Human-Centered Change Drives Real Supply Chain Transformation

When organizations talk about transformation, they often start with technology. Whether it’s a new platform, a digital dashboard or an AI-powered analytics engine, the emphasis tends to be on what the tool can do. However, meaningful transformation doesn’t start with technology. It starts with people.

Any technology investment’s success or failure ultimately hinges on human behavior. Behind every rollout, software upgrade and digitized process is a deeply human journey shaped by mindset, motivation and emotion. If organizations fail to account for the people behind the process, they risk seeing their investment fail.

This human-centered journey is even more critical when it comes to the supply chain, where risk management, compliance and visibility are essential. Companies simply can’t afford failed implementations or delayed adoption in managing today’s complex supply chains. They need transformation that sticks; they need change that’s embraced, not just imposed. That’s why we must shift the conversation away from just features and functionality to include how people experience change.

The human curve: Change isn’t linear

Anyone who has led a digital transformation effort knows the path is rarely a straight line. It’s usually a curve, a highly emotional one. The Kübler-Ross change curve, developed initially to model grief, is increasingly used in organizational settings to anticipate people’s emotional reactions to change. The five stages — denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance — mirror how employees often respond to major disruptions or new technologies.

It’s not that employees are being difficult; change is hard. It challenges their routines, their competence and sometimes their sense of control. A new supply chain compliance platform or risk management tool may make perfect sense from a business standpoint, but the individual expected to use it daily might feel overwhelmed or threatened.

Recognizing that people experience change emotionally, not just rationally, is the first step toward driving meaningful transformation. It helps leaders approach rollouts with empathy, create space for feedback, and build momentum by addressing concerns rather than ignoring them.

Featured

Beyond the Loading Dock: How Tariff Uncertainty Creates Financial Reporting Challenges

by Lara Long

July 23, 2025

Unpredictable global trade policies, led by a scattershot rollout of tariffs levied by the US, is having widespread implications across huge swaths of the world economy and affecting organizations large and small in diverse industries. And while those most obviously affected are often operations and supply chain teams, Riveron’s Lara Long spotlights the tariff-driven financial reporting challenges that can ripple through the entire organization.

Read moreDetails

The ADKAR framework: A practical, people-first roadmap

Emotional insight is powerful, but it needs to be paired with structure. That’s where the ADKAR model comes in. ADKAR is a change management framework focused on five key building blocks:

1. Awareness of the need for change.
2. Desire to participate and support the change.
3. Knowledge of how to change.
4. Ability to implement new skills and behaviors.
5. Reinforcement to sustain the change.

ADKAR is effective because it mirrors how individuals adopt change. It isn’t about a big-bang transformation. It’s about micro-moments of buy-in — one person, one decision, one action at a time.

Let’s break it down in a supply chain context:

• Awareness might come from a new mandate requiring visibility into tier-two suppliers.
• Desire might be cultivated by demonstrating how a digital platform can reduce workload and improve safety.
• Knowledge involves formal and informal training on how to use the platform.
• Ability requires hands-on experience, troubleshooting and support to ensure people can perform the tasks.
• Reinforcement means celebrating wins, tracking usage and continuing to communicate the “why” behind the change.

When leaders approach change with this progression in mind, they move from mandating compliance to nurturing adoption.

Layering the models: Anticipate emotion, enable action

Used together, the Kübler-Ross and ADKAR models form a powerful one-two punch in supply chain risk management transformation. One helps leaders empathize with emotional resistance, the other provides a path forward. For example, if a team is stuck in the denial or frustration phase of the change curve, it signals that they haven’t yet achieved proper awareness or desire. Rather than pushing forward with technical training, the focus should be on communication, storytelling and engagement.

Conversely, if teams seem emotionally ready but are still underperforming, it may be a sign that they lack knowledge or ability. That’s the time for hands-on support and mentoring, not all-staff meetings.

This layered approach gives organizations a diagnostic lens. It helps them understand not just where resistance is showing up but why and what to do about it.

Real-world impact: Change management in high-stakes environments

Supply chain-heavy industries like construction, manufacturing, energy and transportation operate in some of the most risk-sensitive environments. In these sectors, a missed inspection, lapse in safety compliance or lack of supply chain visibility can carry serious consequences. As a result, digital tools are critical but only if they are fully adopted and consistently used.

For instance, consider the hypothetical example of a global logistics company looking to implement a new supplier qualification system across multiple regions that finds adoption lagging despite the technology’s capabilities. Site managers are slow to onboard vendors, teams revert to legacy tools like spreadsheets and compliance delays begin to emerge.

Rather than enforcing stricter mandates, the organization should reassess its change management approach. Applying the ADKAR framework, they could instead focus on reinforcing the purpose behind the change, highlighting tangible benefits, such as improved worker safety and time savings, and empowering local champions to support their peers. Emotional responses to the change could also be mapped using the Kübler-Ross change curve to further enable the organization to anticipate resistance and effectively tailor communications.

Building a culture ready for change

Of course, no single project or framework can drive transformation independently. Organizations need a change-ready culture, one where people expect, embrace and even advocate for continual evolution.

That means investing not just in systems but in leadership and learning. It means elevating change management from a tactical function to a strategic imperative. It means measuring success by go-live dates and human outcomes: satisfaction, engagement and behavior change.

Here are a few ways to get started:

• Start with empathy: Before any rollout, map the emotional journey. What are people likely to feel? What are they afraid of? What do they stand to gain?
• Design interventions that meet people where they are: Different roles, regions and cultures experience change differently. Customize support.
• Celebrate small wins: Every training completed, new feature used and positive comment is a chance to reinforce momentum.
• Train leaders to be change agents: Managers are the frontline of adoption. Equip them to coach, support and model the new behaviors.
• Keep listening: Feedback loops — surveys, interviews, check-ins and the like — are critical. They turn users into co-creators.

As a real-world example, recently, a global supply chain and procurement organization implemented a new supplier relationship system. The project team sought to address lessons learned from previous projects. Chief among those was the need to engage stakeholders in a more meaningful and effective way. In previous projects, stakeholder resistance to change had affected project timelines, budgets and user adoption. Among the root causes identified were a top-down planning approach that left little room for feedback from different geographies and the use of standard communication templates that were too high level and didn’t provide the detail needed.

The first step the new project team took was to conduct an in-depth stakeholder analysis, identifying key leaders and influencers and assessing the impact of the new systems on managers and frontline employees. With this analysis in hand, key stakeholders were brought into the planning process sooner and tailored implementation playbooks were developed.

The overall program plan was maintained while addressing local-level needs, resulting in fewer project issues and timeline delays. These outcomes highlighted the importance of understanding stakeholder needs and collaborating with them on their change journey.

The human side is the hard part, but it’s also the leverage point

Technology will continue to evolve. New platforms will emerge. Supply chain risk and complexity will only grow. But one thing remains constant: People are the engine behind every transformation.

By honoring the human side of change, organizations don’t just smooth the implementation process, they increase ROI, reduce burnout and build lasting capability.

We often say, “Change is hard.” But what we really mean is that change is human. And when we lead with that truth, we unlock the full power of transformation — not just in the supply chain but in our culture, performance and purpose.