No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

Emerging Strategies in the Evolving Area of Predictive Scheduling

What Organizations Need to Know About Related Legislation

by Collin Cook and Anthony Guzman
January 17, 2020
in Featured, HR Compliance
illustration of time schedule posted on green wall

States and cities nationwide have instituted predictive scheduling laws, aiming to give employees a greater sense of certainty around their work schedule. However, with laws varying by jurisdiction, employers don’t enjoy the same level of certainty. Fisher Phillips’ Collin Cook and Anthony Guzman shed some light.

For decades, the problem of scheduling has plagued employers and employees alike. Employees prefer predictable and reliable schedules. Employers, however, need flexibility.

To address this tension, regulators throughout the United States have recently begun to insert themselves into the struggle through the passage of predictive scheduling laws that seek to strike a tenuous balance between these competing interests. Given the recent rise in the popularity of these laws, it is important for organizations to understand what these laws are, where they are most likely to be encountered and what steps they can take to make stay abreast of the most up-to-date compliance strategies.

What are predictive scheduling laws?

Predictive scheduling laws are straightforward. In short, they require employers to post employee work schedules a certain number of days in advance of when the work is to be performed. Once posted, however, employers can be penalized for making any subsequent scheduling changes.

In theory, these laws seek to balance respective interests between employers and employees — a balance that was recently addressed in the landmark California decision, Ward v. Tilly’s. Therein, the court assumed the role of the employee’s champion and explained that, from the employee’s perspective, schedule predictability was an absolute necessity that allowed employees to, among other things, plan around second jobs, make child-care arrangements, coordinate school schedules and commit to social plans. Glaringly absent from this analysis, however, was the employer’s perspective and concurrent recognition that scheduling changes and fluctuating staffing needs are often caused by unforeseeable market realities, such inclement weather, employee call outs and unposted community events.

In practice, unfortunately, legislators have expressed wide disagreement over how to address this problem, causing many jurisdictions to take wildly different approaches. For example, in New York City, certain employers are only required to post schedules 72 hours in advance, with changes thereafter being completely prohibited. In contrast, San Francisco requires employers to post schedules not less than two weeks in advance. Once posted, however, any changes require the employer to pay the affected employee anywhere between one and four hours of additional “predictability pay,” depending on how last minute the change actually was. As these examples demonstrate, the lack of a centralized model for predictive scheduling laws has created a potential minefield for employers who attempt to apply consistent scheduling practices in multiple jurisdictions.

What industries and jurisdictions have been most affected?

Since the first predictive scheduling law arose in San Francisco in 2016, other states and major U.S. cities have contributed to a precipitous rise in these laws. Places like Vermont, Oregon, New York City, Chicago, Seattle and Philadelphia have all proposed and implemented their own unique frameworks. Simultaneously, other states have actively sought to combat the rise of these practices. In the wake of San Francisco’s law, states like Arkansas, Iowa, Georgia and Tennessee quickly implemented legislation that prohibited their own major cities from enacting similar predictive scheduling laws, seeking to stifle an already emerging trend.

To date, however, the retail and hospitality industries have taken the brunt of the regulatory force, with the vast majority of predictive scheduling laws targeting these industries exclusively. As justification for this disparate treatment, legislators have pointed to the disproportionate number of low-wage workers present in these industries who, by their nature, warrant greater protection. For these employees, securing a reliable schedule through traditional means, such as direct negotiation, is far less likely. Accordingly, in these industries, employer/employee tension between scheduling flexibility and predictably is at its zenith.

Unsurprisingly, established players in these industries have already begun to feel the impact of these new scheduling strictures. For example, in September 2019, the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection filed a substantial lawsuit against certain private businesses for various compliance failures, such as:

  1. failing to meet advanced posting requirements;
  2. failing to provide “good faith” estimates of upcoming scheduled hours;
  3. failing to obtain employee consent before enacting scheduling changes; and
  4. failing to pay employees their required pay premiums when last-minutes changes did occur.

As a result, the lawsuit alleges nearly $1 million in prospective liability amidst a combination of employee restitution and state penalties — a figure that’s certainly nothing to balk at.

So, what should you do now?

Unfortunately, compliance with predictive scheduling laws is far from easy.

Although larger employers with locations throughout multiple jurisdictions tend to be the most affected, smaller employers can also find themselves in a position that requires a full overhaul of their current staffing model. Accordingly, it’s important to keep a few points in mind:

  1. Audit Your Locations. Predictive scheduling laws don’t apply to everyone. Although standards continue to evolve, in most jurisdictions, predictive scheduling laws will only apply to employers in particular industries that reach a particular size. As a result, you should first determine whether a particular location qualifies as a “covered employer” under the prevailing local standards and understand what laws apply to that specific location.
  2. Build the Infrastructure. If predictive scheduling laws do apply, you should begin to build compliance tools into the infrastructure of your human resource systems. Standardized forms of documentation for things such as “good faith estimates” of upcoming work hours, scheduling change notices, scheduling change consent forms and work schedule acknowledgements can all be helpful to have on hand. And, like most compliance efforts, documentation and data storage can be critical in staving off allegations of impropriety.
  3. Tailor Your Policies. The piecemeal framework of predictive scheduling laws throughout the country means that you may also have locations that are subject to different predictive scheduling requirements. As a result, a centralized staffing model can quickly become outdated or, even worse, a potential liability. Location-specific policy changes may need to be made, and managers may require training on how to handle staffing shortages moving forward.
  4. Consider Novel and Creative Approaches. To address the rise of these laws, several large companies have implemented the use of scheduling apps. In addition to viewing pre-posted schedules, employees can use the apps to swap shifts with fellow co-workers or even sign up for unfilled shifts in upcoming weeks. However even without apps, voluntary schedule swapping and sign-up policies are both phenomenal ways to reduce and even eliminate the need for last-minute scheduling changes, all while boosting employee morale.
  5. Avoid Related Pitfalls. No employment law exists in a vacuum, and predictive scheduling laws are no exception. Implementing predictive scheduling models will often impact other aspects of your business and, in some cases, can create unforeseen liability traps. For example, in San Francisco, forgetting to tell your payroll company to separately delineate the “predictability pay” scheduling change penalty on your employees’ wage statements could possibility saddle you with potential labor code violations if a court decides to consider it a type of “wage” — all for a simple oversight.

Conclusion

In the modern day, employment laws are changing at an ever-increasing pace. Additionally, when it comes to employment policies, there is rarely a one-size-fits-all approach, and what’s right for one company may not be right for another. As a result, it is important to keep up to date on the newest changes in both law and compliance strategies.


Tags: Wage Compliance
Previous Post

Ethical AI is Built On Transparency, Accountability and Trust

Next Post

ICA Inaugural MENA Regulatory and Financial Crime Compliance Conference Arrives in Dubai This March

Collin Cook and Anthony Guzman

Collin Cook and Anthony Guzman

Collin D. Cook is a partner with national labor and employment law firm Fisher Phillips in San Francisco. Collin defends employers in matters involving wrongful termination, discrimination and retaliation claims, as well as wage-and-hour class and collective actions. A skilled litigator, Collin defends employers against OSHA enforcement actions from inspection through litigation.
Anthony E. Guzman II is an associate attorney with national labor and employment law firm Fisher Phillips in San Francisco. Anthony represents employers in the defense of wrongful termination, discrimination and harassment claims, wage-and-hour class and collective actions and trade secret disputes.

Related Posts

Worried About FTC Crackdown on Noncompetes? Start With Assessing Your Existing Contracts.

Worried About FTC Crackdown on Noncompetes? Start With Assessing Your Existing Contracts.

by Robert Milligan
February 22, 2023

A proposal by the FTC to ban noncompete agreements in employment has been widely criticized by business groups, with the...

ftc noncompetes the scream

No Need to Scream: How to Protect Your Business in the Face of the FTC’s Proposed Noncompete Ban

by Parker Poe
February 22, 2023

The FTC has a plan it says would empower workers with an additional $300 billion in wages per year. While...

wrench with 100 dollar bills

DOJ Launches 2 Criminal Prosecutions of Illegal No-Poach and Wage-Fixing Agreements

by Michael Volkov
January 14, 2021

We've heard the warnings about criminal indictments against companies engaging in no-poach or wage-fixing agreements. Now the DOJ's Antitrust Division...

illustration of boss cutting worker's paycheck during COVID-19

Wage and Hour in the Time of COVID-19

by Maggie Spell
August 10, 2020

Shutdowns caused by COVID-19 have resulted in remote work arrangements, as well as changes to hours worked, pay and duties...

Next Post
reflection of dubai skyline in the bay at dusk

ICA Inaugural MENA Regulatory and Financial Crime Compliance Conference Arrives in Dubai This March

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT