Friday, December 6, 2019
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

FinCEN Issues New Beneficial Ownership Regulations

by Michael Volkov
June 1, 2016
in Compliance
Financial institutions are new customer due diligence requirements

This article was republished with permission from Michael Volkov’s blog, Corruption, Crime & Compliance.

Under the dark cover of the Panama Papers scandal, FinCEN moved quickly to issue its beneficial ownership regulations. For all of the U.S. regulatory and financial industry bluster, it is about time. The United States stands far behind other countries in requiring transparency with regard to financial ownership. It is unfortunate that it took the Panama Papers scandal to give FinCEN the political opportunity to move the long-stalled beneficial ownership regulations.

With that being said, there are some important issues to highlight in the newly-adopted regulations. First and most significantly, the new rules are not effective for two years, or until May 11, 2018.

The new customer due diligence (CDD) rules require covered financial institutions, including banks, credit unions, broker-dealers, mutual funds, futures merchants and a host of other entities, to identify the natural persons who own and control legal entities, commonly referred to as “beneficial owners.”

The rule imposes a number of requirements with respect to the documentation and identification of owners of “legal entity customers” (e.g. corporations, limited liability companies, general partnerships and other entities). The definition of “legal entity customers” does not include investment advisers and other entities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For each customer that opens an account, including existing customers, the financial institution must identify the beneficial owners using a two-prong test: an ownership prong and a control prong.

Specifically, the financial institution must identify:

  • Each individual who owns 25 percent or more of the equity interests in the legal entity; and
  • At least one individual who exercises significant managerial control over the customer.

Of course, the same individual may be identified under both prongs. If no individual owns 25 percent or more of the entity, the financial institution may identify only one person who satisfies the managerial control prong. The financial institution must verify the identity of each beneficial owner.

A key component of the new regulations is the ability of a financial institution to rely on the certification regarding the individual’s status as a beneficial owner. However, the financial institution must obtain personal identifying information about each beneficial owner. This information must be documented and preserved in the bank’s files. The regulations include a sample form for collecting such information, but banks are free to develop their own forms, so long as they collect the required information.

In response to significant industry concerns, FinCEN carved out any monitoring requirement for beneficial ownership information. In other words, even if the bank learns of new information that may conflict with prior beneficial ownership information, the bank is not required to refresh its beneficial ownership information unless the customer opens a new account. To the extent that the bank learns such information in accordance with existing monitoring programs, however, the bank will be required to update its files regarding the client’s beneficial ownership.




Trace Public




Interestingly, at the same time that it adopted the new beneficial ownership rules, FinCEN issues a proposed rule-making to require financial institutions to identify beneficial owners of foreign-owned, single-member LLCs. FinCEN noted that this requirement would close a current loophole in the system that allows a foreign person to use LLCs in the United States to hide assets both in the U.S. and outside the U.S.


Tags: business ethics leadership leadership alliance
Previous Post

Get More Without Settling for Less

Next Post

New Resilient Podcast Series Explores the Stories of Executives in the Midst of Risk, Disruption and Crisis

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan

Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at [email protected].

Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

job candidates awaiting inerview

An Unconventional Interview Question: “Do You Have an HR Department?”

December 5, 2019
closeup of magnifying glass on gray background

DiCianni’s Idea: How It All Got Started

December 4, 2019
woman's hand touching beam of light on digital blue screen

The Evolution of Compliance

December 3, 2019
"fire drill" words beside flashing strobe

How M&A Benefits from Independent Assessment

November 20, 2019
Next Post
New Resilient Podcast Series Explores the Stories of Executives in the Midst of Risk, Disruption and Crisis

New Resilient Podcast Series Explores the Stories of Executives in the Midst of Risk, Disruption and Crisis

Free Downloads

OFAC whitepaper cover
Compliance Job Interview Q&A
Reputation Risk Management Research

RSS SEC Litigation News

  • Iconix Brand Group, Inc., Neil R. Cole and Seth Horowitz December 5, 2019
    SEC Charges Iconix Brand Group and Former Top Executives with Accounting Fraud
  • Lester Burroughs December 5, 2019
    SEC Charges Connecticut Man with Defrauding Retail Investors
  • SBB Research Group LLC, et al. December 4, 2019
    SEC Charges Hedge Fund Adviser and Top Executives with Fraud

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks Big Data blockchain board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management corporate culture corporate governance culture of ethics cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making Dodd-Frank DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit internet of things (IoT) KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • Audit
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • HR Compliance
  • Leadership and Career
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights