No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Insiders Warn: Governments Are Clueless About the Money Laundering Risks They Face

World Bank report undersells risk from lack of AML reporting standards

by Richard E. Messick
May 24, 2022
in Compliance, Risk
world bank offices new york

National risk assessments (NRA) are the apparatuses used by nations to assess their exposure to threats such as financial fraud and money laundering. The World Bank has just released a report on the state of NRAs suggesting others need to learn from the practices of eight “advanced countries.” Anonymous authors plus their confidently on-the-record editor — an insider with vast experience — are unimpressed by the suggestion.

The title from a new World Bank report on money laundering risks could scarcely be blander: “National Assessments of Money Laundering Risks: Learning from Eight Advanced Countries’ NRAs.”  The content is anything but. Authored by Joras Ferwerda of Utrecht University and Peter Reuter of the University of Maryland, the report concludes that not a one of the eight money-laundering risk assessments examined, all done as the report’s title advertises by “advanced” countries, is worth a damn.

Not a one merits a passing grade from the two professors, both highly regarded money laundering experts. What’s worse, despite close to a decade of experience doing such assessments, the two find that no government seems to have learned a thing from the mistakes of others. This raises a fundamental question about the existing AML regime. How can it be effective if national authorities lack an understanding of the money-laundering risks their countries face?

All adopted an approach to risk assessment enshrined in a 2013 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidance document. This is where the problem begins, for the FATF document is inconsistent with best practice in risk assessment, as articulated by the International Standards Organization.

For example, a critical issue in conducting a risk assessment is the identification of threats. But the NRAs are all over the place when it comes to defining just what a threat is. Canada characterized money-laundering threats as any kind of group that might launder money (organized gangs or professional money launderers), while Singapore characterized specific crimes as threats.

FATF now requires that every country show a good understanding of the distribution of risks, preferably through a published NRA. Ferwerda and Reuter analyzed the national risks assessments prepared by the governments of Canada, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, the UK, and the U.S.; all are rated by the IMF as systemically important countries. And they are surely among the countries with the most sophisticated financial regulatory and research communities.

Each country relied heavily on expert opinion, solicited without any awareness of the standards of practice for eliciting expert opinion. Most provided just the broadest hints of the methodology that they used. The Netherlands was the only one that described its approach in sufficient detail that it could in principle be replicated. Finally, almost none provided what the FATF asked for, an assessment of where risks are significant and where they are modest.

Risk assessment is difficult in any field. Though there is a well-developed profession of risk assessment, each area requires adapting the methodology to that area’s unique data limitations and institutional arrangements. Money laundering is a novel field for risk assessment; data on money laundering events are hard to find.  So there is no shame in not having strong NRAs the first time around. What is harder to justify is the casualness of the exercises. Why not lay out the methods so that other countries can learn from each other’s mistakes and so that the field will develop?

One gets the sense that NRAs are simply a box-checking exercise to meet an international requirement. Most are done just before a FATF Mutual Evaluation Report, as the new FATF self-evaluation itself reports. There is little evidence that the assessments affect policy decisions, though that is the whole point of doing them. Ferwerda and Reuter suggest that the closed world of AML is part of the problem; professional risk assessors have played no role either in the development of the FATF methodology or in its operationalization at the national level.

How can the international risk-based AML strategy succeed if even the most developed countries fail to research and explain their risks well? The FATF needs to clearly explain what it expects from an NRA. A variety of research methods is healthy, but when countries are not researching the same topic and each country comes up with their own meaning of relevant terms, learning from each other is not possible. Countries must be transparent about how they analyze risks and involve risk assessment professionals so that at least the bare minimum of academic standards for analysis are met. The NRA exercise is in its early stages. There is no shame in stumbling at the starting gate, but without intervention, all will just continue to stumble.

This originally appeared on the Global Anticorruption Blog and is reprinted here with permission from the article’s editor, anticorruption consultant Richard Messick. The contributing writers for this piece requested anonymity.

Tags: AML
Previous Post

SEC Sanctions Warn Investment Firms That Good Intentions Aren’t Enough on Messaging Apps

Next Post

The Thank You Note You Never Wanted: Plaintiff’s Lawyers in Retaliation Case Send Their Best

Richard E. Messick

Richard E. Messick

Richard E. Messick consults for international organizations, development agencies, and non-governmental organizations on legal development and anticorruption issues. As an attorney in the United States he advised political parties, office holders, corporations, and political committees on campaign finance and ethics issues and represented individuals and corporations in state and federal matters involving fraud and corruption.

Related Posts

Phaxis 100 dollars

AML & KYC: Addressing Key Challenges for 2023 and Beyond

by Alex Roberto
March 16, 2023

(Sponsored) In today’s world, financial criminals are often a step ahead of regulators and financial institutions who struggle to effectively...

Paul Weiss Economic Sanctions and AML Developments 2022_f

Economic Sanctions and AML Developments

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 15, 2023

Sanctions start high and stay high 2022 Year in Review Economic Sanctions and AML Developments What’s in this report from...

money laundering concept

It Takes a Village: Preventing FinCrime Means Everybody Needs Skin in the Game

by Samar Pratt
March 15, 2023

Banks bear the brunt of consequences for financial crimes amid a huge increase in anti-money laundering fines in 2022, making...

russia sanctions

Why Russian Sanctions Require Compliance Teams to Take a Fresh Look at KYC Procedures

by Rory Doyle
February 15, 2023

The Russian invasion of Ukraine continues with no signs of a resolution, and along with the protracted conflict, the U.S....

Next Post
thanks for not succeeding700x400

The Thank You Note You Never Wanted: Plaintiff's Lawyers in Retaliation Case Send Their Best

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT