Wednesday, April 14, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • On-Demand Webinars
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • On-Demand Webinars
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

Why Can’t We All Just Get Along? The Untapped Potential of Collaboration Between Compliance and In-House Counsel

Michael Volkov offers a cross-function scenario that benefits risk assessment

by Michael Volkov
April 8, 2021
in Featured, Risk
Illustration of a handshake

In-house counsel and compliance both assess risk. As such, they often vie with one another. A collaboration, however, can serve to raise both up and significantly enhance a company’s risk assessment overall.

Lawyers get a bad rap – not just as the subject of lawyer jokes.  (This is not an invitation to recite lawyer jokes).  I recently wrote about the unique skills that compliance professionals possess in risk management.  CCOs are “comfortable” assessing risk, prioritizing risks and then mitigating risks based on a mitigation strategy.

A good lawyer knows the law; a clever one takes the judge to lunch. — Mark Twain

Let me add to the list. In-house counsel, among its many talents, has the ability to identify, assess and mitigate risks.

Lawyers, however, have a little different perspective. Lawyers operate with a “worst-case” scenario mindset that addresses a potential event which creates legal risks (e.g. breach of a contract, or an intervening event like an “act of god”).  In response, the lawyers will protect against that risk. They may ultimately advise a company to reject a specific business arrangement or contract, or they may recommend entering into a relationship with a third party with appropriate legal protections.

In this scenario, in-house counsel needs to learn about the specific transaction or course of action, identify the risks, consult with the in-house business representatives and then ultimately guide the company with a balancing of benefits against risks.  In doing so, in-house counsel’s assessment of risks incorporates reputational and business risks, along with standard legal risks and legal exposure to potential litigation claims.

On top of this analysis, in-house counsel is sensitive to company stakeholders, as well as government investigation and enforcement risks. In-house counsel, along with the CCO, brings together a powerful synergy where corporate risks can be considered in a holistic manner. Legal, ethical, culture, reputation and business risks can be identified, weighed and considered against the positive benefits.

In-House Counsel and Compliance Have Complementary Abilities When It Comes to Risk Assessment

In-house counsel always identifies and weighs potential litigation claims and possible government investigation and enforcement actions.  Companies are risk-averse, and rightfully so, when faced with government investigation and prosecution risks. However, in-house counsel often weighs legal risks, possible claims against the company client and the realistic likelihood of litigation.

Talented in-house counsel is able to translate these skills to advise business leaders, and in many cases, the CEO, on business strategy, risk management and C-suite leadership strategies.  In-house counsel that repeatedly points out worst-case scenarios is often ignored or has a minimized role; while successful general counsel brings a fresh and broad perspective to senior executives that incorporates sophisticated balancing of business opportunities, legal consequences and overall strategy.

General counsel and CCOs are natural partners in the corporate governance world.  Because of the positive benefits from a coordinated and compatible alliance between legal and compliance, effective partnerships between these two functions should be carefully cultivated.  Too much time is spent focused on internal turf wars. A legal and CCO partnership lifts the standing of both in the organization.  Both win from an effective partnership.

The downside of a dysfunctional legal and compliance partnership is substantial. These unworkable situations are difficult to watch and navigate.  It is such a tragic loss of a potential opportunity.  In-house counsel and compliance professionals exist for specific benefits – the power of them together, however, is much more than the sum of their parts.  If working together, in-house counsel and compliance can bring about a strong ethical culture, mitigated risks and minimal government enforcement risks.


This article was republished with permission from Michael Volkov’s blog, Corruption, Crime & Compliance.


Tags: risk assessment
Previous Post

We Asked the SEC and Others About the Impact of Standardized ESG Reporting. The Answers Were Complicated.

Next Post

SEC’S Examinations Division Issues Risk Alert on Review of ESG Investing

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlaw.com. Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

allustration of a man looking at a moon through a telescope

Periodic Reporting for Public Companies in 2021: What Lies Ahead

April 14, 2021
A view of the Veriff mobile app

Estonian Identity Verification Service Veriff Raises $69M in Series B Led by IVP and Accel

April 13, 2021
President Joe Biden.

The Biden Administration Is Ramping Up Numerous Cross-Border Enforcements. Compliance Teams Should Take Note.

April 13, 2021
ESG reporting complications symbolized by knot on leafy background

We Asked the SEC and Others About the Impact of Standardized ESG Reporting. The Answers Were Complicated.

April 8, 2021
Next Post
green plant growing on gold coin in glass jar

SEC’S Examinations Division Issues Risk Alert on Review of ESG Investing

2Behavox and CCI webinar: Power of Ai in F
OneTrust offers download to demonstrate privacy management leadership
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management culture of ethics cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence ESG fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2021 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • On-Demand Webinars
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2021 Corporate Compliance Insights