No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home FCPA

Barclays Agrees to Pay $6.3M FCPA Settlement

Penalties Levied for Hiring Relatives of Foreign Officials in Asia

by Michael Volkov
October 8, 2019
in FCPA, Featured
barclays sign on stone building

Michael Volkov details the recent FCPA settlement against Barclays for improper hiring practices stretching back several years. One key factor that allowed the issue to continue for so long: a seeming lack of awareness of applicable anti-corruption laws.

Barclays joined the club of global financial institutions settling FCPA violations for hiring of relatives of foreign officials in Asia. Barclays agreed to disgorge $3.8 million and paid prejudgment interest of nearly $1 million and a $1.5 million civil penalty.

As outlined in the SEC settlement order, Barclays Asia-Pacific Region hired 117 job candidates referred by or connected to foreign government officials or non-government clients. Some of the individuals hired individuals who were relatives and friends of government officials and executives of Barclays’ non-government clients with the expectation that the bank would gain investment banking business.

Barclays APAC employees also created false records to conceal the true identity of the person or the entity requesting that a candidate be hired and the reasons for the hire. In April 2009, a senior APAC executive approved an “unofficial intern” program for Barclays in South Korea that was operated separately from Barclays’ formal internship program. Approximately half of the candidates in the unofficial program for Barclays South Korea were connected to Barclays’ clients.

According to a senior banker responsible for the program, “the key factor behind relationship hiring decisions was what business the client could deliver to the bank.” The senior banker explained that the relationship hiring decisions were made based on whether the client was important, whether the hiring would enhance the business relationship and whether hiring the candidate would result in new business. The improper hiring practices began in South Korea and then expanded to other Asian countries.

Surprisingly, Barclays compliance officers were aware of the hiring practices by June 2009, but claimed that they were not aware that its anti-corruption policy prohibited such hiring program. Indeed, in an astounding claim, a senior APAC compliance executive claimed that he had never read Barclays 2009 anti-bribery and corruption policy and that he himself did not understand that compliance was required to review and approve internships or other hiring decisions involving relatives of foreign officials.

A Barclays senior executive claimed that he never knew that offers of employment were items of value under anti-corruption laws. This same lack of knowledge was echoed by several other Barclays bankers.

In September 2010, APAC bankers requested approval to hire the daughter of a foreign official who was the senior executive of a Chinese state-owned enterprise. The daughter performed poorly during the interview process and received a “do not hire” recommendation. Nonetheless, the relationship banker pushed to hire her anyway. When a senior compliance officer was asked to review the hiring, he candidly stated that such a questionable hiring would not be the first time of such an improper hiring. He eventually approved the hiring conditioned on assurances that she had the qualifications to be hired. No assurance was ever provided.

Barclays conducted compliance reviews in APAC during 2011 and 2012 but continued to hire candidates connected to officials at state-owned entities or executives of private clients with whom business was either ongoing or being sought. A Barclays banker who worked in both South Korea and Hong Kong from June 2005 to March 2017 admitted that he was not aware of the FCPA until 2013.

Between 2011 and 2013, Barclays APAC continued to hire based on relationships with foreign officials and non-government clients.

In May 2011, APAC adopted the work experience program, which set forth procedures governing relationship hires and adopted specific controls to identify candidates that were referred for hiring by a client and to explain the rationale for hiring the candidate. Unfortunately, the program requirements were circumvented or ignored in a number of candidate hires. In one instance, a senior banker in Korea falsified a candidate’s connection to a senior executive from a client and a specific contract for issuance of private bonds for a private Korean bank.

In March 2012, Barclays revised its internal policies regarding referral hires to require an attestation that the hire was not being made for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The new requirement had little to no impact on the approval of relationship hires in APAC. Bankers sometimes provided inaccurate attestations and even when the disclosure was accurate, compliance approved the hires despite pending or potential business.

In June 2012, a business presentation identified “strategic hiring” as one component of an action plan to satisfy clients. Even though the presentation was distributed among high-level executives, no one objected to the presentation.

Even with a compliance approval requirement, Barclays bankers in APAC continued to make hires with an intent to advance specific business relationships.

In January 2013, Barclays’ global compliance increased its scrutiny of relationship hiring. Compliance issued a global alert reminding all employees of the prohibitions and review requirements for employee referral hiring. Consistent with the existing policy, the guidance reaffirmed that employees were prohibited from hiring client relationship candidates in connection with obtaining or retaining business from anyone, whether the client was a private client or government entity. The policy also emphasized that all candidates must follow the “standard and independent merit-based recruitment process.”

In February 2013, APAC bankers sought to hire the nephew of the CEO of a key private client. An APAC compliance officer consulted with Barclays’ global compliance about the request from the key private client, which led to a review of the work experience program. Barclays’ global compliance agreed that the hiring recommendation had been preordained: “[I]t appears the business contacts made a ‘hiring’ determination and then sent the candidate to HR for processing.” Despite this, the candidate, who had previously been rejected in late 2012 during the merit-based competition for the formal summer intern program, was nevertheless offered a position in March 2013 as part of the formal summer intern program in APAC. Barclays records related to the hire contain no indication that the compliance department was consulted or even made aware of the March 2013 offer, despite the explicit requirement in the January 2013 guidance. In May 2013, Barclays earned over $2.6 million in revenue from the CEO’s business.

On September 30, 2013, in response to news reports of investigations into relationship hiring practices at other financial institutions in APAC, Barclays further tightened its hiring policy and implemented enhanced controls aimed toward ensuring future hires would be made in compliance with its anti-bribery and corruption policies and applicable law.

The SEC cited the fact that Barclays voluntarily disclosed the conduct, undertook remedial measures by terminating senior executives and other employees involved in the misconduct, revised its hiring policies and procedures and enhanced its compliance programs.

Barclays’ cooperation included providing facts developed during the course of its own internal investigation, providing focused presentations regarding its hiring practices and voluntarily producing voluminous records including detailed spreadsheets related to specific hires and key document binders. Barclays also made its employees available for interviews upon request and facilitated the interviews of former employees by the SEC’s staff, including interviews of certain witnesses who traveled internationally.


Tags: Anti-CorruptionFCPA Enforcement ActionsSEC
Previous Post

It’s Not Personal: 5 Ways Employers Can Avoid Claims of Workplace Retaliation

Next Post

Preparing for Enhanced Regulatory Supervision of Operational Resilience

Michael Volkov

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlaw.com. Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

call of duty activision

Activision Settlement Highlights Where Companies Often Go Wrong With Whistleblowers

by Katherine Krems
March 8, 2023

The SEC has long relied on whistleblowers to enforce securities law, often making it worth their while to the tune...

abac

1-2-3s of ABAC Compliance Programs

by Jag Lamba
March 1, 2023

Despite the proliferation of laws aimed at fighting bribery and corruption, a recent international report found that most countries are...

Hogan Lovells Global Corruption Outlook 2023_f

Global Bribery and Corruption Outlook 2023

by Corporate Compliance Insights
February 16, 2023

What's to come this year? Demands for heightened oversight of employees, subsidiaries and third parties 2023 Update Global Bribery and...

esg sec clawback confusion

Unpacking the SEC’s Executive Compensation Clawback Rule

by John Peiserich
January 4, 2023

The SEC has finalized its long-awaited clawback policy mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, issuing final rules that are scheduled to...

Next Post
illustration of businessman on mountain peak with sword and shield

Preparing for Enhanced Regulatory Supervision of Operational Resilience

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT