Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

The Apple Monitorship: Airing Dirty Laundry

by Michael Volkov
April 28, 2014
in Compliance
The Apple Monitorship: Airing Dirty Laundry

This article was republished with permission from Michael Volkov’s Corruption, Crime & Compliance.

I am married to a lovely Sicilian-born woman. One thing her family has taught me: the value of family loyalty and love.

That same principle does not apply when it comes to the relationship between the Apple monitor and Apple. In a rare public filing, the external monitor for Apple recently filed his first report with the court overseeing Apple’s antitrust compliance program as part of the e-book publishing case. A copy is here.

The dirty laundry laid out in the report is unfortunate and shows the poor performance of Apple and the Apple monitor, as well as the overseeing court.

The history of Apple and its monitor shows that the pair are not a match made in heaven and reflects a company committed to resisting court supervision and the court-appointed monitor.

Apple needs to wake up, and it better do so soon. Antitrust enforcement usually focuses on arrogant companies that acquire market power. The last victim was Microsoft, which the government successfully prosecuted in the 1990s. Going back even further, AT&T suffered from antitrust enforcement in the 1970s and 1980s.

Apple is the next company to fall under scrutiny with its e-publishing most favored nation clause and its arrogant exercise of market power. Arrogant companies tend to hire arrogant lawyers and antagonize the government and the courts. In the end, the only one who gets hurt is the arrogant company. The arrogant lawyers make a lot of money from wasted fees.

The Apple monitor’s report details how Apple resisted meetings, basic information requests and even questioned the monitor’s ability to exercise its responsibilities in the immediate aftermath of the court’s decision finding Apple liable for antitrust violations. Apple’s response to the court filing is perhaps one of most horrible examples of responsible corporate governance and leadership.

What is even more troubling, however, is the failure of the court to intervene and remedy the situation. We do not know all of the legal filing details, but hopefully the Apple monitor apprised the court as soon as it started to experience problems with its relationship with Apple.

The supervising district judge, however, has failed to uphold an important principle: no business is above the law. I know a number of federal judges who would have responded with more speed and force to Apple’s resistance to following the court’s orders. The district judge in the Apple case finally woke up and acted. Apple eventually backed down and has now begun to cooperate, several months later.

For its part, the Apple monitor tried to push Apple to obtain access to information. Apple resisted and the monitor should not have put up with Apple’s contumacious behavior for so long – it should have apprised the court and brought Apple before the judge to explain its position.

For some reason, lawyers are too cautious and believe they need a slam dunk record before seeking enforcement – that is a mistake which the monitor will have to deal with in the months to come.

Apple won the skirmish. It delayed its cooperation, diminished the monitor’s authority and undermined the district judge’s ability to enforce the rule of law.

Apple may have won the battle, but you can bet it will lose the war. Apple’s leadership is suffering from the usual mistake of an arrogant monopolist – they ignore the historical reality going back to the early 1900s: every arrogant monopolist eventually loses after the government focuses its attention on enforcement of our nation’s antitrust laws and resources.


Previous Post

New Job Interview Rules Restrict California Employers’ Ability to Question Applicants’ Background

Next Post

Reflections from a Survivor of a Corporate Train Wreck

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan

Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at [email protected].

Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

new york city skyline at sunset

The Early Days: The Birth of the Independent Monitoring Concept

December 11, 2019
job candidates awaiting inerview

An Unconventional Interview Question: “Do You Have an HR Department?”

December 5, 2019
closeup of magnifying glass on gray background

DiCianni’s Idea: How It All Got Started

December 4, 2019
woman's hand touching beam of light on digital blue screen

The Evolution of Compliance

December 3, 2019
Next Post
Reflections from a Survivor of a Corporate Train Wreck

Reflections from a Survivor of a Corporate Train Wreck

Free Downloads

OFAC whitepaper cover
Compliance Job Interview Q&A
Reputation Risk Management Research

RSS SEC Litigation News

  • Nanotech Engineering, Inc., Michael James Sweaney (also known as Michael Hatton), David Sweaney, and Jeffery Gange December 11, 2019
    SEC Obtains Asset Freeze to Halt Alleged Offering Fraud
  • Harpreet Grewal December 10, 2019
    SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Former Online Marketing Company Executive
  • Christopher Collins, et al. December 10, 2019
    Former Congressman and Two Others Settle Insider Trading Charges

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks Big Data blockchain board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management corporate culture corporate governance culture of ethics cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making Dodd-Frank DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit internet of things (IoT) KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • Audit
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • HR Compliance
  • Leadership and Career
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights