No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe
Jump to a Section
  • At the Office
    • Ethics
    • HR Compliance
    • Leadership & Career
    • Well-Being at Work
  • Compliance & Risk
    • Compliance
    • FCPA
    • Fraud
    • Risk
  • Finserv & Audit
    • Financial Services
    • Internal Audit
  • Governance
    • ESG
    • Getting Governance Right
  • Infosec
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
  • Opinion
    • Adam Balfour
    • Jim DeLoach
    • Mary Shirley
    • Yan Tougas
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Financial Services

Why Risk Rating Customers is Problematic for Correspondent Banks

by Keith Furst
January 14, 2016
in Financial Services
Why Risk Rating Customers is Problematic for Correspondent Banks

What is a correspondent bank? A correspondent bank is a bank that provides services on behalf of another, equal or unequal, financial institution. It can facilitate wire transfers, conduct business transactions, accept deposits, and gather documents on behalf of another financial institution.

Correspondent banking could arguably be one of the most difficult business lines for AML (anti-money laundering) suspicious activity systems to monitor, but are there any opportunities for improvement and increased sophistication? The fundamental conundrum for compliance departments monitoring correspondent banking payment activity is that they must rely on the respondent bank’s AML policies, procedures, controls and technology systems to identify suspicious activity and to take appropriate steps to mitigate the risks, which could result in the respondent bank ending relationships with nefarious customers. In order to remain proactive, banks providing access to the U.S. financial markets via correspondent banking relationships should consider increasing the sophistication of how they detect suspicious activity based on what information is already contained in the wire payments and existing watch lists.

If correspondent banks are monitoring their customers’ customers, then it requires several parsing algorithms to determine several key pieces of information such as:

  • Creating pseudo account numbers based on the originator and beneficiary names and addresses referenced in the wire payments.
  • Extracting country codes for the originator of the payments and, when available, for the beneficiary as well.

For example, if three different payments are processed by the correspondent bank and the originator of the payment has a similar name as shown in the Company Name column in the table below, then how can the system determine if the company in the wire payment is the same entity or not? The purpose of this article is not to delve into the wire payment parsing algorithms for account and country extraction, but the assumption is that a correspondent bank will have some type of system deriving this information before it makes it way to the suspicious activity monitoring system.

image002

In general, most suspicious activity monitoring systems detect patterns based on the amount, velocity of activity and associated risks with the payment, such as country risk. For example, if the company ABC LTD. sent 10 wire payments between the range of $50,000 and $250,000 to five different entities all located in high-risk jurisdictions over a relatively short time period, then this could be a scenario worthy of an investigation, if no other information was available on the originating customer. One key risk indicator missing from this scenario, but part of most traditional suspicious activity monitoring systems in which the customer is on-boarded by the bank directly, is the customer risk rating. The correspondent bank only has information on the wire payment itself, but no information regarding the underlying originator and beneficiary of the payment. All payments are filtered through the bank’s sanctions monitoring tool, which will trigger alerts based on specific scenarios such as SDNs (specially designated nationals), but most monitoring systems do not integrate the respondent bank’s customer risk due to a lack of information.

However, watch lists could be leveraged to detect PEPs (politically exposed persons) and entities associated with negative news, which could range from fraud and embezzlement to possible links to terrorist groups. The watch list algorithm could be designed to assign a probability score to any potential matches in the wire payments against the watch lists. Then a bank AML/fraud investigator could review the wire payment to confirm if the name matched against the watch list is the same entity. After the confirmation from the investigator, any future payments by that entity would be under increased scrutiny and could be treated as a high-risk customer, which generally triggers alerts more often than do low-risk customers.

Negative news searches and PEP identification would be completed during most standard AML investigations if the entity triggered an alert, but the real value of this algorithm would be to identify high-risk entities “below-the-line” or under the minimum alert score threshold that aren’t triggering actual alerts.

image003

Correspondent banks could also gather valuable information about their respondent banks by establishing ratios for banks with high concentrations of PEPs and/or entities linked to negative news relative to the bank’s size or payment activity. These metrics could be referenced during the correspondent bank’s de-risking process, which may not always be intuitive because banks in low-risk jurisdictions could be initiating high-risk payments and, conversely, banks in high-risk jurisdictions could be initiating lower-risk payment activity.


Tags: AML
Previous Post

CFPB Takes a Stand on Oral Recordings

Next Post

The Top 10 Asia-Pacific FCPA Enforcement Actions of 2015

Keith Furst

Keith Furst

Keith Furst headshot (327x400)Keith Furst is Principal at Data Derivatives and has years of proven experience within a variety of financial institutions including investment banks, retail banks, payment providers, merchant acquirers and brokerage firms with a focus on technical business analysis. His forte relates to transaction monitoring, customer due diligence, fraud and trade compliance systems, and his work included custom data analytics and root cause analyses resulting in identification of suspicious activity outside of the traditional monitoring systems. His work at both Actimize and Exzac/Matrix enhanced his expertise with proven domain knowledge of related Actimize products including the modules SAM (Suspicious Activity Monitoring), CDD (Customer Due Diligence) and TC (Trade Compliance). He is skilled at bridging the requirements of risk and compliance with technology, specifically the effective implementation of support systems and related data sources required for monitoring, analysis and reporting. He is well-versed on model risk management and has performed deep-dive assessments of banking institutions policies, which resulted in enhancements to policies and model governance. With deep knowledge of SWIFT message types, he performed multiple assessments to ensure cross-border payment transparency aligns with both industry and internal policy guidelines. He holds an MBA from Baruch College, Zicklin School of Business.

Related Posts

monies illustrating money laundering

Power Shift: What Happens When America Steps Back From Global AML Enforcement?

by Joe Biddle
April 15, 2025

EU's new anti-money laundering authority emerges as potential counterweight amid uncertain US priorities

bills on clothesline money laundering

Trump 2.0 Is Already Shaking Up the Sanctions & AML Landscape

by Paul | Weiss
March 11, 2025

Financial institutions should prepare for potential ‘Know Your Customer's Customer’ obligations sanctions priorities shift

news roundup header image papers

Internal Audit Group Prepares New Third-Party Topical Requirement

by Staff and Wire Reports
March 7, 2025

Most organizations expect to increase fraud budgets

corporat ownership share concept

Treasury Halts CTA Enforcement for US Companies in Sudden Policy Reversal

by Staff and Wire Reports
March 5, 2025

Revised rule would require only ‘foreign reporting companies’ to submit beneficial ownership reports

Next Post
The Top 10 Asia-Pacific FCPA Enforcement Actions of 2015

The Top 10 Asia-Pacific FCPA Enforcement Actions of 2015

No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy | AI Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights