Thursday, March 4, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Asia-Pacific Anti-Corruption Rankings for 2015

by Wendy Wysong
February 12, 2016
in Compliance
Asia-Pacific Anti-Corruption Rankings for 2015

with contributing authors Nicola Dresch and Montse Ferrer

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) for 2015, published by Transparency International (TI) on January 27, 2016, shows that globally the scores for more countries improved rather than declined, but the scores for Asia-Pacific remained largely static.

Of the 27 Asia-Pacific countries featured in the CPI 2015, only nine achieved a “passing score” of 50, with the other 18 again scoring below 40. This statistic remains the same as in 2014, indicative of a lack of progress in the region.

The CPI is compiled from expert opinions of public sector corruption, based on reviews of 12 different data sources. The CPI scores countries from 0 to 100, where 0 is perceived to be most corrupt, and 100 is perceived to be least corrupt. Using the scores, TI also ranks the countries from those perceived to be the cleanest (Denmark) to those perceived to be the most corrupt (a tie between North Korea and Somalia).

The CPI for 2015 examines the perception of public sector corruption in 168 countries (compared with 175 in 2014). The lower number of countries included in the 2015 CPI makes trend analysis more complicated. Accordingly, companies operating in the region may find that a country’s score is a more accurate indicator of perceived levels of corruption than its relative rankings.

Major climbers

The major Asia-Pacific climbers in the 2015 CPI ranking include Mongolia (up eight places); India, Myanmar and Thailand (all up nine places); Timor-Leste (up 10 places); China (up 17 places); and Indonesia (up 19 places).

  • Indonesia’s remarkable rise (from 107th to 88th place) belies the fact that its score actually only improved by two points (from 34 to 36 points). However, the improvement may be testament to the growing prominence of Indonesia’s independent anti-corruption commission, the KPK, and its forging of links with other international anti-corruption agencies through the Jakarta Statement on Principles for Anti-Corruption Agencies (Jakarta Principles).
  • Similarly, China’s ranking rose an equally impressive 17 places (from 100th to 83rd place), although its score improved by only one point (from 36 to 37 points). This rise is nonetheless noteworthy when considered against China’s dramatic fall 20 places in 2014. While the 2014 plunge may have been attributable to increased enforcement activities that revealed the full extent of public sector corruption, the 2015 resurgence indicates that China’s well-publicized anti-corruption campaign is having a positive impact on regional and global perception.
  • South Korea’s six-place rise (from 43rd to 37th place) similarly reflects the central government’s efforts to tackle the country’s disparate anti-corruption laws and regulations with the passing of the comprehensive Anti-Corruption and Conflicts of Interest Act, effective in September 2016.
  • The unreliable effect of comparing this year’s rankings with 2014 is best illustrated by the apparent fortunes of the countries at the bottom end of the table. For instance, Afghanistan’s score worsened by one point, but it nonetheless rose six places in the ranking (from 172nd to 166th place).

Notable falls

Notable falls this year include the Philippines (down 10 places) and Nepal and Malaysia (each down four places).

  • The Philippines’ decline (from 85th to 95th place) may well reflect its disjointed anti-corruption legislative framework, which does not prohibit small-value gifts or facilitation payments and is inconsistently enforced.
  • Malaysia’s fall (from 50th place to 54th place) may reflect the impact of the headline-grabbing “1MDB” scandal, in which the Prime Minister Najib Razak has been accused of siphoning money from a state development fund. The Prime Minister’s inability to answer questions about the case, coupled with his lavish lifestyle, has undermined confidence in the leadership’s commitment to anti-corruption, reversing the country’s recent progress up the ranks.
  • At the top end of the spectrum, New Zealand and Australia, consistently recognized as two of the least corrupt countries in the world, fell two places (from 2nd to 4th place, and from 11th to 13th place, respectively). Japan suffered an equivalent decline, dropping three places (from 15th to 18th place), tied with Hong Kong (down one place from 2014).

No change

A large number of countries experienced zero change in their scores since 2014. These included Bhutan, Mongolia, India, Thailand, Vietnam, Timor-Leste, Bangladesh, Papua New Guinea, Laos, Cambodia and North Korea, which remained at the foot of the table.

The relatively static performance of some countries this year, such as India and Sri Lanka, may belie the fact that recent governments came to power with very clear anti-corruption agendas and widespread public support for ending corruption.  If government commitment to those agendas is genuine and tangible changes are implemented from the top down, their scores should improve in the not-too-distant future.

Conclusion

With the fight against corruption dominating the region’s social, political and economic agendas in recent years, the importance of ensuring that anti-corruption policies, procedures and controls are genuine, effective and properly implemented cannot be overstated. This year’s CPI demonstrates it is not enough to “talk the anti-corruption talk” in the region; all stakeholders need to “walk the anti-corruption walk,” as well.

Full Asia-Pacific Rankings

wysong graphic


Tags: GRC
Previous Post

Risk Appetite Depends on Your Hunger and What’s on the Menu

Next Post

Misconduct in the C-Suite: SEC Settles FCPA Case with CEO

Wendy Wysong

Wendy L. Wysong is a partner at Steptoe & Johnson. She served previously as a litigation partner with Clifford Chance, offering clients advice and representation on compliance and enforcement under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Arms Export Control Act, International Traffic in Arms Regulations, Export Administration Regulations, and OFAC Economic Sanctions. She was appointed by the State Department as the ITAR Special Compliance Official for Xe Services (formerly Blackwater) in 2010. Wendy combines her experience as a former federal prosecutor with the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia for 16 years with her regulatory background as the former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement at the Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce. She managed its enforcement program and was involved in the development and implementation of foreign policy through export controls across the administration, including the Departments of Justice, State, Treasury and Homeland Security, as well as the intelligence community. Wendy received her law degree in 1984 from the University of Virginia School of Law, where she was a member of the University of Virginia Law Review.

Related Posts

Thinking Outside the Tick Box

Thinking Outside the Tick Box: Compliance Training as a Competitive Advantage

March 3, 2021
The facade of the SEC in Washington, D.C.

Prepare Now to Comply with SEC’s Updated MD&A and Related Financial Disclosure Requirements

March 3, 2021
illustration of hand holding flashlight illuminating hidden stairs

The Corporate Transparency Act: Pulling Back the Veil

February 23, 2021
King & Spalding: GC Decision Tree for Internal Investigations

King & Spalding: GC Decision Tree for Internal Investigations

February 19, 2021
Next Post
Misconduct in the C-Suite: SEC Settles FCPA Case with CEO

Misconduct in the C-Suite: SEC Settles FCPA Case with CEO

OneTrust offers download to demonstrate privacy management leadership
Access realtime data
Addressing systemic racism in the workplace SAI Global
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence ESG fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights