No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Looking Forward: Corporate Enforcement in a Biden Administration

Predictions for the Coming Years and a Post-Pandemic World

by Steve Spiegelhalter and Paul Fitzsimmons
January 6, 2021
in Compliance, Featured
Joe Biden on stage in front of an American flag

With Biden’s inauguration around the corner and additional political appointments on the horizon, what can corporate compliance officers and in-house counsel expect with regard to corporate enforcement under the Biden administration? Alvarez & Marsal’s Steve Spiegelhalter and Paul Fitzsimmons discuss.

In a normal presidential transition year, Washington, DC welcomes thousands of new legislators, policymakers and lawyers. The changes deeply impact Washington, as at least half of Washington looks forward to the coming years as a chance to change policy and adopt laws that reflect its worldview. Companies read the tea leaves to determine how a new regulatory agenda may impact their businesses.

2020 was an oddity by any standard – and the tea leaves don’t necessarily yield a clear reading of what’s to come.  Congress is narrowly divided; indeed, as of now, its balance is undecided. And the pandemic looms large. In March 2020, former Attorney General Barr diverted significant U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) resources to “prioritize the detection, investigation and prosecution of all criminal conduct related to the pandemic.”[1] Even the DOJ units that usually spend their time focusing on alleged corporate wrongdoing – like the DOJ’s Criminal Fraud Section – have diverted resources to pandemic-related crime. Those that have continued standard corporate enforcement have faced unprecedented challenges. Building rapport with witnesses and looking subjects and targets in the eye are time-honored features of criminal enforcement. That work is harder to do in a pandemic, when most prosecutors can’t even spend time in their offices.

Neither the pandemic nor the DOJ’s current constitution will last forever. A vaccine is coming, prosecutors and regulators will return to their offices and the business of investigation and regulation will return to normal. In the coming months, the DOJ and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will resume their standard business, even if their emphases or policies may change. Upcoming political appointments in key agencies such as the DOJ and SEC, the Treasury, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) will surely influence each agency’s enforcement priorities.

Some changes are predictable: The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is likely to become more active in the coming four years than it was in the last four, as will the enforcement of environmental statutes. Yet some will undoubtedly take us by surprise. Who would have predicted that the past four years of enforcement would have focused so heavily on opioid distribution and pandemic-related crime? And who knows what shock the next four years will bring? To paraphrase Ralph Waldo Emerson, events are in the saddle and ride mankind.

We will focus on the knowable, along with areas that impact most companies and offer some guidance most appropriate for the world in which we currently find ourselves. This article briefly addresses the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, False Claims Act, SEC enforcement and what’s to come in the realm of financial disclosures. We conclude with some thoughts on how to prepare for increased activity in each of these areas.

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)

President Trump notoriously disliked the FCPA, but his career prosecutors unabashedly continued the statute’s enforcement. Of the 10 largest FCPA resolutions in history, six were resolved under Trump’s watch – although, notably, all six cases were initiated prior to Trump’s tenure.[2] Activity under the Trump administration reflects the generally nonpartisan nature of foreign anti-corruption enforcement. FCPA enforcement originally came alive during a Republican administration and has increased at an even pace across administrations of both parties.

Much of how the DOJ and SEC will enforce the FCPA is already baked in anyhow. Over the past four years, the DOJ and SEC have accelerated the pace at which they issue FCPA-related guidance. The DOJ’s latest guidance, in June 2020, reiterated key elements of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines while offering expanded guidance for corporate compliance officers. It is unlikely that that this guidance – or the incentive structure in place for self-reporting and cooperation – will change under the Biden administration. Instead, companies can expect the DOJ and SEC to maintain their emphasis on effective corporate compliance, self-disclosure and cooperation during investigations.

Two things may change. First, a Biden DOJ may be more predisposed to impose external corporate monitorships on companies resolving FCPA and other cases. In an edict that might be interpreted to reflect a pro-business worldview, Trump’s DOJ issued a memorandum recognizing the costs of monitorships and a reluctance to impose them. A Biden DOJ Front Office is unlikely to strike the same balance on monitorships – a reality that raises the stakes for companies under investigation.

Second, the Biden administration will likely face an influx of whistleblower reports and self-reports from companies whose businesses changed and whose compliance programs were derailed by COVID-19 and the recession. Recessions lead to force reductions, and reduced employees are more likely to blow the whistle on conduct they find questionable. The SEC’s latest whistleblower report already reflects an uptick. This comes at the same time that the pandemic and economic downturn have seriously disrupted business. Companies in downturn often offer their salespeople outsized incentives to increase sales – measures that come with increased compliance risks. Many companies also altered the way they go to market, using more third parties and exposing themselves to more third-party risk. Moreover, companies often cut costs in recessions, and compliance departments must often do more with less. A simultaneous increase in compliance risks and decrease in compliance commitment could spell disaster. And it’s likely to lead prosecutors and regulators to question corporate commitment to avoiding crime.

False Claims Act (FCA)

Even before the pandemic, the FCA was on a roll. In early 2020, the DOJ announced that it recovered more than $3 billion in settlements and judgments from civil cases involving fraud and the FCA in fiscal year 2019. Of that amount, over 85 percent related to matters that involved the health care industry, including drug and medical device manufacturers, managed care providers, hospitals, pharmacies, hospice organizations, laboratories and physicians.[3]  This marks the 10th consecutive year the department’s civil health care fraud settlements and judgments have exceeded $2 billion.

Even against that backdrop, the FCA is likely headed for an impressive uptick in enforcement. The government doled out unprecedent amounts of cash in the past year: The CARES Act, Paycheck Protection Program, Federal Reserve Lending and other COVID-19-related relief have pumped over $5 trillion into the U.S. economy to help individuals and companies ravaged by the virus.[4] Federal relief dollars always presage a rise in fraud and then an effort to recoup money that went astray. This was true, for instance, after Katrina and the Gulf oil spill. Unlike Katrina and the oil spill, which were generally localized in their impact, the pandemic has impacted companies large and small from all around the country. And companies applying for federal funds faced considerable uncertainty about the duration of the pandemic, its impact on their businesses and the rules around taking federal funds to survive. Indeed, some were so worried about the strings attached to funds that they returned them.[5]

Misusing funding may carry the potential for FCA liability, since recipients are required to make certain assertions and certifications to receive loans or other financial assistance, including loan forgiveness. The DOJ’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force has also worked closely with federal, state and local governments to deter, detect, investigate and prosecute wrongdoing associated with bidding on COVID-19-related contracts, including bid rigging, price fixing and other anti-competitive misconduct.[6]

With the massive influx of federal stimulus money related to COVID-19, government contractors and funding recipients can expect the DOJ to remain vigilant in its prosecution of FCA offenses. Organizations doing business with the government or taking government funds must therefore maintain robust compliance programs that prevent, detect and correct any potential noncompliance.

SEC Enforcement & Potential Changes to Financial Disclosures

With Jay Clayton’s November 2020 announcement that he would step down from his post as SEC Chair at year end, it’s been only natural to speculate about what the SEC may prioritize under the new administration. Despite some reported criticism that Clayton’s Commission wasn’t tough enough on Wall Street, the SEC collected approximately $14 billion in various fines and agreements during his tenure, with a record $4.68 billion in 2020 alone.[7]

The SEC Enforcement Division’s annual report, issued in November 2020, summarized a year of enforcement wins despite challenges introduced by the pandemic. Director Stephanie Avakian, who announced in December 2020 that she would resign at year end, highlighted the Division’s use of proactive, risk-based analytics to identify potential misconduct, its emphasis on accelerating the pace of investigations (median of 21.6 months last year – a five-year low) and its commitment to rewarding whistleblowers and cooperative companies.[8]

The bulk of the SEC’s 405 standalone cases in fiscal year 2020 concerned securities offerings (32 percent), investment advisory and investment company issues (21 percent) and issuer reporting/accounting and auditing (15 percent) matters. The SEC also brought actions relating to broker-dealers (10 percent), insider trading (8 percent) and market manipulation (5 percent), as well as other areas, such as public finance (3 percent) and FCPA (2 percent).[9]

On November 9, 2020, new SEC amendments took effect related to disclosure requirements associated with business, legal proceedings and risk factors. It is possible that the incoming administration and its congressional allies will also use disclosure requirements to effect changes aligned to their broader agenda. For instance, Dodd-Frank ushered in disclosures related to conflict minerals. We anticipate that, at the very least, the SEC may issue prescriptive guidance for areas with emerging emphasis, such as environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards and data privacy, both of which the U.S. government is likely to take cues from more well-developed European regimes. We also expect the SEC to take a fresh look at disclosure requirements around supply chain disruption and vulnerability exposed by the pandemic.

Similarly, companies should expect additional disclosure requirements relating to their environmental impacts. The incoming Biden administration has already emphasized its focus on environmental issues. Biden’s appointments to the Office of Management and Budget and the National Economic Council both reflect Biden’s focus on the environment. Biden has also spoken about a desire to develop an Environmental and Climate Justice Division within the DOJ to complement the work of the Environment and Natural Resources Division.[10] Companies should expect significant activity in this area – disclosure-related and otherwise.

What Organizations Can Do to Prepare

As has always been the case, today’s activities are the seeds of future enforcement – or defense against enforcement. Given the pandemic’s impacts and likely changes in enforcement, in some ways, the basics have never been more important.

Refresh Your Risk Assessment

Even under the best of circumstances, many companies let too much time pass between risk assessments. But the problem now may not only be age, but significant changes in circumstance. The starting point for an effective compliance program is a regular assessment of risks facing the company. With COVID-19 continuing to impact nearly every sector and geography, and a new administration around the corner, now is an excellent time to plan and conduct your next risk assessment.

When preparing the assessment, companies should specifically account for recent changes to their business. Today, that’s likely to include supply-chain disruption and attendant workarounds, exposure to new third parties who help out in functions that employees used to fill and increased sales incentives to help companies work their way out of a weakened economy. Companies should study these issues deeply when ascertaining their risks and assessing their compliance responses.

Evaluate Your Program Against the DOJ’s Latest Guidance

The DOJ’s June 2020 revised guidance on effective corporate compliance programs stressed that an effective program should be data-driven and continuous – constantly evolving based on insights gleaned from risk assessments and identified misconduct.

Consider the extent to which your organization is utilizing available data to drive compliance-related decisions. Has your company modernized its ability to monitor third-party relationships, implemented analytics to proactively spot potential issues and considered enhancements related to its ability to identify, investigate and remediate misconduct?

Document Your Compliance Initiatives and Progress

Organizations are making great strides in the use of technology and analytics to enhance compliance efforts, but often fail to document and articulate those enhancements to government investigators. Being able to explain not only the current state of your program – but tangible enhancements you’ve made over time (e.g., increased resources and technology) – will assist you in demonstrating to government investigators that your program is effective.

Recordkeeping not only facilitates information sharing and decision-making within the company, but will prove vital in the context of an investigation. Seek regular feedback from the board and management, document action items and plans related to compliance and keep track of progress toward objectives.


[1] https://www.justice.gov/ag/page/file/1258676/download (p.2)

[2] http://fcpa.stanford.edu/total-sanction.html

[3] https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-recovers-over-3-billion-false-claims-act-cases-fiscal-year-2019

[4] https://www.covidmoneytracker.org/

[5] https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/which-companies-are-returning-their-ppp-loan-here-s-list-n1194566

[6] https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus/DOJresponse

[7] https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-284

[8] https://www.sec.gov/files/enforcement-annual-report-2020.pdf  (p.6)

[9] Ibid, p.16

[10] https://joebiden.com/environmental-justice-plan/#


Tags: DOJFalse Claims Act (FCA)SECWhistleblowing
Previous Post

Shield and TeleMessage to Deliver Direct Capture of Mobile and WhatsApp Communications

Next Post

Managing the Climate Risk Mandate

Steve Spiegelhalter and Paul Fitzsimmons

Steve Spiegelhalter and Paul Fitzsimmons

Steve Spiegelhalter is a Managing Director and North America Investigations Practice Leader of Alvarez & Marsal’s Disputes and Investigations. Steve is a former federal fraud and corruption prosecutor in the U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Fraud Section’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Unit and brings 20 years of investigative and compliance experience consulting on the entire compliance lifecycle from deal desk to post-transaction audits, focusing on managing regulatory risk or complying with government reporting obligations.
Paul Fitzsimmons is a forensic accountant and Director in Alvarez & Marsal’s Disputes and Investigations practice. Paul regularly leads teams that assist clients and their counsel in investigating diverse allegations of misconduct, including fraud, bribery and corruption, employee and vendor collusion, conflicts of interest, improper financial reporting, earnings management and insider trading, including in the context of DOJ, SEC and foreign regulatory investigations.

Related Posts

doj-flag-sculpture

Fraud Section’s 2022: A Year of Individual Accountability, Cooperation With Foreign Authorities & Pushing Compliance Programs

by Morgan Lewis
March 15, 2023

The DOJ’s Fraud Section had a banner year in 2022, posting its highest number of convictions in a single year...

Incentives to report FCPA violations greater than ever for compliance officers

New DOJ Guidance Charts a Way Forward on Ephemeral Messaging

by Mary Shirley
March 8, 2023

New guidance from the DOJ on what makes an effective compliance program should be mandatory reading for every corporate integrity...

call of duty activision

Activision Settlement Highlights Where Companies Often Go Wrong With Whistleblowers

by Katherine Krems
March 8, 2023

The SEC has long relied on whistleblowers to enforce securities law, often making it worth their while to the tune...

Robert Kennedy Justice Department building in washington DC

Slicing Up DOJ’s Half-a-Loaf Update to Corporate Enforcement Policy

by Miller & Chevalier
February 15, 2023

The DOJ's updated corporate enforcement policy continues to push companies to self-disclose potential criminal issues "at the earliest possible time"...

Next Post
green city papercut on recycled paper background

Managing the Climate Risk Mandate

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT