No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe
Jump to a Section
  • At the Office
    • Ethics
    • HR Compliance
    • Leadership & Career
    • Well-Being at Work
  • Compliance & Risk
    • Compliance
    • FCPA
    • Fraud
    • Risk
  • Finserv & Audit
    • Financial Services
    • Internal Audit
  • Governance
    • ESG
    • Getting Governance Right
  • Infosec
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
  • Opinion
    • Adam Balfour
    • Jim DeLoach
    • Mary Shirley
    • Yan Tougas
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Governance

CII Urges IPOs to Adopt Equitable Equity Structures

by Ken Bertsch
May 5, 2016
in Governance
Governance provisions and one share, one vote structure critical to protecting IPO shareholders

When is a private company ready to go public? Most would agree IPO readiness requires a plan and a strategic niche; a competent team of managers and employees; a meaningful, growing revenue stream; and profitability or a path to profitability. Large institutional investors holding more than $3 trillion in combined assets that are members of the Council of Institutional Investors (CII) recently added another critical hurdle: a fair shake for the company’s public, non-affiliated shareholders (link: http://www.cii.org/ipo_policy).

At the heart of this fair shake is an equity structure that fairly aligns and investors’ voting power to an investor’s capital at risk.  Some companies have multiple classes of shares with differential voting rights, usually to enable insiders or founders to control the board of directors despite owning a minority of equity.

With a “one share, one vote” structure, in contrast, incumbent corporate directors—and the chief executive who reports to them—have two paths to retain control of the company in its public form: holding a majority of outstanding shares or securing the confidence of the company’s broad ownership base.

The vast majority of recent IPO companies embrace “one share, one vote,” like most publicly held U.S. companies.  However, about 7 percent opt for multiple classes of stock with unequal voting rights, including some significant players. In 2015, more than twice as much capital was raised in IPOs launched with these multiple-class structures than in 2014.  These differential voting rights serve to protect control of the company by management or a controlling holder and can leave little recourse for outside investors if issues arise.

For many years, multiple-class structures have been particularly popular among media companies, with Viacom a prominent example.  Some of the pitfalls of multiple-class structures are suggested by the challenges Viacom faces in generational transition, with lack of accountability to shareholders generally even as there are fights over the controlling shareholder’s role.

More recently, these structures have been in fashion among certain high-profile technology companies.  Google (now, Alphabet) went public with a dual class structure in 2004, and subsequently added an additional non-voting class. Alibaba, First Data, Groupon, LinkedIn, Square and Zynga are among companies with differential voting rights.  Some of these companies are highly successful, but others have suffered significant setbacks.  This mixed record is not unlike other tech companies, but without the same responsiveness to markets to correct poor strategy or management.

CEOs of multiple-class structures often justify them as necessary to preserve the ability of management to pursue long-term strategy in the face of short-term market pressures. But the misalignment of voting rights and economic interest tends to have certain negative effects in the longer term.

A 2016 study commissioned by the IRRC Institute (link: http://irrcinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Controlled-Companies-IRRCI-2015-FINAL-3-16-16.pdf) found that controlled multi-class companies overall underperformed non-controlled companies in delivering total return to shareholders (TSR) over all periods reviewed (one-, three-, five- and 10-year periods).  Over 10 years, the average total TSR was 7.4 percent at controlled companies with multi-class structures, compared with 8.5 percent for non-controlled companies, a substantial difference in outcomes for shareholders.

Despite this underperformance, there was less change in board composition at controlled multi-class companies. The IRRCi study found that more than 23 percent of such companies had average board tenure in excess of 15 years, compared with just 7 percent at non-controlled companies.  The study also found that at multi-class controlled companies, the proportion of directors designated as financial experts was lower, board diversity was lower (which may relate to long board tenure) and CEO pay was higher.

CII’s institutional investor members argue that when a company goes to the capital markets to raise money from the public, investors should have certain protections and basic rights, including a vote that is proportional to the size of their investment. Companies that have differential voting rights at IPO should “sunset” those provisions over a reasonable period of time.  Such a structure is likely to be an impediment to needed change at some point in the company’s future, even if company insiders believe it is justified initially.

It is no surprise that private company insiders, anticipating the scrutiny of public investors after the IPO, find these multi-class structures that are personal entrenchment to be a comfortable option.  That is why it is critically important for market participants involved in the IPO process, including IPO investors themselves, to advocate their concerns about the long-term risks when equity is structured to preserve control in favor of company insiders regardless of economic interest of investors.


Previous Post

Flexera: What Does it Take to Achieve Software License Optimization?

Next Post

Compliance Roundup for April

Ken Bertsch

Ken Bertsch

Ken BertschKen Bertsch is Executive Director of the Council of Institutional Investors.  He has more than two decades of experience in financial and corporate governance matters in leadership roles at CamberView Partners, the Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Moody's Investors Service, TIAA-CREF and the Investor Responsibility Research Center. He holds a JD from Fordham University School and an undergraduate degree from Williams College. He is also a board member of the IRRC Institute.

Related Posts

no right answer

That ‘Do the Right Thing’ Mug? It’s Missing Some Fine Print.

by Vera Cherepanova
May 20, 2025

Ethics isn’t a slogan; it’s a practice

doj sign front

Assessing the Business Risks of the Trump Administration’s ‘Total Elimination’ Strategy

by José Cortina and Jennifer Christian
May 20, 2025

As cartels increasingly participate in mainstream economic activities, traditional due diligence practices become inadequate to address new material support risks

drug cartel soldier camo

Leveraging Human Rights Frameworks to Combat Emerging Cartel Risks

by Nate Lankford, Matteson Ellis and Nisha Sawhney-Murkett
May 19, 2025

As enforcement priorities shift to cartels and foreign terrorist organizations, established human rights processes can identify and mitigate emerging legal...

You are now registered!

Webinar: What Employee Experience Reveals About Your E&C Program

by Corporate Compliance Insights
May 16, 2025

11 a.m. - 12 p.m. ET Tuesday, June 3 Are your ethics and compliance metrics capturing what really matters? Programs...

Next Post
compliance news

Compliance Roundup for April

No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy | AI Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights