Wednesday, January 20, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Game Theory, Compliance & Corporate Criminality

Predicting, Preventing and Reacting Appropriately to Fraud and Corporate Crime

by Rafael Aguilera Gordillo
September 18, 2019
in Compliance, Featured
red dice rolling over green felt surface

How to avoid fraud and corporate crime (while improving compliance programs) from Rafael Aguilera Gordillo, professor of Corporate Compliance and International Security.

Increasingly complex economic crime is jeopardizing justice in general and criminal law in particular.

On many occasions, there are issues with effectively facing the questions and difficulties posed by corporate criminality and white-collar crime. For this reason, “traditional” criminal law should assume theories and tools from other sciences, such as economics, sociology, political science, etc., which have proved to be useful for analyzing human behavior in organizations and the decision-making process. The application of some concrete research areas coming from these theories, such as “new institutionalism” or “game theory,” can be very effective to predict and prevent possible criminal behavior or corrupt practices in businesses, associations, foundations, political parties and so on.

The “new institutionalism of rational choice” is not limited to introducing the social context in individual decision-making; it also offers a joint analysis about the structure and functioning of the organizations themselves. In addition to this, this theory works without breaking the field of social sciences on its multiple irreconcilable fronts (economic, political, sociological, historical, philosophical). This is possible thanks to OSTROM, who develops a theory that brings together institutional analysis with the rational choice theory.

Succinctly, it can be said that OSTROM[1] highlights the following universal elements, which are present in every institution:

  • Participants (individual or corporate)
  • Participants’ status on the organization chart
  • Potential results that participants can obtain
  • A set of permissible actions, as well as the function that links actions and results
  • Control of actions and results by individuals according to this function
  • Available information on actions and results
  • Cost and benefits of actions and results

However, HODGES rightly points out in his paper, “Ethics in Business Practice and Regulation” the limited success of rational choice and a basic deterrence model[2] in order to analyze wrongdoings or the reasons people commit crimes. Therefore, to overcome this problem, I propose the assumption of the postulates of game theory and use their methodological tools in compliance and corporate criminal law areas.

Game Theory in Compliance

Game theory (frequently used in economics, diplomacy, biology, etc.) is mainly focused on the dynamics of action and strategic interaction among participants who act according to their own interests. This theory explains how individuals, through their rational behavior and based on their interactions with others, provide themselves with regulation. These situations originate coordination norms or conventions that culminate in political, mercantile, civil organizations and, ultimately, in the social pact that can materialize in a constitution.

Moreover, this theory is even appropriate to perform an analysis of the origin of rule of law, the law enforcement, the power as coercive power reserved to the state and how other entities and institutions arise; it may also help to clarify how the state has grown in structure and developed standards in democratic regimes.

An article that dealt with game theory in law can be quoted,[3], [4] but it was ELSTER[5] who stood out in his study of how spontaneous order arises, in what he called “Hayek’s program.” In purity, it is a very important reflection for the world of law. This author defends and argues that the sources of law do not arise by the legislator, but actually come from a more remote phenomenon (but also less arbitrary): Game theory helps to clarify how institutions arise and work to respond to the paradoxes of relations between interacting subjects.

This theory is accompanied by a valuable methodological development that deals with the analysis of the decision-making processes, taking into consideration such important matters as the informational asymmetries themselves or the compliance or strategic breach – an example of this is the famous Prisoner’s Dilemma.

These are fully assumable theories to reconfigure modern concepts of compliance and corporate criminal law. They explain human behavior, taking into account transcendental aspects such as correlations and tactical elements with respect to other individuals or groups of individuals, as well as the influence of organizations or businesses.

The theories mentioned above are based on methodologies of pragmatic analysis of proven validity in other fields of extensive scientific tradition. Therefore, the application of these can be very useful tools for the prediction and prevention of possible criminal behavior in the process of developing corporate compliance programs or crime prevention programs, through the modelling of possible behaviors, strategies and criminally relevant risks. The resulting corporate crime prevention programs will be much better adapted to the organizational reality of the business, since it truly considers their particularities and differentiating elements (information flows, status of the members in the organization chart, set of possible decisions, etc.).

A Link Between Compliance and Big Data or AI

Additionally, it is increasingly common to use software suits to analyze risks, costs and benefits in business decision-making processes. These tools use advanced analytic techniques (e.g. very large, diverse data sets that include structured, semi-structured and unstructured data, aka big data). Moreover, AI is allowing machines and their powerful processors to use huge amounts of data and information to make decisions, solve problems and even learn through the so-called “master algorithms.” The combination of big data and AI is increasingly facilitating decision-making processes in businesses and helping them to avoid fraud and predict risks, breaches and legal noncompliance. Nevertheless, big data and AI raise doubts and serious dilemmas when they are analyzed from an ethical or legal perspective.

Essentially, many of these software solutions are based on algorithms and models of applied mathematics that come from the theories mentioned above. In short, it can be said that computer science it is also assuming the validity and big utility of these theories and mathematical modeling.

Therefore, a determined integration of game theory and new institutionalism in the field of corporate compliance and criminal law would also allow the establishment of a clear link between new technologies and corporate crime or fraud and would help overcome the problems and dilemmas associated with the use of AI and big data in businesses.


[1] OSTROM, E.; Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, 2005.

[2] BROOKS,T.; Deterrence, 2014.

[3] ULLMANN-MARGALIT, E.; The Emergence of Norms, 1977.

[4] AXELROD, R.; The Evolution of Cooperation, 1984.

[5] Elster, J.; The cement of society: a study of social order, 1989.


Tags: Artificial Intelligence/A.I.Big Datadecision-making
Previous Post

Financial Reporting Control Considerations

Next Post

encompass corporation Analyzes AML Penalties

Rafael Aguilera Gordillo

Rafael Aguilera Gordillo is professor of Corporate Compliance and International Security at University Loyola Andalusia. He is an academic visitor at Centre for Socio-Legal Studies of University of Oxford and academic member of the Anti-Corruption Academic Initiative of United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Rafael is a certified compliance officer (IFCA and Cescom) and expert lawyer in corporate crime and compliance, with extensive professional experience in legal advice to and defense of businesses and public entities. He was one of the first doctors in Spain to carry out doctoral research on the analytical foundation of compliance and the criminal liability regime of legal persons. Currently, he focuses his research on the use of game theory and modeling in the field of corporate compliance and fraud prevention. Rafael holds a master’s degree in Criminal Law from the University of Seville and a master’s degree in Public Law from the University of Córdoba. He is author of the monograph Corporate Compliance in Spain (Thomson Reuters, 2018), which is designated as complementary material of the IV International Compliance Congress, co-author of Compliances and Corporate Criminal Liability (Thomson Reuters, 2017); and author of many articles, including “Standardization in the context of Corporate Compliance.” Rafael can be reached on LinkedIn.

Related Posts

man working on smartphone and laptop

Adverse Media Screening: Relying on Google Alone Can Expose Organizations to Risk

January 19, 2021
hand showing three fingers on gray background

A Culture of Compliance: The 3 R’s

January 19, 2021
2021 with light bulb in place of zero on orange background

Why 2021 is a Fresh Start for Compliance Training

January 18, 2021
challenge and solution concept with person standing at large gap

General Counsel Post-Pandemic: A Catalyst for Risk Fragmentation

January 18, 2021
Next Post
burlap bag of money on scale with judge's gavel

encompass corporation Analyzes AML Penalties

Access realtime data

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management culture of ethics cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights