Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil?

by Wendy Wysong
September 22, 2016
in Compliance
Limited protections for Australian whistleblowers breeds a culture of silence

with contributing authors Jenni Hill, Kirsten Scott and Lara Gotti

When it comes to lifting the lid on corruption in the private sector, Australian legislation does little to protect whistleblowers. The sage advice, hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, appears to have taken hold and created a culture of silence in Australia’s corporate environment.

A Lonely Place for Whistleblowers

Foreign bribery investigations in Australia are conducted primarily by the Australian Federal Police (AFP), which has responsibility for the investigation of these offenses under the Criminal Code (Cth). However, unlike many of its overseas counterparts, the code offers no statutory protection for whistleblowers.

The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) offers the only legislative protection for whistleblowers in Australia. And that protection is limited, covering disclosure only of offenses against “corporations legislation.” The process for reporting in Australia is also restrictive, as the whistleblower is only protected if they report to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), an auditor or specific persons within a company. Those protections do not extend to anonymous complaints. Once a complaint is made, legislative protections include the confidentiality of identity and information, protection against litigation, a prohibition against victimization and compensation as a result of any victimization.

ASIC will only become involved in investigations of foreign bribery in limited circumstances, such as where issues of disclosure, breaches of directors’ duties and possibly the adequacy of books and records are raised. Thus, responsibility for investigations of foreign bribery allegations falls mainly with the AFP.

A whistleblower who approaches ASIC with allegations of foreign bribery involving senior officers of their company will be protected by the Act. However, if ASIC decides the subject matter does not properly fall within their jurisdiction and refers the matter to the AFP, the whistleblower will lose the protection of confidentiality and anti-retaliation under the Act.

Culture of Silence

The April 2016 Senate Economics References Committee issues paper described as “unacceptable” the perceived “cultures of silence” which are said to plague the corporate sector in Australia. Employees told the Committee how they “had to sacrifice their careers in order to expose greed, dishonesty and gross misconduct.” Subsequent political debate about Australia’s legislative regime has not ruled out the U.S.-style “reward” system. The federal government has acknowledged that whistleblower protection laws could be strengthened.

A Louder Whistle

In contrast to the Australian system, where very few actions are taken on the basis of whistleblower complaints, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has received thousands of whistleblower tips each year that have yielded results. Their program allows whistleblowers who help recover amounts in excess of US$1 million to receive up to 30 percent of those recouped funds.

Interestingly, Australians appear to have an appetite for the U.S. system. The latest report on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program shows that the SEC received whistleblower tips from 95 countries outside the United States. The highest number of non-U.S. whistleblower tips last year came from (in order) the U.K., Canada, China, India and Australia.

The U.S. legislation also provides more protection for private sector whistleblowers. There are prohibitions against retaliation, avenues the whistleblower may take if retaliation occurs (including further financial implications for the company), as well as greater confidentiality safeguards. While Australian legislation affords these protections on paper, they are more restrictive and have been criticized since their introduction.

Blowing the Whistle

Whistleblowers, regardless of the legislative framework, should always consider taking legal advice prior to any disclosures. The assessment of whether a person qualifies for whistleblower protections under relevant legislation must be considered and weighed against the ramifications for that individual, such as alleged breaches of confidentiality and relevant legislation. The whistleblower must realize the gravity of the forces and institutions they may be taking on.

From an organizational perspective, it is important to have adequate reporting frameworks and appropriate whistleblowing procedures in place to encourage employees to protect the integrity of the company. Policies and programs that provide regular training and internal checks should be developed. Due diligence on third parties must be undertaken regularly to ensure compliance with Australian standards, particularly where these third parties operate in countries with corporate compliance laws that fall short of the Australian standards.  Finally, appropriate action in accordance with established practices must be undertaken when an employee reports suspicious activity.

Creating an environment of compliance is essential regardless of the legislative protections afforded to those who lift the lid on corruption.


Previous Post

Accusation Superhighway: Is IC3 Hurting Emerging Online Businesses?

Next Post

Whistleblowing 2.0

Wendy Wysong

Wendy L. Wysong, a litigation partner with Clifford Chance, maintains offices in Hong Kong and Washington D.C.  She offers clients advice and representation on compliance and enforcement under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Arms Export Control Act, International Traffic in Arms Regulations, Export Administration Regulations, and OFAC Economic Sanctions.  She was appointed by the State Department as the ITAR Special Compliance Official for Xe Services (formerly Blackwater) in 2010.

Ms. Wysong combines her experience as a former federal prosecutor with the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia for 16 years with her regulatory background as the former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement at the Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce.  She managed its enforcement program and was involved in the development and implementation of foreign policy through export controls across the administration, including the Departments of Justice, State, Treasury, and Homeland Security, as well as the intelligence community.]

Ms. Wysong received her law degree in 1984 from the University of Virginia School of Law, where she was a member of the University of Virginia Law Review.

Contact information:

Wendy L. Wysong
Clifford Chance
28th Floor Jardine House
One Connaught Place
Hong Kong
+852 2826 3460
+852 9280 3612 (cell)

And

2001 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
+1 202 912 5030
+1 202 290 7634
[email protected]

Related Posts

new york city skyline at sunset

The Early Days: The Birth of the Independent Monitoring Concept

December 11, 2019
job candidates awaiting inerview

An Unconventional Interview Question: “Do You Have an HR Department?”

December 5, 2019
closeup of magnifying glass on gray background

DiCianni’s Idea: How It All Got Started

December 4, 2019
woman's hand touching beam of light on digital blue screen

The Evolution of Compliance

December 3, 2019
Next Post
Compliance programs are bolstered by whistleblowing mechanisms

Whistleblowing 2.0

Free Downloads

OFAC whitepaper cover
Compliance Job Interview Q&A
Reputation Risk Management Research

RSS SEC Litigation News

  • Nanotech Engineering, Inc., Michael James Sweaney (also known as Michael Hatton), David Sweaney, and Jeffery Gange December 11, 2019
    SEC Obtains Asset Freeze to Halt Alleged Offering Fraud
  • Harpreet Grewal December 10, 2019
    SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Former Online Marketing Company Executive
  • Christopher Collins, et al. December 10, 2019
    Former Congressman and Two Others Settle Insider Trading Charges

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks Big Data blockchain board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management corporate culture corporate governance culture of ethics cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making Dodd-Frank DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit internet of things (IoT) KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • Audit
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • HR Compliance
  • Leadership and Career
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights