No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

An Overview of the New Central Securities Depository Regulation

How Impacted Organizations Can Navigate New Challenges

by Chris Magee
December 15, 2020
in Featured, Financial Services
illustration of businessman standing in front of maze

Factor’s Chris Magee illuminates a new EU regulation, discussing what organizations are impacted and what they can do to meet their compliance obligations.

The Central Securities Depository Regulation (CSDR) is a new EU regulation primarily concerned with improving securities settlement and the regulation of central securities depositories. The regulation’s core themes will be recognizable to those familiar with the existing legislation of European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), reduction of risk and increased efficiency of European markets.  As with previous pieces of regulatory reform, CSDR will affect market participants across the board, with multiple actions required to ensure compliance.

As the name suggests, CSDR is principally aimed at regulating central securities depositaries; the specialist organizations – such as Euroclear and Clearstream – who hold financial instruments in their dematerialized form, for transfer, clearing and settlement. However, the impact that will be of wider interest to market participants will be the Settlement Discipline reform, which aims to achieve greater harmonization of securities settlement across European markets. In its current form, CSDR introduces the contractual need for mandatory buy-ins (via a buy-in agent) against the failed delivery of securities:

“Parties in the settlement chain shall establish contractual arrangements with their relevant counterparties that incorporate the buy-in process requirements…” (Regulation EU 2018/1229)

Transactions in scope under CSDR include those settled through CSDs such as bonds and shares, money market instruments, units in investment funds and emissions allowances. For the mandatory buy-in regime, OTC trades in derivatives, repos and stock lending are also in scope, and OTC documentation will need to be amended to ensure regulatory compliance mandatory buy-in requirements.

CSDR is currently expected to come into force on February 1, 2022. Our view is that now is the time for planning and preparation amidst the medley of regulations financial institutions will have to tackle in the next 12 months.

The U.K. government has published a statement on which EU regulations it will implement after Brexit, which largely draws a line that will see it implement regulations in force as of December 2020, but not those which come after. That being the case, CSDR is not expected to be enshrined into English law; this of course raises the potential problem of U.K. firms having to operate with clients in a dual regime environment.

Settlement Discipline – Impact Beyond Documentation

The goal of CSDR in reducing securities settlement reaches beyond improving the operational aspects of processing and matching transactions; it goes a step further to introduce cash penalties against market participants whose transactions fail to settle on the intended settlement date. In doing so, it not only necessitates the need for a legal solution within a firm’s trading documentation, but adds complications in the front office and operational functions of market participants.

Due to the “chain” nature of transactions in the SFT world via title transfer, delivery fails are not an uncommon occurrence. Indeed, the industry trading agreements have developed over time to include carve-outs for delivery fails and mechanisms to isolate and rectify individual fails rather than collapsing an entire commercial relationship. However, the impact of a potential cash penalty on already slender profit margins on repo and securities lending transactions should not be underestimated. SFTs are often referred to as the central cog of liquidity within financial markets – a contraction of liquidity due to CSDR uncertainty would certainly be unwelcome. Significant resources will need to be committed across various departments of market participants to ensure compliance with changes to Settlement Discipline imposed by CSDR.

Who is affected?

As with existing European financial legislation, the scope of CSDR is broad and will touch all corners of financial markets, including:

  • CSDs – New authorizations required via updated licenses under CSDR. Daily reconciliation of securities received versus participant accounts. Reporting required on a single legal entity identifier (LEI) level.
  • Sell-side – Broker-dealers will naturally hold a large volume of SFTs, and as such, will also be parties to the largest number of master agreements potentially requiring legal amendment. As market makers primarily filling client orders in volume, sell-side participants are arguably at greater risk of falling on the wrong side of mandatory buy-ins and cash penalties.
  • Buy-side – Asset managers would be likely to have a more streamlined library of trading agreements with their panel of brokers and may therefore face less of an operational challenge than sell-side parties; however, remediation of SFT documentation will still be required.

There is consensus amongst the industry bodies in support for the goal of reducing the amount of settlement failures through the recalibration of Settlement Discipline under CSDR. ICMA, ISLA and ISDA – the framers of repo, securities lending and derivative master agreements respectively – have published support for these objectives. However, there has been vocal opposition to the practicalities of how this would be achieved via the mandatory buy-in provisions and use of a buy-in agent. In a September 2020 briefing note on CSDR, ICMA noted:

“…cross-industry concerns that not only is it likely to be damaging to bond market liquidity, efficiency and stability, but many requirements of the regulation potentially render the initiative unimplementable.”

This stance is in line with broad concerns expressed by ISDA and the Futures Industry Association:

“…the CSDR settlement discipline regime does not appear to have been devised with derivatives transactions in mind. Accordingly, applying the cash penalties and mandatory buy-in regimes to settlement fails arising in the context of derivatives transactions is likely to lead to unintended adverse consequences and distort the economic agreement of the parties in relation to impacted transactions.”

In particular, ISDA call attention to a circumstance where a derivative transaction which, for all intents and purposes, should sit outside the remit of CSDR, is inadvertently caught by the regulation against the intended purposes. A core risk mitigation feature of both cleared and uncleared derivatives is the exchange of variation margin, which is calculated and exchanged on a daily basis (as a minimum). Given the stability and liquidity of high-grade government bonds, such instruments are widely written into derivative contracts as acceptable collateral for variation margin. The settlement of government debt being exchanged as margin would take place at a CCP, thus unintentionally pulling transactions under an ISDA into the scope of CSDR.

Lobbying against the current form of the regulation – particularly of the use of buy-in agents – continues; however, the EU has so far stood firm with strong policy rationale. With only months to go until implementation, unless the further delay is agreed, it seems that a confirmed industry protocol or collaboratively agreed standard provisions to address the impact of CSDR in master agreements it still some way off.

The challenge facing institutions and their customers is how to manage legal remediation projects on topics such as CSDR with other regulatory obligations falling around the same timespan – particularly LIBOR and initial margin. Clearly, many institutions will need external assistance to supplement their existing teams, such as law firms, consultants and alternative providers of legal services.

Cost will be a major element, but the industry as a whole is developing more sophistication in its ability to combine different regulatory workstreams. Firms’ GMRA and GMSLA documentation is likely to be open for review at present as part of Brexit planning, LIBOR reform or BRRD; the challenge is whether firms can avoid having to separately open, review and amend agreements for each individual compliance obligation.

The more efficient model is to start reviewing and extracting data on one project, which will likely be required on other projects. For example, if your Brexit or LIBOR workstreams require you to open and review existing trading documentation, can you use that opportunity to extract key data, such as client contact details, for use on CSDR amendments or to search to see whether a LIBOR rate is referenced in those agreements? If so, can that data be stored and shared later with other project groups? And once you have that data, can you re-use it for future workstreams, such as business re-organizations and efficiency projects?


Tags: BrexitMarkets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II)
Previous Post

The 7 Principles of Ethical Leadership

Next Post

Allianz: D&O Insurance Insights 2021

Chris Magee

Chris Magee

Chris Magee is a Senior Manager and Subject Matter Expert within the Regulatory Response Team at Factor. He is a senior lawyer on legal projects for global investment banks covering Brexit planning, legal entity migrations and LIBOR interest rate reform. Chris has a depth of knowledge across financial markets trading agreements, specializing in ISDA, GMRA, GMSLA, MRA and their associated ancillary documentation. Prior to working for Factor, Chris worked within the in-house legal team at Citigroup for five years, during which time he qualified as a solicitor (England and Wales). He received a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Northumbria and completed postgraduate studies at the University of Law, London. He has nearly 10 years of experience consulting in financial services.

Related Posts

Two tightropers walk above the clouds

The Modern UK General Counsel Walks a Tightrope Between Legal and Value Creation

by Christophe Frerebeau
February 24, 2022

While global events and domestic regulation shifts continue to cause legal disruptions, UK GCs are also being asked to do...

A billboard annoucning new rules for businesses post brexit in london.

Despite Efforts at Collaboration, U.K.-E.U. Regulatory Inconsistencies Have Begun to Crop Up for Banks

by Deepali Nijhawan
October 13, 2021

While some indications have emerged of the U.K. and E.U. collaborating closely on cross-border financial regulations, post-Brexit inconsistencies have already...

black shoes on pavement with yellow arrow pointing ahead

The Top Regulatory Trends to Watch in 2021

by Rachel Woolley
February 1, 2021

Whether it’s global reforms in combatting financial crime, the impact of Brexit or the acceleration of digitalization in financial services,...

burlap sack with euro symbol on blue background

Global Financial Institution Fines for AML, Data Privacy and MiFID Rise 26% in 2020

by Corporate Compliance Insights
December 9, 2020

APAC region saw single biggest regional increase from $6.6 million in 2019 to $5.1 billion in 2020 London, Dublin, New...

Next Post
Allianz: D&O Insurance Insights 2021

Allianz: D&O Insurance Insights 2021

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT