No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe
Jump to a Section
  • At the Office
    • Ethics
    • HR Compliance
    • Leadership & Career
    • Well-Being at Work
  • Compliance & Risk
    • Compliance
    • FCPA
    • Fraud
    • Risk
  • Finserv & Audit
    • Financial Services
    • Internal Audit
  • Governance
    • ESG
    • Getting Governance Right
  • Infosec
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
  • Opinion
    • Adam Balfour
    • Jim DeLoach
    • Mary Shirley
    • Yan Tougas
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Governance

More Focus on ESG Means More Scrutiny, Litigation and Enforcement, Too

Misleading ESG Statements Mean Exposure to Regulatory and Litigation Risk

by Rachel Goldman, Tom Kokalas and Tim Wilkins
March 1, 2022
in Governance, Opinion, Risk
The earth is a scoop of ice cream, melting in a fallen cone on the ground.

A focus on ESG can seem tempting and, increasingly, mandatory for boards of directors. Those companies that make statements and commitments, however, should be prepared to carry through or face steep consequences. Scrutiny from regulators and stakeholders will continue to gain steam. 

Attention to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors has reached a new high water mark in recent months and many companies’ level of concern about the potential legal ramifications of ever-expanding ESG reporting and disclosure is not far behind.  An increasing focus by stakeholders on issues such as climate change and social inequities has led companies to share new information and stake out new positions.  But with those new disclosures and commitments come increases in both scrutiny and expectations.  When companies’ actions are deemed to fall short of their words, they should expect elected officials, regulators, ratings agencies, activists and investors to consider legal actions that can have profound consequences.  

While there is no sure-fire approach to preventing ESG-related criticism, lawsuits, or enforcement actions, a serious effort to ensure strong governance and rigorous support around these issues is likely to be the best defense.

Increased ESG Focus Equals Increased Litigation and Enforcement

Management and board responsibility to prioritize ESG concerns continues to increase.  For example, in his 2022 “Letter to CEOs,” Larry Fink, the chairman and CEO of BlackRock, observed that, “[m]ost stakeholders – from shareholders, to employees, to customers, to communities, and regulators – now expect companies to play a role in decarbonizing the global economy.  Few things will impact capital allocation decisions – and thereby the long-term value of [a] company – more than how effectively [CEOs] navigate the global energy transition in the years ahead.” 

In addition, commentators noted that 2021 was a very active proxy season with “record-breaking support levels for environmental proposals” and “an 100% increase in the number of environmental proposals that have passed year-over-year.”  Social proposals on board diversity, human rights in operations and supply chains, political contributions, lobbying policies and workforce diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) matters also received increased support in 2021.  

Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been paying close attention to ESG factors, both in terms of developing new mandatory disclosure rules and identifying perceived gaps between what companies say about ESG issues in their mandatory disclosures versus their voluntary reports.  By revisiting companies’ need to report on climate change consistent with 2010 draft guidance and pursuing efforts to develop new rules, it is clear that the SEC has growing expectations about companies’ efforts on ESG issues. 

In the fall of 2021, the SEC initiated what may be its most direct action to date to address ESG matters, issuing letters to a number of major publicly-traded companies reminding them of duties to disclose climate-related risks and asking detailed follow-up questions about climate-related impacts on their businesses and about differences between climate-related disclosures in their SEC filings and statements in their voluntary ESG, corporate social responsibility, or sustainability reports.  It seems certain that these inquiries will be used both to guide the SEC in its rulemaking efforts and to support enforcement actions against companies the SEC deems to have been inaccurate or misleading in their reporting. 

Regulatory enforcement by state regulators examining corporate disclosures also presents a risk factor.  Over the last decade, New York’s Attorney General has conducted several investigations utilizing the Martin Act, the state’s broad anti-fraud statute, to target companies in the energy industry.  In these investigations, the AG examined how climate and other environmental risks were analyzed internally by the company and compared those internal analyses to the company’s public-facing disclosures.  Investigators focused on whether the risks boards and management discussed behind closed doors correlated with their communications to investors and other stake holders.  Companies should anticipate scrutiny on this front as well.

Recent trends in ESG-related litigation have equally been focused on claims of false or misleading statements regarding an array of ESG issues, in both SEC filings and other public statements such as sustainability reports or marketing materials – or for failures to disclose damaging information concerning ESG.  Often litigation coincides with enforcement actions, but investor and consumer litigation in the ESG arena is also leading the way. 

As the Supreme Court recently held in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, seemingly generic statements in SEC disclosures, such as a commitment to ethics and integrity or touting “extensive procedures and controls” to identify conflicts of interest, can be actionable.  In Goldman, investors claimed the company’s statements regarding its commitments and compliance initiatives were misleading in the face of later-revealed conflicted transactions that led to significant stock-price drops.  That case remains pending but, following remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, the District Court once again certified the class of plaintiffs and allowed the case to proceed as a class action.  The lesson of Goldman is that companies should be mindful of the risks associated with  ESG statements, even if they appear generic or aspirational in nature.

It is clear that investors and the public – not just the regulators – intend to hold companies accountable for their ESG representations.  A particular focus is on greenwashing – claims alleging that a company’s environmental- or sustainability-related statements are inflated, misleading or false.  These cases typically have been based on the securities laws or consumer protection statutes. Recent examples include cases where companies have been sued for overstating the recyclability of their products, stating that their products were environmentally friendly or safe when alleged to be harmful, or overstating their sustainability practices in light of alleged environmentally harmful activities in harvesting or production processes by company vendors. 

Litigation and investigations related to corporate governance and workplace harassment issues are also on the rise.  For example, in the fall of 2021, the SEC began investigating a public company’s disclosures pertaining to allegations of workplace harassment and gender-pay issues, and whether that information should have been disclosed earlier to investors and other parties.  The agency sought documents, including minutes from board meetings, personnel files and separation agreements the company had reached with employees as well as the CEO’s communications with other senior executives regarding complaints of sexual harassment or discrimination by employees or contractors.  Notably, at the time the SEC began investigating, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing had already filed a case against the company, an EEOC investigation was pending, and a securities class action had been commenced.  

Mitigating ESG Risk with Compliance Programs and Sound Governance

Disclosures and commitments that ring false or that cannot be supported with persuasive back-up information will not only invite distrust, defeating their very purpose, but will also invite potentially serious legal action.

To mitigate risk associated with potential ESG-related claims, boards and senior management must assess their company’s ESG risk profile and consider steps to monitor and manage these risks in a manner best suited to the company.  While this approach is consistent with routine compliance reviews, ESG disclosure risks present specific challenges that require a broader look to determine whether the company is “getting it right.”  This includes understanding specific risk factors from a wide-ranging set of threats to the organization including environmental harm, supply chain, operating models and diversity and workplace issues.  If the organization can recognize signals or variances in a timely manner, it can be better prepared to address those risks.  Not only can these tools mitigate litigation risk, but early risk screening can also enhance an organization’s ability to identify and respond to ESG risks as they evolve over time.

Companies that undertake or expand public disclosure regarding ESG factors should consider evaluating whether those disclosures are accurate, not misleading, and amply supported both by robust governance processes and sound data.  Companies that wish to undertake or expand their public commitments on ESG issues should also consider carefully evaluating whether those commitments are readily achievable and can be appropriately demonstrated.  While there is no sure-fire approach to preventing ESG-related criticism, lawsuits, or enforcement actions, a serious effort to ensure strong governance and rigorous support around these issues is likely to be the best defense.  

The opinions reflected in this article do not represent the views of editors or CCI Media. 


Tags: Board Risk OversightESGSEC
Previous Post

ECI Ethics Academy Scholarship Deadline Approaching

Next Post

Abrupt Changes Hijack Our Mental Processes, But We Can Learn to Regain Control

Rachel Goldman, Tom Kokalas and Tim Wilkins

Rachel Goldman, Tom Kokalas and Tim Wilkins

GoldmanRachel Goldman is a partner and co-chair of the Bracewell’s ESG practice. She has over 25 years of commercial litigation experience in federal and state courts, advising clients in the renewable and conventional energy, construction and infrastructure, finance and private equity sectors.
KokalasThomas Kokalas is a partner in Bracewell’s government enforcement and investigations practice. He has extensive experience in responding to regulatory investigations and conducting corporate-wide reviews and risk assessments.
WilkinsTimothy Wilkins is co-chair of Bracewell’s ESG practice and the managing partner of the firm’s Austin office. He has overseen environmental compliance audits involving thousands of locations, handled hundreds of environmental audit disclosures and pioneered the development and use of US EPA’s audit policy for new owners.

Related Posts

sec building sign

What to Expect From Atkins-Led SEC

by Jaclyn Jaeger
May 6, 2025

Former Bush-era commissioner returns with mission to streamline regulations and enhance capital markets

eu flags brussels

EU’s Regulatory Retreat? The Omnibus Package’s Impact on Sustainability Reporting

by Jon Solorzano, Kelly Rondinelli and Jacob Baltzegar
April 28, 2025

Extended timelines and reduced requirements offer relief as substantial reforms remain under consideration

data abstract green purple

66% of CISOs Worry Cyber Threats Are More Advanced Than Companies’ Defenses

by Staff and Wire Reports
April 25, 2025

US business sector falling behind in adoption of renewable energy

signing deal signature

When the Ink Dries: 6 Critical Post-Transaction Areas That Make or Break M&A Success

by Jim DeLoach
April 14, 2025

Poor follow-up once the deal is closed can cause culture clashes & value erosion

Next Post
man-laid-off

Abrupt Changes Hijack Our Mental Processes, But We Can Learn to Regain Control

No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy | AI Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights