Thursday, December 5, 2019
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

Improving Board Diversity to Navigate Emerging Liability for Social Issues

4 Ways to Evolve Your Board Recruitment Metrics

by Stephanie Resnick
June 4, 2019
in Featured, Governance
concept of diversity, multicolored fingerprints

In this fourth installment on D&O liability from Fox Rothschild’s Stephanie Resnick and John Fuller, the authors explore the importance of having a diverse board to address the challenges posed by various social issues.

with co-author John Fuller

Why Is Diversity Important?

As with the social issues discussed in prior articles, diversity is quickly evolving from an aspiration for equality to a corporate necessity with an increasingly discernable impact on the bottom line.

At the organizational level, a lack of diversity along gender, racial, ethnic, sexual orientation and/or age lines can open the company to complex and unsavory litigation. For instance, tech giants have been rocked by the publication of internal memoranda regarding diversity practices and numerous lawsuits resulting from the termination of certain individuals who attacked or defended the existing corporate processes. Increased diversity and improved practices for promoting diversity can help avoid such litigation.

At the board level, recent studies have shown that diversity – in particular gender diversity – can have a direct impact on the corporate liability. For example, researcher Chelsea Liu studied 1,893 environmental lawsuits brought against 1,500 companies listed by Standard & Poor’s between 2000 and 2015. Liu found that for every additional woman on company’s board, there was approximately a 1.5 percent reduction in the risk of litigation. Liu also determined that the average environmental lawsuit cost 2.26 percent of an organization’s market value, meaning that the addition of a female board member equated to an average savings of $3.1 million of organizational value each year.

These findings support the widely accepted understandings that adding diverse perspectives to a board improves decision-making by among other things, refreshing core skill sets and challenging potentially complacent board culture.

How Can a Board Improve Diversity in Its Recruitment?

Having identified the benefits of a diverse board, the focus becomes the steps boards can take to improve diversity. Of course, there is no easy solution. However, common to many boards that find themselves lacking in diverse viewpoints is a need to critically examine – and likely change – how the board identifies and recruits board members. Below are four best practices which blend proactive efforts to change board culture with accountability metrics to help board recruitment practices genuinely evolve.

1. Boards should move toward more transparent and objective criteria for board positions that center on the identified skills the board needs.

Focusing on the skills the board needs, not the merely skills it currently provides, may force the board to re-examine how it identifies, recruits and selects potential board members.

To drive skill-based board recruitment, many boards create a skill matrix. The first step in developing a skill matrix is to critically examine the abilities of the board as whole and those of each individual member. Candid evaluations of board members’ expertise paired with surveys of what skill sets the board members feel are important (or may be lacking) can help form an objective foundation for the board’s recruitment targets. Boards may also consider soliciting shareholder input on the criteria for board membership and necessary skills to ensure that there is alignment of priorities with the stakeholders. The focus on objective skills can help the board avoid the tendency to recruit network contacts who may only be generally qualified for board service and can help board members re-examine their networks to find diverse individuals with the identified skills.

2. To further promote transparency and encourage refreshment of necessary skills, boards should undertake formal performance evaluations of the directors and officers.

Such evaluations, which can be administered in person or through a digital platform, examine the goals the board has set for itself or its committees and evaluate the performance of individual directors and officers in obtaining results. A significant benefit of evaluations is that evaluations create comparable data on which directors and officers can rely to identify, discipline and/or remove underperforming directors and officers. Having performance data in hand can be particularly valuable where prevailing board culture may have permitted underperforming directors and officers to remain. Evaluations, possibly in concert with board term limits, help create a board culture that is constantly looking to the future, not merely looking to the directors and officers currently across the table.

3. When the time comes to replace directors and officers, boards should avoid the tendency to replace “like for like.”

One of the significant benefits of a diverse board is that a variety of perspectives prepares the board to meet new and evolving challenges, like those posed by social issues. Far too often, however, even if using a skills matrix, the board will instinctively replace an existing director with an individual with similar experience. The board should use a vacancy in the board to evaluate whether the skills possessed by the departing board member are adequately represented by other directors and officers and, if so, determine what other identified skills should be priorities when filling the position.

4. The board must actively develop a pipeline of diverse board candidates who possess the skills and new perspectives that will serve the board into the future.

Trainings about unconscious bias and other forms of discrimination that pervade the corporate world are undoubtedly beneficial to any organization. Boards, however, should take special care not only to foster an inclusive culture in the boardroom, but must create opportunities to connect with and mentor potential board members. This means looking beyond C-Suite executives and existing business contacts to find individuals who offer genuinely diverse perspectives, but may not have been afforded the opportunity to amass experience through board service.

A diverse set of qualifications and perspectives will enhance any board. With ongoing refreshment and a commitment to developing the next generation of board members, the board will continue to reflect changing demographics and shareholders’ increasing demand for socially responsible corporate governance.


Read the authors’ previous articles on how social issues such as sexual harassment in the #MeToo era, digital privacy and demands for environmental sustainability are manifesting in shareholder lawsuits and shaping the fiduciary duties that officers and directors owe to their organizations.


Tags: board compositionboard of directorsdecision-makingdiversity
Previous Post

When it Comes to Ethics & Compliance, Don’t Just Train… Advertise!

Next Post

Innovation: The Organization’s Lifeblood

Stephanie Resnick

Stephanie Resnick is the Office Managing Partner of the firm’s Philadelphia office and is Chair of the Directors’ & Officers’ Liability & Corporate Governance Practice Group. She is consistently ranked among the top business trial lawyers both regionally and nationally and is lauded by her colleagues and peers for her strategic handling of high-stakes, complex business disputes in the federal and state courts of Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey and beyond. She has served as lead counsel in numerous high-profile litigation matters. She has been noted by peers in top publications such as The Best Lawyers in America, Chambers USA and Benchmark Litigation as “one of the best litigators in the city – aggressive, driven and responsive.” She has an “easygoing but powerful presence” and is noted for her “ability to handle things calmly while maintaining an unflinching stance.”

Stephanie is also a member of the firm’s Executive Committee. She previously chaired the firm-wide national Litigation Department, overseeing more than 250 attorneys in 21 offices, a position she held for seven years. In state and federal courts across the United States, she has earned a reputation for sound judgment and innovative problem solving. Corporate executives, Fortune 500 companies and family-owned businesses turn to Stephanie for solutions to their most difficult and sensitive personal and professional issues.

Stephanie has tried and arbitrated complicated and complex business litigation, including injunctions. She handles the following types of litigation:

  • Directors’ and officers’ liability and corporate governance
  • Shareholder and partnership disputes
  • Family business disputes
  • Defense of class actions
  • Books and records demands
  • Shareholder derivative actions
  • Intellectual property disputes
  • Errors and omissions disputes
  • Unfair business practices and competition and misappropriation of trade secrets
  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Federal RICO actions
  • Health care/physician issues
  • Employment litigation, including restrictive covenants
  • Defamation and media issues
  • Ethics and professional liability
  • Insurance and reinsurance issues

In recent years, Stephanie has received a remarkable collection of accolades from the most prestigious ranking organizations in the world.

Stephanie has been named in “The Best Lawyers in America” in Commercial Litigation, and as one of the leading litigation attorneys in Pennsylvania by Chambers USA. Benchmark Litigation lists Stephanie as one of the “Top 250 Female Litigators in America” and as a “Litigation Star” in Pennsylvania. Stephanie was also selected for inclusion in the inaugural edition of the Martindale-Hubbell® Bar Register of AV Preeminent Women Lawyers™, which includes less than five percent of women lawyers, and has been added every year since.

For many years, Stephanie has been named as a “Super Lawyer” and one of the “Top 50 Women Lawyers in Pennsylvania.” She was one of only 10 women included in a list of the “Top 100 Lawyers in Pennsylvania” by Philadelphia Magazine and Law & Politics Magazine, which also recognized her as one of the “Top 100 Lawyers in Philadelphia.”

Stephanie is also a recipient of the coveted Sandra Day O’Connor Award, presented by the Philadelphia Bar Association. Named for the first woman justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, the award has been conferred annually since 1993 on a woman attorney who has achieved the highest degree of professional excellence in her field and has visibly used her position and stature in the community to mentor, promote and advance other women lawyers.

Related Posts

blue corporate culture puzzle being assembled by multiple hands

Managing Organizational Culture as an Enterprise Asset

December 5, 2019
job candidates awaiting inerview

An Unconventional Interview Question: “Do You Have an HR Department?”

December 5, 2019
closeup of magnifying glass on gray background

DiCianni’s Idea: How It All Got Started

December 4, 2019
woman's hand touching beam of light on digital blue screen

The Evolution of Compliance

December 3, 2019
Next Post
illustration of bag of O negative blood on blue background

Innovation: The Organization’s Lifeblood

Free Downloads

OFAC whitepaper cover
Compliance Job Interview Q&A
Reputation Risk Management Research

RSS SEC Litigation News

  • SBB Research Group LLC, et al. December 4, 2019
    SEC Charges Hedge Fund Adviser and Top Executives with Fraud
  • NIT Enterprises, Inc., et al. November 29, 2019
    SEC Halts Penny Stock Scheme Targeting Seniors
  • MiMedx Group, Inc., Parker H. Petit, William C. Taylor, and Michael J. Senken November 26, 2019
    SEC Charges Biotech Company and Executives with Accounting Fraud

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks Big Data blockchain board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management corporate culture corporate governance culture of ethics cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making Dodd-Frank DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit internet of things (IoT) KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • Audit
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • HR Compliance
  • Leadership and Career
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights