No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Governance

Illusory Promises May Derail Your Non-Competes

by Katie Connolly
September 28, 2015
in Governance
Illusory Promises May Derail Your Non-Competes

A key issue in the development or enforcement of non-compete agreements—the consideration offered to the employee in exchange for the non-compete—has been a particularly active area for courts recently. In a typical contract case, the issue of consideration is relatively straight-forward: was there an exchange of promises? But in the non-compete context, even in those jurisdictions where the law states that the adequacy of consideration is not for courts to decide, courts routinely do just that. For example, in some states like Minnesota, employers are all but certain to find themselves with an unenforceable agreement if they ask current employees to sign a non-competition agreement in exchange for only the promise of continued employment. In these jurisdictions, courts generally find that if a non-compete is offered after the initial employment offer, the employer must provide some additional promise over and above continued employment.

In Illinois, the issue of continued employment has been a particularly hot issue; there, the state and federal courts cannot seem to make a final decision on whether an employee who is offered employment in exchange for signing a non-compete must also continue to work at the employer for at least two years in order for the non-compete to be supported by adequate consideration, and therefore, enforceable. The roller coaster of decisions following the June 2013 decision, Fifield v. Premier Dealer Services—in which an Illinois appellate court held that an employee must continue to work for an employer for two years if the consideration for the non-compete agreement is the employment itself—indicates that Fifield’s holding continues to be controversial. Some federal courts within Illinois have refused to apply it, or otherwise found that it does not create a bright-line test, and there is at least one dissenting opinion in another Illinois appellate court opinion questioning whether a two-year threshold truly exists.

In Pennsylvania, a different twist on the issue of consideration for non-competes is currently pending before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The question in that case, Socko v. Mid-Atlantic Systems of CPA, Inc., is whether the inclusion of language in a non-compete agreement that, under Pennsylvania’s Uniform Written Obligations Act (UWOA), would otherwise prevent a party from challenging consideration, will suffice for consideration if the employee did not receive an additional benefit for signing a non-compete after employment commenced. If the court determines that inclusion of the UWOA language does not create consideration for non-competes, it will be yet another decision limiting an employer’s ability to establish that consideration for a non-compete exists.

But not all jurisdictions are narrowing—or considering narrowing—the range of promises that can constitute consideration for a non-compete. On April 30, 2015, the Wisconsin Supreme Court (mostly) determined that continued employment can constitute adequate consideration for a non-compete agreement. But significantly, the decision doesn’t resolve the question completely—it also states that if an employer terminates an employee shortly after signing a non-compete agreement, the contract still might not be enforceable if the employee could show, for example, that he or she was fraudulently induced into signing the agreement.

What these and other recent cases show is that the issue of what an employer promises in exchange for an employee’s promise not to compete after employment continues to evolve, jurisdiction by jurisdiction. Employers are well advised to ensure that they offer a promise in exchange for a post-employment restrictive covenant that will adequately protect their interests in the future.


Tags: Culture of Ethics
Previous Post

Digital Due Diligence

Next Post

Software Firm Ideagen Releases Latest Version of Auditing Software Pentana

Katie Connolly

Katie Connolly

September 28 - Katie Connolly headshot (400x400)Katie Connolly is an attorney with Nilan Johnson Lewis in Minneapolis. She can be reached at kconnolly@nilanjohnson.com or 612.305.7546.

Related Posts

mcds

What Charges Against Former McDonald’s CEO Can Teach Us About Investigations of Senior Officers

by Lloydette Bai-Marrow
January 18, 2023

The case of Steve Easterbrook, the former CEO of McDonald’s, is a salutary lesson in the dire consequences of failing...

workplace bullying survey

Survey: Bullying on the Rise; Gen Z Least Likely to Report Misconduct

by Staff and Wire Reports
January 12, 2023

A pandemic-era increase in workplace bullying continued in 2022, according to a report from business think-tank Ethisphere, which found that...

toxic workplace behavior

Toxic Environment: When Workplace Behavior Is Problematic But Not Illegal

by Oppenheimer Investigations Group
January 11, 2023

Though its name has origins on the playground, bullying is a very real (and risky) concern in the workplace. Morale,...

uvalde crosses

Will 2023 Bring More ‘Permacrisis’ Culture?

by Lisa Schor Babin
January 4, 2023

While 2022 had no shortage of chaotic events, ethics columnist Lisa Schor Babin shares her hopes for 2023 — and...

Next Post
Software Firm Ideagen Releases Latest Version of Auditing Software Pentana

Software Firm Ideagen Releases Latest Version of Auditing Software Pentana

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT