No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe
Jump to a Section
  • At the Office
    • Ethics
    • HR Compliance
    • Leadership & Career
    • Well-Being at Work
  • Compliance & Risk
    • Compliance
    • FCPA
    • Fraud
    • Risk
  • Finserv & Audit
    • Financial Services
    • Internal Audit
  • Governance
    • ESG
    • Getting Governance Right
  • Infosec
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
  • Opinion
    • Adam Balfour
    • Jim DeLoach
    • Mary Shirley
    • Yan Tougas
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Revved-Up Guidance on EV Tax Break Running Straight Into Brick Wall?

Treasury, IRS seek to define some criteria around EV components, but others left untouched for now

by Robert J. Gardner and P. Lee Smith
April 19, 2023
in Compliance
ev charging station_f

New guidance on electric vehicle tax breaks seeks to clarify what criteria a purchase will need to meet for a taxpayer to benefit. Guidance on materials is a welcome sight, but Robert J. Gardner and P. Lee Smith of Baker Donelson are left wondering about a key omission.

The U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS released proposed guidance related to the 30D credit, which extends as much as $7,500 in consumer tax breaks for cars that meet criteria on their MSRP, their buyer’s income, where their components come from and where the vehicles are assembled.

The most controversial requirements are focused on the components and minerals within the battery, and the proposed rule addresses these requirements, hewing close to a Treasury whitepaper last year. The guidance also makes clear that deals to include Japan and the EU within the credit’s definition of “free trade agreement” country are moving forward. 

illustration of ESG stakeholders in the style of Crossing the Delaware
Compliance

The Energy Revolution Is Underway: Is Your Company a Player?

by Jim DeLoach
August 10, 2022

Informed organizations in all industries are establishing carbon emissions reduction and net-zero targets. Protiviti’s Jim DeLoach explores how strategic conversations in the C-suite and boardroom have an important role to play.

Read moreDetails

While the proposed rule provides much-needed clarity around how to meet the critical minerals and battery components requirements, it does not clarify the most constraining requirement in the 30D credit — the avoidance of foreign entities of concern (FEOC).

In 2024 and 2025, the 30D tax credit will become even more stringent as provisions go into effect prohibiting the sourcing of any battery parts and critical minerals from “foreign entities of concern,” which will include those with ties to China. Administration officials have stated that guidance on the FEOC provision would not be released until later this year.

Interested parties may file comments on this proposed rule by June 16, 2023.

Critical minerals

The guidance would provide a three-step process for determining the percentage of the value of the applicable critical minerals in a battery that goes toward meeting the minerals requirement.

Step 1: Determine procurement chains: Guidance defines “procurement chain” as a common sequence of extraction, processing or recycling activities that occur in a common set of locations, concluding in the production of constituent materials. The guidance defines “extraction,” “processing,” “recycling,” “value” and “value added.”

Step 2: Identify qualifying critical minerals: Manufacturers would determine whether critical minerals procured from the chain have been 1) extracted or processed in the United States, or in any country with which the U.S. has a free trade agreement in effect, or 2) recycled in North America.

An applicable critical mineral would be treated as extracted or processed in the U.S., or in any country with which the U.S. has a free trade agreement in effect, if: (1) 50% or more of the value added to the applicable critical mineral by extraction is derived from extraction that occurred in the U.S. or in a free-trade country, or (2) 50% or more of the value added to the applicable critical mineral by processing is derived from action that occurred in the U.S. or a free trade partner. An applicable critical mineral would be treated as recycled in North America if 50% or more of the value added by recycling is derived from action that occurred in North America. A few key issues:

  1. Notably there would be a transition rule for the proposed 50% value-added test that would serve that purpose for vehicles placed in service in 2023 and 2024. For later years, however, Treasury and the IRS anticipate moving to a more stringent test. Treasury is requesting comments on this more stringent test.
  2. Treasury provided flexibility in how it interprets the IRA’s requirements regarding free trade agreements (FTAs). The proposed guidance defines the metal powders contained in an EV battery’s electrodes as “critical minerals,” rather than “battery components.” Defining them as battery components would have imposed even more severe restrictions on vehicles eligible for the credit.
      
  3. Treasury opened the door for a broader range of U.S. allies to qualify as trading partners under the critical minerals requirement. The guidance allows countries to qualify for the credit if they have made narrower agreements with the U.S. on trade in critical minerals. Japan signed such an agreement in March, allowing Treasury to add it to its list of approved suppliers. Trade negotiators from the U.S. and EU are trying to work out a similar agreement. The two sides hope to complete it by the time the Treasury publishes the final guidance. Current FTAs are in place with Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Jordan, Korea, Mexico, Morocco, Nicaragua, Oman, Panama, Peru and Singapore. 

Step 3: Calculate qualifying critical mineral content: Involves calculating the percentage by value of qualifying critical minerals contained in a battery. This would require qualified manufacturers to select a date for determining the values associated with the total value of qualifying critical minerals (determined separately for each procurement chain) and the total value of critical minerals. They could do this in two ways — 1) a qualified manufacturer may determine qualifying critical mineral content based on the value of the applicable critical minerals actually contained in the battery of a specific vehicle, or 2) for purposes of calculating the qualifying critical mineral content for batteries in a group of vehicles, a qualified manufacturer could average the qualifying critical mineral content calculation over a limited period of time (for example, a year, quarter or month) with respect to vehicles from the same model line, plant, class or some combination.

Battery components

The guidance provides a four-step process for determining the percentage by value of the battery components that contribute toward meeting the battery components requirement.

Step 1: Identify components that are manufactured or assembled in North America: These are defined in proposed §1.30D-3(c)(12) as a battery component where substantially all of the manufacturing or assembly of which occurs in North America, without regard to the location of the manufacturing or assembly activities of constituent components. The guidance defines “battery,” “battery cell,” “battery component,” “assembly” and “manufacturing.”

Step 2: Determine the incremental value of each battery component and North American battery components: Qualified manufacturers would need to determine the incremental value for each battery component. The guidance would define “incremental value” of a battery component by subtracting from the value of that component the value of the manufactured or assembled battery components, if any, that are contained in that battery component.

Step 3: Determine the total incremental value of battery components: This could also be calculated by totaling the value of each battery module in the battery.

Step 4: Calculate the qualifying battery component content: A qualified manufacturer may determine qualifying battery component content based on the incremental values of the battery components actually contained in the battery of a specific vehicle. Alternatively, for purposes of calculating the qualifying battery component content for batteries in a group of vehicles, a qualified manufacturer could average the qualifying battery component content calculation over a limited period of time (for example, a year, quarte, or month) with respect to vehicles from the same model line, plant, class or some combination of thereof, with final assembly (as defined in section 30D(d)(5) of the code and proposed §1.30D-2(a)) within North America.


Tags: ESG
Previous Post

Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Ethical Leadership in the Hybrid Age

Next Post

3 Keys for Tough Times: Relevance, Culture and Alignment

Robert J. Gardner and P. Lee Smith

Robert J. Gardner and P. Lee Smith

Robert J. Gardner is an adviser in Baker Donelson's Washington, D.C., office, working with clients to develop and implement strategies to achieve their legislative and government relations goals.
P. Lee Smith is leader of Baker Donelson's international trade and national security practice and advises clients on matters involving export controls, customs compliance, trade remedy investigations, trade policy, market access and free trade agreement interpretation.

Related Posts

green sprint racers on a track

‘Green Sprint’ Your Way Past ESG Backlash

by Marga Hoek
May 21, 2025

As ESG programs face growing critique, organizations need practical approaches that deliver measurable results. Business sustainability expert Marga Hoek introduces...

eu flags brussels

EU’s Regulatory Retreat? The Omnibus Package’s Impact on Sustainability Reporting

by Jon Solorzano, Kelly Rondinelli and Jacob Baltzegar
April 28, 2025

Extended timelines and reduced requirements offer relief as substantial reforms remain under consideration

data abstract green purple

66% of CISOs Worry Cyber Threats Are More Advanced Than Companies’ Defenses

by Staff and Wire Reports
April 25, 2025

US business sector falling behind in adoption of renewable energy

tree cover

Sustainability Belongs Everywhere

by Alekhya Reddy
April 2, 2025

Climate-related compliance extends beyond reporting mandates to address strategic business continuity challenges

Next Post
storm approaching risk

3 Keys for Tough Times: Relevance, Culture and Alignment

No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy | AI Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights