Saturday, December 14, 2019
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home News

Smarsh Survey: Financial Firms Concerned About Mobile Communications

by Corporate Compliance Insights
June 8, 2017
in News
Smarsh Survey: Financial Firms Concerned About Mobile Communications

Seventh Annual Report Finds Organizations Spend Too Much Time Looking for Risk in Email; Not Enough Time in Mobile, IM and Social Media

FINRA Annual Conference, Washington D.C., – Smarsh®, the leading provider of information archiving solutions for compliance, e-discovery and risk management, today released its seventh annual Electronic Communications Compliance Survey Report. The survey of compliance professionals in the financial services industry shows that as the electronic communications compliance landscape becomes more complex and scrutinized, a significant number of firms are vulnerable because of gaps in their retention and oversight initiatives.

Adding to the complexity is the growing number of non-email communications options that must be retained and supervised, particularly mobile communications. In fact, mobile devices and non-email communications channels, such as text messaging, account for two of respondents’ top three overall e-communications compliance concerns. Not only were each of these concerns identified by at least half of survey respondents, but the percentages jumped significantly from 2016.

Gaps in retention and supervision programs have substantial consequences. FINRA reported 99 books and records cases in 2016, resulting in $22.5 million in fines. Compared to 2015, that represents a 423 percent increase in fines.

“Firms need to leverage new and emerging channels to communicate with their customers and stay competitive, but they’re failing to manage the risk,” said Stephen Marsh, CEO and Founder of Smarsh. “We know the outright prohibition of new communications channels simply doesn’t work. Many of the firms that have been fined had policies that attempted to prohibit the communication channel in question. Those that are most successful in managing risk are re-balancing their supervision portfolio, and strategically leveraging technology to identify risk in text messages, social media and instant messaging, in addition to email.”

Here’s Why Firms are Concerned About Mobile Communications

With mobile devices in the hands of nearly every employee these days, mobile communications are top of mind with compliance professionals. Forty-two percent of survey respondents reported that employees requested to use text/SMS messaging for business purposes — the most requested channel for business use by employees, doubling from 2016.

More than half of respondents (52 percent) identified text/SMS messaging as the type of non-email content that poses the greatest compliance risk to their organization, ahead of social media (33 percent), instant messaging (8 percent) and website content (7 percent). These concerns are validated by gaps in compliance practices and confidence when it comes to mobile communications. Among the firms that allow text/SMS messaging, almost half (48 percent) do not have a solution for retention and oversight in place.

Other Key Electronic Communications Compliance Findings

The report addresses several additional aspects of electronic communications compliance. Other key findings include:

  • Prohibiting the use of a communications channel is not an effective solution for firms. Confidence in the effectiveness of prohibition policies — and the ability to prove that employees are not using a given communications channel — is low. This confidence gap is reported by more than half of respondents for each of the top social media channels: LinkedIn (67 percent), Twitter (57 percent), Facebook (51 percent) and Instagram (52 percent).
  • Requests for content during regulatory examinations are growing in scope and diversity. While more than 90 percent of firms examined in the last year reported having to produce email, more than half had to produce website content, and requests for content from social media sites including LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook are on the rise.
  • While regulatory requirements are often the primary driver for archiving and supervision, 88 percent of respondents recognize electronic communications data can also help identify risks to the organization. More than half of respondents (59 percent) confirm that their organization uses this data to identify fraudulent activity, among other purposes, such as supporting e-discovery and HR issues, and detecting market abuse.

To download a copy of the Electronic Communications Compliance Survey Report, visit www.smarsh.com.

 About the Survey

In February and March 2017, 119 individuals in financial services with direct compliance supervision responsibilities participated in a 31-question survey designed to identify current trends and to share insight on policies and practices about the usage, retention and supervision of electronic business communications. Respondents were drawn from a wide range of firm sizes and job titles, from C-level management and chief compliance officers to compliance department staff.

Smarsh offered an incentive to respondents in the form of a charitable donation via Smarsh Full Circle (www.smarsh.com/fullcircle), its community service initiative. Questions were answered through an online survey, and the responses were collected by a third party.

About Smarsh

Smarsh® delivers a comprehensive and integrated stack of information archiving applications and services that help companies protect themselves and manage risk. Its centralized platform provides a unified compliance and e-discovery workflow across the entire range of digital communications, including email, public and enterprise social media, websites, instant messaging and mobile messaging. Founded in 2001, Smarsh helps more than 20,000 organizations meet regulatory compliance, e-discovery and record retention requirements. The company is headquartered in Portland, Oregon, with offices in New York City, Boston, Raleigh, N.C. and London.


Previous Post

TRACE: Madoff and Belfort

Next Post

Confronting Our Comfort Zones

Corporate Compliance Insights

Related Posts

ericsson logo on building exterior

Ericsson Agrees to Pay Over $1 Billion to Resolve FCPA Case

December 6, 2019
black and white image of businessman paying bribe

Former CEO of Brazilian Petrochemical Company Charged for FCPA Violation

November 20, 2019
laptop screen featuring Office 365 migration in progress

Moving Communications to the Cloud? Consider Compliance Before Migrating

November 5, 2019
man using risk management software on tablet

NAVEX Global Announces Upgrade to Lockpath Risk Management Platform

October 28, 2019
Next Post
shoe prints stepping out of comfort zone to “where the magic happens”

Confronting Our Comfort Zones

Free Downloads

OFAC whitepaper cover
Compliance Job Interview Q&A
Reputation Risk Management Research

RSS SEC Litigation News

  • John Special, Defendant, and Michael Murphy, Relief Defendant, John Kenneth Davidson December 12, 2019
    SEC Obtains $3 Million Settlement in Insider Trading Action
  • Palm Beach Atlantic Financial Group, LLC and William A. Smith December 11, 2019
    SEC Charges Florida Resident and His Corporate Entity for Fraudulent Securities Offerings
  • Nanotech Engineering, Inc., Michael James Sweaney (also known as Michael Hatton), David Sweaney, and Jeffery Gange December 11, 2019
    SEC Obtains Asset Freeze to Halt Alleged Offering Fraud

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks Big Data blockchain board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management corporate culture corporate governance culture of ethics cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making Dodd-Frank DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit internet of things (IoT) KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • Audit
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • HR Compliance
  • Leadership and Career
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights