions.

Related Posts

Phaxis 100 dollars

AML & KYC: Addressing Key Challenges for 2023 and Beyond

by Alex Roberto
March 16, 2023

(Sponsored) In today’s world, financial criminals are often a step ahead of regulators and financial institutions who struggle to effectively...

audit

IIA Survey: Technology Issues Widening Risk Landscape

by Staff and Wire Reports
March 15, 2023

The past year has seen internal audit staffing and budgets continue their recovery to pre-pandemic levels as organizations contend with...

Paul Weiss Economic Sanctions and AML Developments 2022_f

Economic Sanctions and AML Developments

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 15, 2023

Sanctions start high and stay high 2022 Year in Review Economic Sanctions and AML Developments What’s in this report from...

insider fraud threat

As Layoffs Continue, the Potential for Insider Fraud Is Growing. Are You Ready?

by Chris Gerda
March 15, 2023

From startups to big banks, the technology and financial services sector have already seen tens of thousands of layoffs in...

Next Post
Meet R.I.S.K.: Why Your Next Chief Risk Officer Will Be a “Smart” Robot

Meet R.I.S.K.: Why Your Next Chief Risk Officer Will Be a “Smart” Robot

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT