No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights

DOJ’s Pilot Program: Carrot and Stick or Bluff and Bluster?

by Benjamin Britz
May 12, 2016
in Uncategorized
FCPA violations remain serious despite DOJ incentives

with co-author Michael A. DeBernardis

On April 5, 2016, in a memorandum entitled Fraud Section’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement Plan and Guidance (“Guidance”), the DOJ’s Fraud Section unveiled an initiative to encourage voluntary self-reporting in FCPA cases.

The purported “carrot” is the one-year pilot program laid out by the Guidance, under which the DOJ will allow a reduction of up to 50 percent off the low-end of the applicable U.S. Sentencing Guidelines penalty range for companies that self-report violations, cooperate fully with the DOJ’s subsequent investigation and take steps to remediate the misconduct. In addition, under the pilot program, companies that have implemented an effective compliance program may not be required to retain a corporate compliance monitor. The “stick” is the threat that “FCPA violations that might have gone uncovered in the past are now more likely to come to light.” In particular, the Fraud Section points to: (1) its increase in FCPA investigative and prosecutorial resources through the addition of 10 new prosecutors and three new FBI squads — all dedicated to corruption and (2) the increased collaboration between the DOJ and international law enforcement bodies to combat bribery.

Pilot Program

According to the Guidance, in order to qualify for full credit under the pilot program (50 percent reduction from the otherwise applicable U.S. Sentencing Guidelines penalty range, no compliance monitor and consideration of declination of prosecution), companies must meet certain requirements.

  • First, a company must voluntarily disclose the FCPA violation. In order for a disclosure to be considered voluntary, it must occur prior to an “imminent threat” of disclosure by an employee or third party or the initiation of a government investigation, be made within a reasonable time of the company becoming aware of the violation and include all relevant facts (including information regarding the individuals involved). Moreover, a disclosure will not be considered voluntary if the company is required to make it by law, agreement or contract. The Guidance is clear that even with full cooperation and appropriate remediation, absent voluntary disclosure, the Fraud Section’s FCPA Unit will grant a maximum reduction of only 25 percent off the bottom of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines penalty range.
  • Second, a company must provide full cooperation to the Fraud Section’s FCPA Unit. Doubling-down on the so-called Yates Memo issued last year, in order to receive full cooperation credit, a company must be prepared to disclose all facts relevant to the investigation, including the involvement of the company’s officers, employees or agents.
  • Third, a company must take appropriate and timely steps to remediate the misconduct, including implementing an effective ethics and compliance program, appropriate discipline of employees and any other steps to reduce the risk of misconduct recurring.
  • Finally, to be eligible for the credit, even a company that voluntarily self-discloses, fully cooperates and remediates will be required to disgorge all profits resulting from the FCPA violation.

 

Potential Impact on the Decision Whether to Voluntarily Disclose an FCPA Violation   

Will this program change the equation for a company with knowledge of an FCPA violation? The potential reductions from the otherwise applicable Sentencing Guidelines penalty range under the pilot program are significant, as is the opportunity to avoid the imposition of the compliance monitor or avoid prosecution altogether.

Moreover, the chances of an FCPA violation forever staying “internal” are growing smaller and smaller by the day. The Guidance’s reference to increased cooperation among international enforcement bodies is not just bluster. In the last 18 months, we have seen DOJ settlements arising out of cooperation with the national authorities in the U.K., Indonesia, Switzerland, Germany, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Cyprus and Taiwan, as well as other international organizations such as the African Development Bank. In addition, employees have more incentive than ever to report violations directly to U.S. authorities and collect potentially millions of dollars in whistleblower awards. Finally, as recent headlines such as those covering the Panama Papers demonstrate, the potential for a data breach (either internal or through the work of hackers) that reveals wrongdoing is perhaps at its greatest discovery risk point in history. This would suggest that in some situations a company would be wise to self-disclose misconduct and take the accompanying remediation credit rather than waiting for the DOJ to come knocking on the door.

However, even under the pilot program, there are no guarantees for companies willing to approach the DOJ hat-in-hand. In allowing up to a 50 percent reduction, the Guidance still provides significant discretion to the FCPA Unit under the pilot program in determining how much credit will be given to companies who choose to participate, without any guidance as to how the determination will ultimately be made. The requirement of full disgorgement of profits also allows for a great deal of discretion, as the amount of profit resulting from improper conduct is often difficult to calculate and can be a point of negotiation itself. Given that FCPA settlements can now reach into the billions of dollars, how much comfort will companies take from such a heavily couched offer?

Moreover, it is not clear that the pilot program will actually change the way the FCPA Unit approaches settlements. The DOJ has historically afforded substantial credit to companies that voluntarily disclose FCPA violations, cooperate with an investigation and remediate misconduct–a fact acknowledged in the Guidance. A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, issued by the DOJ and SEC in 2012, provides several examples of companies that were able to avoid prosecution because the companies voluntarily disclosed the violation, cooperated fully and took appropriate remedial action. It is not clear that the reduction offered under the pilot program is significantly, if at all, greater for those companies willing to voluntarily disclose than it was before.

Ultimately, even if the pilot program does not have the impact that was intended, it remains essential that corporations consider the range of potential consequences and benefits of voluntary self-disclosure, particularly in light of the increasing likelihood that any significant FCPA violation will eventually become public. To make an informed analysis and best protect its interests, it remains as important as ever that a company fully investigate potential wrongdoing in an organized, transparent and defensible manner. It is only after such an investigation that a company can make the difficult decision regarding voluntary disclosure and take the appropriate remedial measures that are essential to prevent similar misconduct in the future.


Tags: Tone at the Top
Previous Post

OutsideIQ Launches Real-Time Risk Monitoring Tool

Next Post

PwC: Board Composition – Key Trends and Developments

Benjamin Britz

Benjamin Britz

May 12 - Benjamin BritzBenjamin S. Britz is of counsel at Hughes & Hubbard’s Washington, D.C. office.  Mr. Britz advises clients on all aspects of corporate governance, including internal investigations, SEC enforcement, anti-corruption compliance, fraud and money laundering matters, shareholder class action and derivative litigation and corporate compliance monitorships. Mr. Britz has represented clients before all manner of domestic and international enforcement agencies, including the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, U.K. Serious Fraud Office and the enforcement offices of the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and African Development Bank, among others.  His practice particularly focuses on anti-corruption compliance, securities enforcement and accounting and procurement fraud matters. He has performed internal investigations and due diligence exercises around the globe and across an array of different industries. Mr. Britz has particular experience in conducting corporate compliance monitorships and compliance program evaluations, and he has assisted American, European, African and Asian clients in designing, administering and maintaining anti-corruption, integrity compliance, anti-money laundering and corporate governance programs. Mr. Britz has also successfully defended numerous clients in multilateral development bank (MDB) sanctions proceedings such as where corruption, fraud or other misconduct in MDB-financed projects is suspected. He also regularly represents companies and individuals in shareholder class action and derivative litigations. Prior to joining Hughes Hubbard, Mr. Britz clerked on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for Chief Judge James G. Carr.

Related Posts

personnel management

Preparing for Budget Cuts in 2023? Be Sure Personnel Management Isn’t on the Chopping Block

by Vera Cherepanova
March 1, 2023

For compliance departments that need to do more with less, it’s tempting to lean into automated systems. Compliance and ethics...

boris johnson resigns as UK prime minister

Them’s the Breaks: What Companies Can Learn From Boris Johnson’s Downfall

by Miller & Chevalier
July 27, 2022

Embattled Prime Minister Boris Johnson resigned after a revolt in his own party. While the political repercussions of Johnson’s tenure,...

Corporate Liability Reform in the UK is Accelerating: Your GRC Teams Need to Future-Proof Compliance  

Corporate Liability Reform in the UK is Accelerating: Your GRC Teams Need to Future-Proof Compliance  

by Fabio Feretti and Sarah Wrigley
March 30, 2022

The UK’s just-enacted corporate crime legislation is a step in the right direction but failed to address a wide range...

Making Money Is Not a Mission: 10 Essays on the Compliance Culture Revolution From Michael Volkov

Making Money Is Not a Mission: 10 Essays on the Compliance Culture Revolution From Michael Volkov

by Corporate Compliance Insights
February 11, 2022

As broad terms like "culture" continue to gain devotees, it may seem natural to conclude that more businesses and organizations...

Next Post
Board Composition - key trends and developments

PwC: Board Composition - Key Trends and Developments

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT