No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe
Jump to a Section
  • At the Office
    • Ethics
    • HR Compliance
    • Leadership & Career
    • Well-Being at Work
  • Compliance & Risk
    • Compliance
    • FCPA
    • Fraud
    • Risk
  • Finserv & Audit
    • Financial Services
    • Internal Audit
  • Governance
    • ESG
    • Getting Governance Right
  • Infosec
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
  • Opinion
    • Adam Balfour
    • Jim DeLoach
    • Mary Shirley
    • Yan Tougas
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home FCPA

Reading the Tea Leaves: FCPA Enforcement Trends Send Mixed Signals

CCO compliance certification requirement raises liability concerns

by Michael Volkov
June 15, 2022
in FCPA
volkov tea leaves fcpa enforcement

Though it’s taken a while to gain steam, the Biden Administration’s approach to FCPA enforcement is becoming clearer. But as compliance expert Michael Volkov explains, prognostication over what DOJ and SEC will do next may be more complicated than it seems.

In following the DOJ and the SEC’s FCPA enforcement actions, I am always reminded of the popular phrase “reading the tea leaves,” also called tasseography, a fortune-telling method based on patterns in tea sediment. Despite a slow initial year in 2021, the Biden Administration’s stamp and push on FCPA enforcement is becoming clear.

Keep in mind, DOJ and SEC officials have promised a new, tougher approach to FCPA enforcement. Change in government enforcement policies and results take time. However, no one expected the changes to take this long. In addition, the initial enforcement push has raised some interesting questions concerning the specific steps taken by enforcement officials.

In looking at the most recent FCPA enforcement actions (Stericycle, Glencore and Tenaris), there are significant new trends and some questions that need to be examined. So, let’s take stock in where we are:

Independent compliance monitors

DOJ has stressed the importance of insisting on appointment of independent compliance monitors as part of settlements where the defendant company failed to complete enhancement of its compliance program or test of its new program. As a result, DOJ has appointed independent compliance monitors in the first two settlements, Stericycle and Glencore.

Prior criminal history

DOJ stressed the importance of evaluating a company’s prior criminal and civil record. This was a controversial step because some feared this would result in unfair assessment of prior bad acts or regulatory violations as part of an FCPA resolution. To justify this new perspective, DOJ explained that it intended to focus on recidivists and understanding the corporate defendants’ prior record of conduct, whether criminal, civil or regulatory.

While DOJ’s commitment to understanding a company’s historical record is an interesting change, DOJ’s recent failure to prosecute Tenaris for its FCPA violations in Brazil raises interesting questions. DOJ officials made numerous statements that they intended to prosecute aggressively companies for violations of prior non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) and deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs). In light of Tenaris’ history, DOJ’s failure to prosecute is inexplicable.

In early June, the SEC ordered Tenaris to pay $78 million to resolve charges of bribe payments in Brazil; this came after 2011 settlements with both the DOJ and SEC related to allegations that the company paid bribes to government officials in Uzbekistan for lucrative oil and natural gas pipeline contracts. Tenaris’ agreement with the SEC was that agency’s first-ever deferred prosecution agreement. Settlements and fines in 2011 totaled about $9 million.

Given this prior record, DOJ failed to step up and stick to its word that violations of NPAs and DPAs would be aggressively prosecuted. Tenaris’ bribery activity continued into 2013, two years after the execution of the SEC and DOJ settlements.

CCO compliance certifications

DOJ and the SEC are now requiring CCO compliance certifications at the end of an independent compliance monitor term or a self-reporting term. Glencore and Tenaris included certification requirements.

CCOs have responded with relevant questions. DOJ explained that the compliance certification requirement is intended to empower CCOs within the corporate organization. That is an admirable goal, and the CCO certification requirement will certainly elevate CCO standing. However, CCOs have some concern about this approach.

Along with the empowerment, CCOs fear potential liability for false statement and obstruction of justice crimes for false certifications. DOJ’s required certification form includes attestations that facilitate false statement and obstruction of justice prosecutions of CCOs. In raising this specter, CCOs and other professionals fear that discretionary prosecutions could result in CCO prosecutions where the evidence may be ambiguous or questionable.

As a former prosecutor, I know it is one thing to rely on prosecutorial discretion as a legitimate boundary against abuse. A large percentage of federal prosecutors will act honorably and in accordance with proper principles. However, that may not be enough to alleviate legitimate CCO anxieties.

It is not so reassuring when we recall recent prosecutions that demonstrate that prosecutorial discretion is not so consistent. For example, consider the prosecution of the Boeing technical director and special counsel John Durham’s unsuccessful prosecution of Michael Sussman for false statements. In both cases, juries quickly returned with not-guilty verdicts, and individual jurors told reporters that cases should never have been brought and wasted their time.

Given these concerns, DOJ should continue to build on its strong relationship with the CCO community and address any CCO concerns. DOJ should evaluate whether some requirement for centralized review and approval of a CCO prosecution is needed to ensure consistent application of the new potential CCO liability.


Tags: DOJSEC
Previous Post

Study: 1 in 3 Major Corporations Have Ineffective Codes of Conduct

Next Post

Survey: 1 in 4 U.S. Consumers Affected by ID Theft Last Year

Michael Volkov

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlaw.com. Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

doj exterior sign

How to Use the DOJ’s ECCP to Build (or Fix) Your Compliance Program

by Susan Divers
June 5, 2025

Corporate compliance programs face increasing scrutiny as the DOJ applies its evaluation framework across industries and company sizes, from multinational...

disruption concept logs split

The Devil You Know …

by Carrie Pallardy
June 4, 2025

With compliance processes driven largely by regulatory requirements, the financial services sector could be forgiven for breathing a sigh of...

doj sign front

Assessing the Business Risks of the Trump Administration’s ‘Total Elimination’ Strategy

by José Cortina and Jennifer Christian
May 20, 2025

As cartels increasingly participate in mainstream economic activities, traditional due diligence practices become inadequate to address new material support risks

doj sign and sculpture

DOJ’s New CEP Proposes Guaranteed Declination for Some Self-Reporters

by Jennifer L. Gaskin
May 13, 2025

The Trump Administration continues reshaping its approach to corporate crime, with the DOJ issuing major revisions of its corporate enforcement...

Next Post
Survey: 1 in 4 U.S. Consumers Affected by ID Theft Last Year

Survey: 1 in 4 U.S. Consumers Affected by ID Theft Last Year

No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy | AI Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights