No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Wells Fargo Complaints Show Flaws in Federal Whistleblower Program

by Lisa Banks
December 9, 2016
in Compliance, HR Compliance
Government agencies need work to better protect whistleblowers

with co-author Mehreen Rasheed

In the wake of the Wells Fargo scandal related to the creation of millions of unauthorized customer accounts, questions have once again been raised regarding how federal regulators can better and more efficiently protect whistleblowers.

Last September, bank regulators discovered that Wells Fargo had created over 2 million accounts without customer consent or knowledge between May 2011 and July 2015.  The bank paid $185 million in civil fines. Wells Fargo employees began creating fake accounts due to extreme pressure from management, including threats of termination, to meet high sales quotas.  Many of those who complained or reported the activity were fired.  Some such terminated employees filed complaints alleging retaliation for blowing the whistle on wrongdoing.

Emerging reports indicate that swifter investigation and processing of whistleblower complaints could have brought satisfaction to the whistleblowers’ cases and uncovered the scandal earlier. As early as 2009, former Wells Fargo employees began filing complaints related to the creation of unauthorized accounts with the Department of Labor Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), the agency responsible for investigating complaints of whistleblower retaliation brought under various statutes. Former employees reported being fired and otherwise retaliated against after reporting the wrongdoing. As of early October 2016, OSHA had not closed 34 of the 91 whistleblower retaliation complaints it had received from Wells Fargo employees since 2002, although the number of complaints related to the current scandal remains unclear.

Delays and long waits for complainants are common given the breadth of OSHA’s mandate and the volume of whistleblower complaints filed. OSHA’s Whistleblower Protection Program is the first responder for whistleblower complaints brought under 22 federal statutes across various industries, including the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA), part of the Dodd-Frank Act. Last year alone, OSHA received over 3,000 whistleblower complaints, and this year’s number is likely to be greater still. The workload, however, is borne by only 88 full-time investigators in OSHA’s 10 regional offices nationwide.

Whistleblowers typically file complaints with OSHA after experiencing an adverse employment action as a result of opposing or refusing to take part in their employer’s wrongdoing. When OSHA receives a complaint, it must conduct an investigation within a specified 30-, 60- or 90-day time limit, depending on the statute implicated. Based on the investigation, OSHA will either dismiss the complaint or issue an order requiring the employer to take some remedial action. In some cases, OSHA also sends a copy of the complaint to the relevant regulatory agency to open their own investigation into the substance of the whistleblower’s complaint. Under the CFPA, OSHA is required to notify the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Under-Resourced and Backlogged

Criticism of OSHA’s inadequate resources and slow-moving pace is not new. The agency has undergone at least five internal and external reviews in the last five years, all of which have found that OSHA’s whistleblower program was understaffed and lacked resources to adequately investigate cases.[1]

Last year, the Department of Labor (DOL) Office of Inspector General (OIG) again reviewed OSHA’s whistleblower program. While OSHA had made significant strides in conducting sufficient investigations, the increasing backlog continued to be a problem. The OIG found that OSHA did not complete 72 percent of investigations within the statutorily prescribed time limits. Investigators missed deadlines by an average of 163 days — a rate that had grown in the last five years—due in part to a failure to promptly assign cases to investigators.

Significantly, the agency often failed to share the substance of the whistleblower’s complaint with the federal agencies responsible for enforcement, despite a statutory mandate in some cases to do so. According to the report, OSHA lacked a mandatory and formal process to communicate the substance of the reports with these agencies. OIG’s recommendations included a call for better oversight of investigators, subject-matter training and a formal process to report information to external agencies in a timely fashion.

Last September, DOL Secretary Thomas Perez said that the department would again be conducting a “top-to-bottom” review of the prior Wells Fargo complaints.

The Road Ahead

If the years of audits and reviews make anything clear, it is that OSHA is in need of sufficient resources and a robust system to ensure streamlined and thorough investigations from start to finish, as well as organized and timely communication with other federal agencies. Members of Congress made headlines with their rebukes of Wells Fargo for the recent scandal, and of OSHA for its failings, but this outcry should also act as an incentive for Congress to ensure that OSHA and other regulators have adequate funding and resources. OSHA and other agencies must also ensure better communication in order to seize the first possible opportunity to uncover and stop wrongdoing.

With a new administration and session of Congress on the horizon, the future of whistleblower protection is unclear.  Some have speculated that President-elect Trump’s administration may attempt to eliminate OSHA’s jurisdiction over some of the 22 statutes it oversees, or increase the burden of proof whistleblowers must meet. It’s also possible that whistleblower protections and oversight will be strengthened to better protect against the kinds of fraud, waste and abuse these statutes were designed to prevent.  While the direction of the new administration and Congress has yet to be seen, it is fairly certain that changes will come.

[1] Dep’t of Labor Office of the Inspector General, 02-15-202-10-105, OSHA Needs to Continue to Strengthen Its Whistleblower Protection Programs (2015), https://www.oig.dol.gov/public/reports/oa/2015/02-15-202-10-105.pdf; Dep’t of Labor Office of the Inspector General, 02-10-202-10-105, Complaints Did Not Always Receive Appropriate Investigations Under the Whistleblower Protection Program (2010),  http://www.oig.dol.gov/public/reports/oa/2010/02-10-202-10-105.pdf; U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, GA0-10-722, Whistleblower Protection: Sustained Management Attention Needed to Address Long-Standing Program Weaknesses (2010), http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10722.pdf; U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, GA0-09-106, Whistleblower Protection Program: Better Data And Improved Oversight Would Help Ensure Program Quality And Consistency (2009), http://www.gao.gov/assets/290/285189.pdf.


Previous Post

SEC Amends Rules Affecting Intrastate and Small Exempt Offerings

Next Post

Top 10 Risks for 2017

Lisa Banks

Lisa Banks

Lisa BanksLisa J. Banks is a founding partner with the whistleblower and employment law firm Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP, in Washington, D.C. She concentrates her practice on claims related to whistleblower retaliation, SEC and CFTC whistleblower tips, employment discrimination, sexual harassment, Title IX and contractual employment disputes. She is co-author of the comprehensive whistleblower law treatise Whistleblower Law: A Practitioner’s Guide, an exhaustive guide to the dozens of federal and state whistleblower law affecting virtually every industry in the country, and has also published the CFTC Whistleblower Practice Guide, a comprehensive handbook for CFTC whistleblowers and their lawyers. Ms. Banks earned her law degree from the University of Denver College of Law. She can be reached at banks@kmblegal.com.

Related Posts

growth what next

Growing Pains: Mid-Sized Auditing Firms Are Seeing an Influx of New Clients, But at What Cost?

by Jey Purushotham
January 25, 2023

The era of exponential growth among mid-tier accounting firms is upon us, driven largely by the trend of top-tier firms...

board tech purchase

Directors: Don’t Approve a Tech Purchase Without Asking These Questions

by Jean Hill
January 25, 2023

Board directors don’t need to be able to fix a broken server, but they do need basic technology competence, which...

frayed_white

New Year, Same ESG Challenges: Overstretched Boards Face Barrage of Global Regulation

by Helle Bank Jorgensen
January 25, 2023

Global economic uncertainty notwithstanding, 2023 is certain to bring a host of emerging risks for board directors to navigate. One...

doj sign front

4 Practical Tips for Complying With Monaco Memo

by Jennifer Kennedy Park
January 25, 2023

Preparing for expectations under the Monaco memo is easier said than done, but Jennifer Kennedy Park, an expert in white-collar...

Next Post
the greatest risks to companies today

Top 10 Risks for 2017

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT