No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

How to Draft an FLSA-Compliant Settlement Agreement, Part 1

by Amanda Haverstick
November 6, 2015
in Compliance
How to Draft an FLSA-Compliant Settlement Agreement, Part 1

Introduction

The standard agreement templates used for settling discrimination and other types of employment cases routinely include a number of broad-based provisions designed to protect employers from all harms that a settling employee-plaintiff might possibly bring to bear in the future.  Illustrative are the waiver and release provisions in these agreements.  They typically read like an encyclopedia, chronicling and barring every conceivable claim that an employee could conjure up against the employer following settlement.  The nondisclosure provisions in these agreements are comparably all-encompassing. They regularly include kitchen-sink styled definitions of “confidential information” and make all such information off-limits to the settling employees for all future use and disclosure purposes (often with steep penalties in the event of breach).

The obvious pro-employer slant of such agreement clauses notwithstanding, they have become the norm.  Employees voluntarily agree to them as a matter of course. But however acceptable such settlement terms have become in other litigation contexts, they simply do not fly in most cases involving wage claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).[1]  Below we explain why.

Legal Backdrop

Employment law practitioners have long understood that FLSA wage claims may not be included in the waiver and release (hereinafter, “Release”) clauses of settlement agreements used to resolve cases involving employment discrimination and other non-wage-related claims.  The basis for this longstanding rule is the “uniquely protective” nature of the FLSA, under which Congress sought to prevent abuses arising from the inherently unequal bargaining power of employers vis-à-vis their employees.[2] Less well understood, however, have been the standards governing settlement agreements when FLSA wage claims are the very claims being litigated and settled.

The Second Circuit’s Landmark Dorian Cheeks Decision

On August 7, 2015, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals rendered the first Circuit Court-level decision to provide comprehensive guidance in this area in more than three decades:  Dorian Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) (“Dorian Cheeks”).  The impact of the Dorian Cheeks decision is three-fold:

  1. First, the case held, as a matter of first impression among all Circuit Courts, that absent a district court’s official approval, a privately-negotiated settlement agreement between parties to an FLSA wage claim litigation will not support a stipulated dismissal with prejudice of the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 41(a)(1).[3]
  2. Second, the decision fortified (and expanded to the Second Circuit) the majority position of Circuit Courts throughout the country: that waivers of FLSA wage claims contained in non-court approved settlement agreements are unenforceable and will not bar settling employee-plaintiff(s) from reasserting their same claims against the employer for additional consideration in the future.[4]
  3. Third – and perhaps most significant for practitioners going forward – the Second Circuit’s decision confirmed that a district court must subject a proposed FLSA settlement agreement to “exacting scrutiny” to evaluate whether it represents a “fair and reasonable” resolution of the underlying claims, before the court may properly approve the agreement.[5]

As to this third point, the Second Circuit examined the bases under which several recent district courts had rejected proposed FLSA litigation settlement agreements.  In doing so, the Second Circuit expressly endorsed these courts’ approach and concluded that their rulings “highlight[ed] the potential for abuse in such settlements, and underscore[d] why judicial approval in the FLSA setting [was] necessary.”[6]

A review of these endorsed court rulings reveals two specific settlement agreement clauses that are particularly susceptible to courts’ rejection in the FLSA litigation context:  the Release and the nondisclosure provision.  In Parts 2 and 3 of this series, we will examine recent court cases that have rejected such provisions and offer practical guidance for the drafters of future FLSA settlement agreements that will secure court approval, support a dismissal with prejudice of the underlying FLSA litigation and act as a legally enforceable bar to future FLSA claims by the same settling employee-plaintiffs.

[1] As used herein, the term “wage claims” or “claims” means allegations of unpaid minimum wages and/or overtime under 29 U.S.C. §§ 206 and/or 207, where the claims are asserted under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and involve a “bona fide” dispute – meaning a factual dispute, such as over the number of hours worked or the amounts owed for such work.  Beyond the reach of this column are DOL-sponsored wage claim waivers reached pursuant to proceedings under 29 U.S.C. § 216(c) and the additional procedural prerequisites to final litigation dismissal in FLSA collective actions and hybrid FLSA/state wage law class actions, such as notice to collective/class members, opt-in/opt-out consents, and the like – which, in the latter context, implicate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 23(e) prescriptions, and, in both contexts, would follow courts’ review and preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement under the standards discussed herein.

[2] See Brooklyn Sav. Bank v. O’Neil, 324 U.S. 697 (1945); D.A. Schulte, Inc. v. Gangi, 328 U.S. 109 (1946).

[3] FRCP 41(a)(1) provides that, subject to certain exceptions not relevant here, an action may be dismissed “without a court order” by “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties.”  The Dorian Cheeks court provided a 1945-to-present, comprehensive chronology and analysis of the lead decisions in this area, found that no Circuit Court had squarely addressed the FRCP 41(a)(1) question and established that an unapproved agreement cannot support a stipulated dismissal with prejudice in any type of FLSA litigation in the Second Circuit.  See 799 F.3d at 201-06.

[4] Dorian Cheeks, 799 F.3d at 201-03 (discussing Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1355 (11th Cir. 1982) (“Lynn’s”)); id., at 203, n.4 (citing Copeland v. ABB, Inc., 521 F.3d 1010, 1014 (8th Cir. 2008); Whiting v. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 680 F. Supp. 2d 750, 753 (D. Md. 2010), aff’d, 416 F. App’x 312 (4th Cir. 2011); Walton v. United Consumers Club, Inc., 786 F.2d 303, 306 (7th Cir. 1986)).   Although there is increasing uniformity among courts in all jurisdictions in this area – in line with the Second Circuit’s Dorian Cheeks decision, a Circuit-by-Circuit survey of all relevant cases is necessarily beyond the scope of this piece.  Employers settling FLSA wage claim cases in non-Second Circuit courts should consult with counsel knowledgeable of the most up-to-date standards in those jurisdictions before proceeding.  The Fifth Circuit has held, for example, that an agreement reached through union negotiations with an employer, involving resolution of both FLSA claims and parallel collective bargaining agreement grievances, is a legally enforceable bar to settling employees’ subsequent court-filed FLSA claims.  See Dorian Cheeks, 799 F.3d at 204 (discussing Martin v. Spring Break ’83 Prods, LLC, 688 F.3d 247 (5th Cir. 2012)).

[5] See Dorian Cheeks, 796 F.3d at 203 (quoting Lynn’s, 679 F.2d at 1355); id., at 206.

[6] Id.


Previous Post

What’s Your Compliance Plan?

Next Post

Obtaining the Full Benefit of D&O Insurance

Amanda Haverstick

Amanda Haverstick

Amanda Haverstick is Counsel in the Philadelphia office of Reed Smith LLP.  She has practiced labor and employment law for nearly 20 years, defending companies in all forms of employment litigation and providing day-to-day advice on how to avoid such litigation. A significant portion of Amanda’s practice has been dedicated to FLSA collective actions, including defending a three-week federal district court jury trial in one such action involving misclassification claims by approximately 400 retail bank managers – resulting in a full defense verdict – and successfully petitioning the United States Supreme Court for certiorari in an employer’s challenge to class certification in an Illinois state wage law action under FRCP 23(b)(3) – resulting in the High Court’s vacating the certification award.  Amanda may be contacted at ahaverstick@reedsmith.com.

Related Posts

supply chain

Only 1 in 4 Manufacturers Have High Confidence in ESG Readiness of Their Supply Chains, Survey Finds

by Staff and Wire Reports
January 27, 2023

Ever-evolving regulatory requirements, consumer demand and investor expectations are all forcing manufacturers to increase the transparency of their supply chain,...

cco pressure

Survey: CCO Pressure High, Resources Low

by Staff and Wire Reports
January 27, 2023

Too few organizations are embracing compliance culture, according to a survey by FTI Consulting and Ethico, which found that while...

growth what next

Growing Pains: Mid-Sized Auditing Firms Are Seeing an Influx of New Clients, But at What Cost?

by Jey Purushotham
January 25, 2023

The era of exponential growth among mid-tier accounting firms is upon us, driven largely by the trend of top-tier firms...

board tech purchase

Directors: Don’t Approve a Tech Purchase Without Asking These Questions

by Jean Hill
January 25, 2023

Board directors don’t need to be able to fix a broken server, but they do need basic technology competence, which...

Next Post
Obtaining the Full Benefit of D&O Insurance

Obtaining the Full Benefit of D&O Insurance

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT