No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe
Jump to a Section
  • At the Office
    • Ethics
    • HR Compliance
    • Leadership & Career
    • Well-Being at Work
  • Compliance & Risk
    • Compliance
    • FCPA
    • Fraud
    • Risk
  • Finserv & Audit
    • Financial Services
    • Internal Audit
  • Governance
    • ESG
    • Getting Governance Right
  • Infosec
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
  • Opinion
    • Adam Balfour
    • Jim DeLoach
    • Mary Shirley
    • Yan Tougas
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil?

by Wendy Wysong
September 22, 2016
in Compliance
Limited protections for Australian whistleblowers breeds a culture of silence

with contributing authors Jenni Hill, Kirsten Scott and Lara Gotti

When it comes to lifting the lid on corruption in the private sector, Australian legislation does little to protect whistleblowers. The sage advice, hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, appears to have taken hold and created a culture of silence in Australia’s corporate environment.

A Lonely Place for Whistleblowers

Foreign bribery investigations in Australia are conducted primarily by the Australian Federal Police (AFP), which has responsibility for the investigation of these offenses under the Criminal Code (Cth). However, unlike many of its overseas counterparts, the code offers no statutory protection for whistleblowers.

The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) offers the only legislative protection for whistleblowers in Australia. And that protection is limited, covering disclosure only of offenses against “corporations legislation.” The process for reporting in Australia is also restrictive, as the whistleblower is only protected if they report to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), an auditor or specific persons within a company. Those protections do not extend to anonymous complaints. Once a complaint is made, legislative protections include the confidentiality of identity and information, protection against litigation, a prohibition against victimization and compensation as a result of any victimization.

ASIC will only become involved in investigations of foreign bribery in limited circumstances, such as where issues of disclosure, breaches of directors’ duties and possibly the adequacy of books and records are raised. Thus, responsibility for investigations of foreign bribery allegations falls mainly with the AFP.

A whistleblower who approaches ASIC with allegations of foreign bribery involving senior officers of their company will be protected by the Act. However, if ASIC decides the subject matter does not properly fall within their jurisdiction and refers the matter to the AFP, the whistleblower will lose the protection of confidentiality and anti-retaliation under the Act.

Culture of Silence

The April 2016 Senate Economics References Committee issues paper described as “unacceptable” the perceived “cultures of silence” which are said to plague the corporate sector in Australia. Employees told the Committee how they “had to sacrifice their careers in order to expose greed, dishonesty and gross misconduct.” Subsequent political debate about Australia’s legislative regime has not ruled out the U.S.-style “reward” system. The federal government has acknowledged that whistleblower protection laws could be strengthened.

A Louder Whistle

In contrast to the Australian system, where very few actions are taken on the basis of whistleblower complaints, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has received thousands of whistleblower tips each year that have yielded results. Their program allows whistleblowers who help recover amounts in excess of US$1 million to receive up to 30 percent of those recouped funds.

Interestingly, Australians appear to have an appetite for the U.S. system. The latest report on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program shows that the SEC received whistleblower tips from 95 countries outside the United States. The highest number of non-U.S. whistleblower tips last year came from (in order) the U.K., Canada, China, India and Australia.

The U.S. legislation also provides more protection for private sector whistleblowers. There are prohibitions against retaliation, avenues the whistleblower may take if retaliation occurs (including further financial implications for the company), as well as greater confidentiality safeguards. While Australian legislation affords these protections on paper, they are more restrictive and have been criticized since their introduction.

Blowing the Whistle

Whistleblowers, regardless of the legislative framework, should always consider taking legal advice prior to any disclosures. The assessment of whether a person qualifies for whistleblower protections under relevant legislation must be considered and weighed against the ramifications for that individual, such as alleged breaches of confidentiality and relevant legislation. The whistleblower must realize the gravity of the forces and institutions they may be taking on.

From an organizational perspective, it is important to have adequate reporting frameworks and appropriate whistleblowing procedures in place to encourage employees to protect the integrity of the company. Policies and programs that provide regular training and internal checks should be developed. Due diligence on third parties must be undertaken regularly to ensure compliance with Australian standards, particularly where these third parties operate in countries with corporate compliance laws that fall short of the Australian standards.  Finally, appropriate action in accordance with established practices must be undertaken when an employee reports suspicious activity.

Creating an environment of compliance is essential regardless of the legislative protections afforded to those who lift the lid on corruption.


Previous Post

Accusation Superhighway: Is IC3 Hurting Emerging Online Businesses?

Next Post

Whistleblowing 2.0

Wendy Wysong

Wendy Wysong

Wendy L. Wysong is a partner at Steptoe & Johnson. She served previously as a litigation partner with Clifford Chance, offering clients advice and representation on compliance and enforcement under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Arms Export Control Act, International Traffic in Arms Regulations, Export Administration Regulations, and OFAC Economic Sanctions. She was appointed by the State Department as the ITAR Special Compliance Official for Xe Services (formerly Blackwater) in 2010. Wendy combines her experience as a former federal prosecutor with the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia for 16 years with her regulatory background as the former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement at the Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce. She managed its enforcement program and was involved in the development and implementation of foreign policy through export controls across the administration, including the Departments of Justice, State, Treasury and Homeland Security, as well as the intelligence community. Wendy received her law degree in 1984 from the University of Virginia School of Law, where she was a member of the University of Virginia Law Review.

Related Posts

SmartSearch Daon Partnership

SmartSearch Partners With Daon for Enhanced ID Verification

by Corporate Compliance Insights
June 19, 2025

UK digital compliance provider SmartSearch has partnered with digital identity company Daon to integrate AI-powered biometric identity technology into its...

Ondato Media Screening Launch

Ondato Launches AI-Powered Adverse Media Screening for AML Compliance

by Corporate Compliance Insights
June 19, 2025

Global online ID verification provider Ondato has released an AI-powered adverse media screening feature that automatically scans online sources for...

Supply Wisdom Series B Funding

Supply Wisdom Raises $14M in Series B Funding

by Corporate Compliance Insights
June 19, 2025

Third-party risk monitoring provider Supply Wisdom has closed a $14 million Series B funding round led by Jurassic Capital that...

doj distorted

FCPA Enforcement Back on at DOJ — With a New Look

by Jennifer L. Gaskin
June 18, 2025

After a shorter-than-expected pause, officials with the DOJ have formally renewed the department’s enforcement of the FCPA. CCI’s Jennifer L....

Next Post
Compliance programs are bolstered by whistleblowing mechanisms

Whistleblowing 2.0

No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy | AI Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights