Tuesday, January 19, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Ethics

Some Reflections on Cheating in Business

by Jim Nortz
June 11, 2015
in Ethics
Some Reflections on Cheating in Business

This article appeared previously Association of Corporate Counsel’s ACC Docket and is published here with permission from the journal.

In 1994, I left the Army JAG Corps Environmental Law Division and joined the corporate world as senior environmental counsel for a multinational chemical company. About a year or so into my tenure as a civilian, I discovered that the tank farm at one of our plants lacked sufficient secondary containment and was in violation of the Clean Water Act. Upon making this discovery, I spoke with the head of our engineering department to discuss how we could work together with the plant management to put a project plan together to address this issue. My colleague in the engineering department told me that they were well aware of the secondary containment deficiencies at the plant and had, in fact, developed a $5 million corrective action plan.

Delighted to hear that a plan had already been developed, I proposed that we hold hands and go to the senior management team to get the project approved so we could bring the plant into compliance with the law. My friend in engineering smiled wanly and began to chuckle a bit. When I asked what was so funny, he said: “Nothing. But management is never going to approve this project. We’ve laid this one on the table in the past, and they have other plans for that money — like paying bonuses and shareholder dividends.”

Sadly, my colleague was right. For the following 10 years, until the plant was closed, no money was ever allocated for this project. As a consequence, the corporation had cheated and won. It enjoyed the time value of $5 million for the decades the plant was in operation and paid no penalty. In so doing, they enjoyed an advantage over those competitors who chose to make expenditures necessary to comply with the law.

As I look back on this episode in my career, I can still feel the forces at play in the company that seemed to make resistance to the status quo futile — if not career-limiting. Nevertheless, I regret that I lacked the courage or the organizational savvy to do a better job as corporate counsel in persuading my client to comply with the law. Given the ubiquity of cheating in business, evidenced by the weekly news reports of multimillion- and multibillion-dollar fines levied against firms caught in the act, I’m supposing that many other corporate counsel have had a similar experience. So the question is, when we see our client cheating, what is our most principled and effective response? Dan Ariely’s book “The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty – How We Lie to Everyone – Especially Ourselves” provides some useful insights.

Depressingly, Ariely’s research evidenced that the vast majority of us cheat when we think we can get away with it and that we seem to have little difficulty finding rationalizations to support our misdeeds. Moreover, the prevalence of cheating increases significantly when the cheater is part of our own social group (like a work colleague) and is further heightened if the cheater is an authority figure. Ariely also discovered that cheating behaviors spread like a virus from one person to another and that we tend to cheat more when doing so benefits others. Given the fact that these circumstances are quite common in business, these findings show that we, as corporate counsel, have our work cut out for us. However, this knowledge also indicates how we can be more effective at our jobs. The following are some ideas you might take into consideration in advising your corporate client the next time they begin to head in the wrong direction:

Hang on tightly to your moral compass

If we take Ariely’s findings seriously, we need to face the fact that we are as just as prone as our colleagues to catch the cheating bug and rationalize our own wrongdoing. Nothing we learned in law school inoculates us from this human weakness. Perhaps the best way to guard against falling into this trap is to recognize our own vulnerability, maintain constant vigilance for such pitfalls and never let go of our moral compass, no matter how rugged the terrain.

Be organizationally savvy

In my experience, finger wagging and sanctimonious pontificating are not particularly effective ways to persuade a client to change course. This is especially true in large organizations where many of your clients are your superiors and, more often than not, have fairly sensitive egos. Instead, when you see things heading off the rails, close your office door and think very carefully about your most effective course of action. Specifically, write down the answers to the following critical questions:

  • What additional facts do I need to make sure I don’t go into this half-cocked?
  • How can I best get these facts?
  • What are my client’s motivations, needs and fears? What do they have to gain or lose in the circumstances? What do they have at stake?
  • What assumptions, rationalizations or justifications might my client have for taking their position?
  • Whom are my likely allies?
  • Whom are my likely opponents?
  • Whom should I talk to and in what order?
  • What will I say to them and what is their likely response?
  • How can I best frame the issue to persuade my client to change course?
  • What is the most effective way for me to communicate with my client?

Don’t take another step until these questions are answered and you have formulated a good plan of action.

Remain calm and flexible

One of the fastest ways to lose credibility when advising a client is to get emotional. When you show emotion, others can more easily discount what you say. Conversely, there is nothing more persuasive to a client than a cogent, well-informed, rational and calmly delivered argument. Also, don’t posture yourself as the only one with the answer. Not only does this turn people off, it may also blind you to the possibility of alternative strategies that could be as good as or superior to the ones you’re recommending. It is often better to begin an important client meeting with questions rather than answers. One of Ariely’s key findings about cheating is that the most effective prevention to this scourge is “monitoring” to reduce the chances that individuals can cheat with impunity. This difficult and thankless task often falls on us as corporate counsel because our colleagues count on us every day to guide them in the right direction — even if doing so means telling them things they don’t want to hear. All will benefit if we play this role effectively.


Previous Post

Achieving Collaborative GRC Accountability: the Power of Convergence

Next Post

Hiperos Announces Automated Training of Third Parties in Anti-Bribery/Anti-Corruption

Jim Nortz

Jim NortzJim Nortz is Founder & President of Axiom Compliance & Ethics Solutions LLC, a firm dedicated to driving ethical excellence by helping organizations implement effective compliance and ethics programs. Jim is a nationally recognized expert and thought leader in the field of business ethics and compliance with over a decade of experience serving multinational petrochemical, staffing, business process outsourcing, pharmaceutical and medical device corporations. Jim spent the first 17 years of his career as a criminal and civil litigator and Senior Corporate Counsel before becoming Crompton Corporation’s first Vice President, Business Ethics and Compliance in 2003. Since then, Jim has served as a compliance officer at Crompton and for five other multinational corporations, the most recent of which was as Chief Compliance Officer at Carestream Health. Jim has extensive experience in implementing world-class compliance and ethics programs sufficiently robust to withstand U.S. Department of Justice scrutiny. Jim is a frequent guest lecturer at the University of Rochester’s Simon School of Business, RIT’s Saunders School of Business, St. John Fisher College, Nazareth College and other law schools, universities and organizations around the country. Jim writes the monthly business ethics columns for the Association of Corporate Counsel Docket magazine and the Rochester Business Journal. Jim is a National Association of Corporate Directors Fellow, a member of the International Association of Independent Corporate Monitors and serves on the Board of Directors of the Rochester Chapter of Conscious Capitalism as the Board’s Secretary and Chair of the Governance and Nomination Committee. Previously, Jim served on the Board of Directors for the Ethics and Compliance Officers Association and the Board of the Rochester Area Business Ethics Foundation.

Related Posts

Trump supporters on the steps of the Capitol

Trump, the Coup, and Corporate Ethics

January 11, 2021
Book Review: Grappling With The Gray

Book Review: Grappling With The Gray

December 18, 2020
edison bulb

The 7 Principles of Ethical Leadership

December 14, 2020
model blue VW van upside down in a puddle

Critical Lessons from the Volkswagen Scandal

September 11, 2020
Next Post
Hiperos Announces Automated Training of Third Parties in Anti-Bribery/Anti-Corruption

Hiperos Announces Automated Training of Third Parties in Anti-Bribery/Anti-Corruption

Access realtime data

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management culture of ethics cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights