No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

MiFID II: What’s Next for Firms

Fines Issued to Date and the Impact from COVID-19

by Edel Brophy
October 15, 2020
in Featured, Financial Services
illustration of MiFID II text surrounded by EU flag stars on globe background

MiFID II was designed to provide more protection to investors and greater transparency in Europe’s biggest capital markets. Now, two years in, what has been the impact? Fenergo’s Edel Brophy discusses fines, the affect the pandemic has had and how to navigate the changing regulatory landscape.

The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) is a legislative framework introduced by the European Union (EU) as a way to regulate its financial markets and increase transparency – an initiative which was largely driven by the advances in technological change, financial instrument innovation and lack of convergence in markets and data, alongside mistrust of the financial services sector following the 2008 global financial crisis. Now in its third year, MiFID II seeks to recalibrate to ensure that financial institutions fulfill their essential mandate in financing the real economy.

The impact of the pandemic has had a severe impact on EU Member States, which led to the European Commission mobilizing a coordinated approach in response to COVID-19 and in its communication entitled “Europe’s moment: Repair and prepare for the next generation,” the Commission outlined a recovery plan for Europe, including measures aimed at kickstarting the economy and helping private investment. In addition, COVID-19 has both highlighted weaknesses some market participants have faced since the enforcement of MiFID II and surfaced challenges organizations confront in their ability to meet the cumbersome MiFID II administrative requirements. This has resulted in National Competent Authorities (NCAs) imposing 371 sanctions and measures across Europe this year – costly sanctions totaling €1,828,802, according to a report published by The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets’ regulator.

The Impact So Far

The comparison between the 2018 and 2019 ESMA reports shows an increase in the number of Member States where sanctions and measures were applied, the total number of sanctions and measures reported and the aggregated amount of administrative sanctions imposed.

Last year, Portugal became the EU/EEA Member State that imposed the biggest volume of fines under MiFID II (€750,000). Other countries with the highest number of imposed sanctions and fines include:

  • the Czech Republic (€469,000; 15 and measures),
  • Hungary (€244,000; 75 sanctions and measures),
  • Portugal (€750,000 euros; seven sanctions and measures),
  • Bulgaria (€51,000; 22 sanctions and measures) and
  • Luxembourg (€50,000; 83 sanctions and measures).

However, most of these sanctions did not include a fine, and while the numbers may seem low, they don’t allow us to see the full picture just yet.

Regulators have noted that the quality and accuracy of reporting by financial institutional participants has been an issue; this is a result of the depth and breadth of the uplift from MiFID I to MiFID II, which was the most complex piece of regulation to affect European capital markets. Firms are under pressure to comply with not only reporting requirements under MiFID II, but also with transparency product governance and research unbundling.

This means that the enforcement processes can take considerable time to be implemented, as ESMA states in its report. Legislative requirements under MiFID at the union level permeate down and are then transposed into national “local” law. Next year, we expect to see a higher number of sanctions and fines published by ESMA, with more comparable information available, as at this stage, the enforcement process will be well-bedded down.

How Have the Regulatory Authorities Reacted?

The European Commission has adopted a legislative proposal for MiFID II in July, in which it highlights that “the rules on investments services can play a key role in promoting the recapitalisation of European companies as they emerge from the crisis.” The key objective in amending rules under MiFID II is to enable EU economies to weather and emerge from the pandemic under the best possible conditions and ensure market participants can fulfill their crucial function “financing the real economy.”

Among the changes under the proposal are “Amendments to Information Requirements” aimed at reducing some of the administrative burdens that financial institutions face, which include:

  • a phase-out of the paper-based default method for communication,
  • an exemption for eligible counterparties and professional clients from costs and charges disclosure requirements for services other than investment advice and portfolio management,
  • alleviated ex-post reporting requirements,
  • suspension of best execution reports
  • alleviated cost-benefit analysis and
  • exemption of corporate bonds with make-whole clauses from product governance.

Best Practices to Ensure MiFID II Compliance

The question becomes what can firms do in the meantime to avoid fines while navigating this evolving regulatory landscape? The answer lies in technology: Firms need to take a closer look at their existing technologies and processes and find new ways to streamline and automate to keep on top of MiFID’s exhaustive reporting requirements. To weather the pandemic, they need to leverage digitalization to manage quick, remote account opening for onboarding new clients, allowing them to transact whilst remaining fully compliant.

Furthermore, ESMA has opened a consultation paper on the Functioning of Organised Trading Facilities (OTF) for market participants to provide feedback and commentary so they can ensure they take an active role in the future of regulation. ESMA, along with the National Competent Authorities (NCAs), will also be closely monitoring the current situation and have recommended that financial market participants focus on business continuity planning, market disclosure and financial reporting during this time.

Looking Into MiFID’s Future

MiFID II has undoubtedly had a positive impact through promoting greater competition, increased transparency, tougher investor protection rules and orderly functioning markets. However, the addendum to the MiFID II framework is much needed to address a duplicitous mandate to complement the underlying principles of MiFID and address the more complex market reality we are now faced with.

Firstly, ensuring optimal market conditions for investment services – which play a critical role in promoting recapitalization of European companies – to withstand and emerge from the pandemic. Secondly, removing the operational administrative burdens financial institutions currently face that may not be strictly necessary.

Market participants will need to bring themselves up to speed with regulatory amendments to MiFID II to mobilize their operations, accommodate changes and meet their compliance requirements by leveraging technology – thus avoiding fines down the line and maintaining their reputation.


Tags: COVID-19Financial CrisisMarkets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II)
Previous Post

1touch.io Awarded by 2020 CyberSecurity Breakthrough Awards

Next Post

Research Shows Mature Data Privacy Programs Have Greater Benefits

Edel Brophy

Edel Brophy

Edel Brophy is Head of Tax and Global Regulatory Compliance at Fenergo. Edel joined Fenergo in 2019 to lead its global regulatory team with a specific focus on tax, data protection, OTC reform and investor protection. With over 20 years of financial services industry experience, Edel has worked within retail and commercial business banking, wealth management and corporate and investment banking across regulatory, governance, risk, compliance, operations and transformation functions. Edel has specialized in both prudential and conduct risk and has led large regulatory transformation programs. Edel holds an MBA, P.G. Diploma in European Studies, G.Dip Risk Management in Financial Institutions, G.Dip in Ethics and Governance and is a qualified project management (Prince 2) practitioner.

Related Posts

covid business closure insurance

Who’s on the Hook for Pandemic-Related Business Disruptions? Courts Agree, It’s Not Property Insurers.

by Crowell & Moring
February 8, 2023

We’re nearing the three-year anniversary of widespread business shutdowns in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic. In that short...

uvalde crosses

Will 2023 Bring More ‘Permacrisis’ Culture?

by Lisa Schor Babin
January 4, 2023

While 2022 had no shortage of chaotic events, ethics columnist Lisa Schor Babin shares her hopes for 2023 — and...

Hidden Threat? They Know There’s a Problem, But Companies Are Still Failing to Intercept Real-World Dangers

Hidden Threat? They Know There’s a Problem, But Companies Are Still Failing to Intercept Real-World Dangers

by Staff and Wire Reports
August 17, 2022

From climate change to the Covid-19 pandemic to hateful political rhetoric — modern society poses risks not only to the...

Eventus Awards

Eventus Named Best Market Surveillance Provider, Adding to Recent List of Honors

by Corporate Compliance Insights
August 4, 2022

Trade surveillance and market risk solution platform Eventus won its fourth major award in the past month, as its Validus...

Next Post
open padlock on red circuit board background

Research Shows Mature Data Privacy Programs Have Greater Benefits

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT