Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

The Gig Economy: Risks vs. Rewards

Creating an Organizational Approach to Compliance

by Elliot Dinkin
January 21, 2020
in Compliance, Featured
3D render of smartphone, ride-sharing services in the sharing economy

Legislative initiatives and a generational shift are changing the dynamics of the American workplace. Cowden Associates’ Elliot Dinkin urges employers to be aware of these developments and the inherent risks.

Companies of all types and sizes are using contingent workers at a greater scale than ever before. Beyond the traditional outside contractor, who might perform a discrete set of specific tasks, the contingent workforce, as often as not, now operates within an organization just as if it is part of the employee base. Professional services can be supplied under a statement-of-work agreement; a freelancer with unique skills might be retained through an online labor marketplace, or traditional temporary workers might be hired through a staffing agency.

The gig economy is a task-based approach to work that enables greater flexibility for both the workers and the company engaging them. Economists note the globalization of the contingent workforce and predict rapid growth in this sector.

The gig economy is innovative but has created a hotbed of litigation, particularly over the issue of worker classification – namely whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee for purposes of wage-and-hour protections, protection from workplace discrimination and other federal and state employment benefits.

Even before the rise of the gig economy, worker classification had been complicated by the fact that differing tests apply, depending upon whether classification pertains to income tax withholding and employment tax withholding and reporting under IRS regulations, FLSA coverage or coverage under other employment benefit programs, such as unemployment insurance or workers’ compensation. Therefore, it has always been possible that application of the different tests could yield different results, with resulting uncertainty and exposure to liability for unpaid taxes or unpaid overtime. The classification issues arising in the gig economy have only complicated an already difficult determination.

Risks vs. Rewards

There are significant offerings of technology systems to help companies manage gig workers (Gigs) to ensure compliance with tax, wage and hour and other employment-related rules. This is clearly not enough, as the contingent workers and their tasks create compliance risks.

The challenge is that if Gigs are not managed properly, the costs will far outweigh the benefits. As in every aspect of your operations, balancing the risks and rewards is essential, and having an effective management system in place is critical.

Beyond the noncompliance from misclassifying contingent employees, the full range of risk problems that can occur during operation of the tasks assigned to these employees must be considered:

  • Regulatory Compliance – If the Gigs are engaged in any activities subject to regulatory compliance requirements or company policies or procedures, they need to have communication and training.
  • Operational Risk – If Gigs are engaged in critical tasks that can affect business continuity, quality control and operational schedules, they present operational risk that must be adequately managed.
  • Information Risk – If Gigs handle confidential data, they present an information security risk, so controls must be put in place. There is a huge reputational risk associated with any significant data breaches or instances of regulatory noncompliance. Penalties and costs of remediation may be significant.

It should be obvious that the Gigs must be managed appropriately to ensure they receive communications and training to address company risks and compliance requirements overall. The challenge — considering how difficult it is for regular employees — is extending this requirement to Gigs.

Gigs must be integrated into the company culture and understand the established policies and guidance around risk tolerances and limits. Their roles and tasks must be clearly defined so that they receive the same consideration as employees engaged in such roles and tasks. A clear record indicating ownership of the relationship with each contingent worker, defined roles and tasks, communications, policy distribution, attestations of understanding and risk-based training must be created and maintained.

Approach to Compliance

Once the various issues have been defined, establishing an internal process is essential and should include the following:

  • Understand the makeup of the gig workers population. Follow a path that distinguishes between experienced Gigs (who have a career behind them and seek the autonomy of freelancing) compared with the mobile new Gigs (with limited experience).
  • Evaluate what type of packages would be more suitable for Gigs. Why not consider providing various forms of other benefits and/or simply providing lump-sum payments to reflect the preference of Gigs for cash?
  • Create a single HR focus to deal with Gigs’ specific issues. This should bring a degree of consistency in management of Gigs within the organization.
  • Focus on onboarding and integration. Management and HR need to (1) be involved in the integration of Gigs and (2) where practical, use top Gig talent to perform certain tasks and training for the company as they bring on more Gigs, with the objective to position the company as an employer of choice for Gigs.

Establishing a Method to Manage Future Law Changes

One thing is certain: There will be more litigation and law changes regarding Gigs. For example, in California, Uber and Lyft have announced that if they lose the legal battle and are required to reclassify drivers as employees, they anticipate the need to offset an anticipated increase in costs up to 30 percent by cutting the number of workers and scheduling drivers in advance to avoid overtime, thereby reducing the flexibility that is currently enjoyed by drivers. In the meantime, Uber and Lyft have embarked on a $90 million lobbying effort to support a ballot initiative to exempt them from AB5’s impact as well as to seek agreement with governmental and labor groups to create a new category of short-term or on-demand workers. This compromise is somewhere between contractor and employee, who then would be eligible for only certain state employment protections and benefits.

Previous negotiations included the companies’ willingness to support a system of worker-determined benefits, including PTO and retirement benefits pro-rated on how often drivers work, base rate pay for drivers to increase driver pay overall and the formation of a drivers’ association to enable drivers to connect with peers and to provide an appeal process for driver deactivations. Regardless of how this all is settled, the risks associated with regulatory, operations and information compliance will continue and require a specific management focus centered on risk.

Numerous states have considered or are considering laws related to gig workers. As these laws will most definitely differ from state to state, businesses everywhere will need to monitor the changing laws to apply the right test for the specific compliance issue at hand in the various locations.


Tags: discriminationwage complianceworker misclassification
Previous Post

AI-Based Narrative Generation for Risk & Compliance Reporting

Next Post

6 Elements of a Successful Compliance Resume

Elliot Dinkin

Elliot Dinkin is President and CEO at Cowden Associates, Inc., specializing in helping corporate clients find the best solutions, both for the enterprise and its employees, with regard to compensation, health care benefits, retirement and pension issues, and Taft-Hartley fund consulting. Elliot provides leadership to position the company at the forefront of the industry. He earned his MBA in Finance and Accounting from the University of Pittsburgh and a BA in Economics (Cum Laude) from Dickinson College.

Related Posts

illustration of man on ladder with binoculars, 2021 outlook concept

Financial Services Compliance in 2021

January 25, 2021
illustration of mafia man in silhouette with red tie

The Mafia’s Jackpot: How Criminal Organizations are Profiting from COVID-19

January 22, 2021
illustration of videoconference, screen and speech bubbles

New Risks as COVID-19 Forces Rapid Technology Adoption

January 21, 2021
silhouette of businesspeople in meeting with blue cyber background

Cyber Risk Quantification and Prioritization is the Future of GRC

January 20, 2021
Next Post
illustration of multiple raised hands holding resumes/CVs

6 Elements of a Successful Compliance Resume

Access realtime data
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights