No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe
Jump to a Section
  • At the Office
    • Ethics
    • HR Compliance
    • Leadership & Career
    • Well-Being at Work
  • Compliance & Risk
    • Compliance
    • FCPA
    • Fraud
    • Risk
  • Finserv & Audit
    • Financial Services
    • Internal Audit
  • Governance
    • ESG
    • Getting Governance Right
  • Infosec
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
  • Opinion
    • Adam Balfour
    • Jim DeLoach
    • Mary Shirley
    • Yan Tougas
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Ethics

Would Alito’s Defense Prevail Under the FCPA?

If this were a foreign country, would fishing trips be evidence of corruption?

by Benjamin Britz and Sean Mason
July 11, 2023
in Ethics, FCPA
alito

Attorneys Benjamin Britz and Sean Mason unwrap Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s fishy defense of a lavish, billionaire-funded trip.

For international anti-corruption lawyers and compliance professionals trained by years of vigorous enforcement activity, American domestic political practices can seem surreal.  What is criminal abroad may be acceptable, even constitutionally protected, here. 

Recent revelations that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito accepted and did not disclose gifts and hospitality from wealthy benefactors are the latest examples of the disconnect between domestic and international norms. 

According to an article by ProPublica, Alito took a fishing trip to Alaska paid for by hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer, who would later be involved in cases that came before the Supreme Court. The trip involved a seat on a private flight to Alaska, three nights at the King Salmon Lodge and meals at the lodge. Alito, in an unusual op-ed in the Wall Street Journal not long before ProPublica published its findings, defended his failure to recuse himself or disclose the trip. 

The matter raises no FCPA issues since Alito is a domestic government official, not covered by the FCPA, and the FCPA does not provide for prosecution of recipients of bribes in any case. But consider this thought experiment: What if Alito were instead a judicial official of a foreign country, let’s say the United States of Salmon? Would Singer at least be in jeopardy of having violated the FCPA? 

Let’s review the basics of an FCPA violation. There must be (1) a payment, offer or promise of (2) anything of value (3) to a “public official” (4) with “corrupt intent” (5) for the purpose of (6) assisting in obtaining or retaining business. We can presume that Alito would qualify as a “public official,” but what of the other elements?

middle finger on computer screen
Ethics

Toxic Environment: When Workplace Behavior Is Problematic But Not Illegal

by Oppenheimer Investigations Group
January 11, 2023

Though its name has origins on the playground, bullying is a very real (and risky) concern in the workplace. Morale, productivity and retention all hang in the balance when workplace culture turns toxic, and the toll extends to the bottom line, too.

Read moreDetails

Something in the sky: A thing of value

The SEC and DOJ have long been clear that lavish gifts and hospitality fit squarely within the definition of a payment of “anything of value.” The FCPA Resource Guide mentions several examples of enforcement actions where travel and entertainment have constituted a thing of value, including when “a New Jersey-based telecommunications company spent millions of dollars on approximately 315 trips for Chinese government officials, [where they] visited tourist destinations such as … Disney World, Universal Studios, and New York City.”

Justice Alito’s claim that the seat on the private plane was empty and would have gone unused if he had not accepted the invitation would likely be of little exculpatory value to Singer if this were an FCPA inquiry. The point of anti-corruption laws is to prevent bribery — not to keep would-be bribers from overspending their means. Thus, under the FCPA, there is no requirement that a gift cost something extra for the giver, just that it is a “thing of value.” A seat on a private plane is objectively valuable, and if ProPublica’s estimate is to be believed, it could have cost more than $100,000 for a one-way trip. 

Business never personal: The business purpose test

ProPublica details eight Supreme Court appeals involving litigation between the Republic of Argentina and an entity affiliated with Singer, NML Capital. In 2014, the Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal, and in June of that year, the court ruled in favor of NML Capital with Alito joining the majority. 

Justice Alito and Singer might argue, if the FCPA applied, that the purpose of the fishing trip was not to assist in “obtaining or retaining business.”  At its worst, it was for the purpose of influencing the adjudication of a lawsuit, not the award of a contract or other commercial opportunity, they might say in a letter-of-the-law argument.

However, this element is much broader than the language suggests. In United States v. Kay, the Fifth Circuit wrote that, “Congress meant to prohibit a range of payments wider than only those that directly influence the acquisition or retention of government contracts” and that Congress intended to include “assistance in improving the business opportunities of the payor or his beneficiary, irrespective of whether that assistance be direct or indirect, and irrespective of whether it be related to administering the law, awarding, extending, or renewing a contract, or executing or preserving an agreement.” The FCPA Resource Guide similarly lists “influencing the adjudication of lawsuits or enforcement actions” as an example of actions taken to obtain or retain business.

For where your treasure is, there your heart will be: Corrupt intent

To violate the FCPA, a payment must be made or offered with “corrupt intent.” This is usually defined as intent to wrongfully influence the recipient or to influence the recipient to misuse their official authority. 

Given the fact that Singer had significant business interests that hinged on questions of foreign sovereign immunity and that these questions could be decided in his favor by the Supreme Court, it is not unreasonable to ask whether Singer might have been attempting to influence Alito. 

With that in mind, what about Justice Alito’s claim that he does not know Singer well, met him only on a few occasions outside of the fishing trip and did not know of his role in the case? This seems somewhat implausible given Singer’s widely publicized involvement in the case.  

Moreover, Singer certainly knew Alito and knew that Alito sat on the US (or USS) Supreme Court in a position to potentially issue one or more decisions that could greatly affect Singer’s business interests.  In fact, Alito’s supposed unfamiliarity with Singer may actually hurt Singer’s case. If, as Alito asserts, Singer was not a friend and barely even an acquaintance, then why was Alito invited? The trip cannot be explained away as a reunion between old friends with no ulterior motives. Perhaps Alito is great company, but it seems obvious that he was invited because of his job.  

Ultimately, the best defense of the gifts may be that, given the length of time between the fishing trip and any case coming before the court, the prospect of Alito assisting Singer with a case was simply too speculative and remote to qualify as a bribe, as opposed to a “generalized hope or expectation of ultimate benefit.” That said, while the fishing trip occurred six years before this case was heard by the Supreme Court, the underlying litigation was well underway by the time Alito was invited on the fishing trip, and Singer had various legal matters that could have reached the court.

Cured or smoked?

Justice Alito wrote his op-ed in defense of his decision not to recuse himself or disclose the trip, not in defense of a potential FCPA violation, arguing that, “it was and is my judgment that these facts would not cause a reasonable and unbiased person to doubt my ability to decide the matters in question impartially.”  Whatever one thinks of that assessment, if the FCPA applied, the defense would be swimming upstream.


Previous Post

Why a Structured Program Is the Only Way to Reach Your Data Privacy Potential

Next Post

A Whole New World? Disney’s Brave Stance Shows Businesses How to Stand Up for Their Values

Benjamin Britz and Sean Mason

Benjamin Britz and Sean Mason

Benjamin Britz is a Washington-based lawyer whose practice focuses on anti-corruption litigations and investigations and advising on sensitive corporate governance and compliance issues. He is also involved in matters related to directors’ and officers’ fiduciary duties, securities fraud, corruption/FCPA and white-collar crime.
Sean Mason is a Washington-based lawyer who works primarily on litigation, anti-corruption and internal investigations and anti-money laundering matters. He also has experience in advising on domestic and international economic trade sanctions compliance and enforcement.

Related Posts

You are now registered!

Webinar: What Employee Experience Reveals About Your E&C Program

by Corporate Compliance Insights
May 16, 2025

11 a.m. - 12 p.m. ET Tuesday, June 3 Are your ethics and compliance metrics capturing what really matters? Programs...

LRN 2025 Program Maturity Global Study

2025 Global Study on Ethics & Compliance Program Maturity

by Corporate Compliance Insights
May 16, 2025

How does your ethics and compliance program measure up? Global study Ethics & Compliance Program Maturity What’s in this global...

check engine light

What Gets Measured Gets Managed, but What Actually Matters in Compliance?

by Keshonda Walker
May 16, 2025

Looking beyond standard measurements to identify the quiet signals that help compliance teams address issues before they become crises

call center mentor and caller

Telemarketing Rule Update Demands Faster Action on Consumer Opt-Outs

by Paul St. Clair
May 16, 2025

New requirements reduce opt-out processing time from 30 to 10 days and expand what qualifies as a "reasonable" consumer revocation...

Next Post
disney pride

A Whole New World? Disney’s Brave Stance Shows Businesses How to Stand Up for Their Values

No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy | AI Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights