Thursday, February 25, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Are Certification Standards for Anti-Corruption Compliance Programs Universal?

by Alexandra Almy
February 4, 2016
in Compliance
anti-corruption compliance programs

Can the same standard really apply to all companies? Yes — but it depends on how the standard is applied and how compliance programs are evaluated.

Faced with a large number of anti-corruption compliance guidance on the one hand and with a pressing need to strengthen their reputation and public trust on the other, companies are increasingly considering third-party certification of their anti-corruption compliance programs. As a result, several organizations have developed standards and evaluation methodologies to address this need. The latest has taken the form of an overall compliance management system set of guidelines issued by the ISO (ISO 19600:2014) and a certifiable ISO standard specific to anti-corruption compliance (ISO 37001), which will most likely be published at the end of this year.

Certification standards can be limited, depending on the certification type and methodology

The quality of the certificate, the approach to certification and the expertise of the certifying body make a difference in this area. The main concern involving certification standards and anti-corruption compliance systems is that, as we repeatedly hear at compliance events, “one size does not fit all.” How can one standard take into account all possible aspects of a compliance program across industry sectors, business models, countries of operation and other such company-specific factors while staying practical and relevant to each company?

Useful certification attests to the effectiveness and end purpose of a compliance program

It is now generally accepted among the compliance community that how a program is implemented is as important as how it is designed on paper, and how it is designed must take into account company specifics. Boards and investors are reassured by knowing that their compliance programs are designed to address their companies’ specific corruption risks and are effectively understood and implemented throughout the company. Why a company implements a compliance program is another question authorities try to answer. Does the company have a program simply to satisfy requirements and avoid prosecution? Or does it have a program to effectively eliminate the incidence of corruption?

Fixed, “yes/no, check-the-box” certification standards, while useful in attesting to the existence of a compliance program, do not attest to program effectiveness, nor to an end purpose. This is where the traditional approach to certification reaches its limits; understandably, certifying anti-corruption compliance management systems requires a much more involved level of evaluation than, for example, certifying electrical installations or medical equipment.

Anti-corruption compliance programs: a mirror image of company-specific corruption risk

Given that an anti-corruption compliance program can be just as effective as it is ineffective depending on the company, the most valuable approach to anti-corruption compliance certification involves not just evaluating the program against a detailed, set standard (supposedly, though impossibly, applicable to all companies), but rather evaluating the program both against the company’s specific corruption risks and the body of guidance, recommendations and best practices available to date.

What to look for when shopping for certification

Good quality certification includes corruption risk assessments against which compliance programs are evaluated. It involves regularly-planned, on-site, independent external reviews and recommendations for improvement from trained and experienced professionals. Its certifying body has ensured independence and the absence of conflict of interests, as well as a transparency of certification standards and the scope of reviews.

With good-quality certification, companies can do more than just communicate on a label. They can use the certification process as a management tool to push through their programs and ensure that they are up to evolving, international best practices standards, year after year.

 


Previous Post

The Ultimate Guide to IT Audit Readiness

Next Post

Directors and IT: a User Friendly Guide for Boards

Alexandra Almy

Alexandra Almy has over seven years of professional experience in corporate anti-bribery compliance programs as consultant, communications manager and certification manager at ETHIC Intelligence, a leading certification agency specialized in anti-bribery compliance programs. In addition to managing the certification activity, Alexandra is responsible for creating corporate communications material and website content.  She also drafts responses to consultations (OECD, UK Ministry of Justice, World Bank) on behalf of ETHIC Intelligence and regularly contributes articles on anti-bribery compliance in specialized journals. Prior to joining ETHIC Intelligence, Alexandra studied the political economy of industrialized societies at the University of California, Berkeley and international security at the Paris Institute of Political Studies (Sciences Po), where she developed a strong interest in sustainable development and links between the environment, corruption and security issues.

Related Posts

illustration of hand holding flashlight illuminating hidden stairs

The Corporate Transparency Act: Pulling Back the Veil

February 23, 2021
King & Spalding: GC Decision Tree for Internal Investigations

King & Spalding: GC Decision Tree for Internal Investigations

February 19, 2021
mini businessmen separated by COVID particles

Compliance, Culture and COVID

February 9, 2021
closeup of gear shift with red face

Preparing for the Inevitable Regulatory Policy Shifts in Q1 2021

January 29, 2021
Next Post
The Board and IT: a User Friendly Guide

Directors and IT: a User Friendly Guide for Boards

Access realtime data
Addressing systemic racism in the workplace SAI Global
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights