No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home FCPA

DOJ “Tweaks” FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy

Updates Address Ephemeral Messaging Systems and “De-Confliction” Requirement

by Michael Volkov
April 4, 2019
in FCPA, Featured
WhatsApp icon on smartphone

The Department of Justice has recently amended its policy on corporate enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Michael Volkov covers the DOJ’s clarification of the de-confliction parameters, as well as its stance on the use of ephemeral messaging systems like WhatsApp.

The Justice Department is wedded to its FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy (excuse me for the use of “wedded,” we recently celebrated our son’s wedding). Nonetheless, the DOJ has to adjust its policy in response to experience and feedback. That is a good thing – one that helps to ensure the policy is predictable and consistent in its application.

I am convinced that the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy is settling into an effective statement and balancing of competing interests. It has been a fairly straightforward process over the last 10 to 15 years for the Justice Department to arrive at its current state. 

My conclusion rests on several important indicators – the policy was “expanded” to cover merger and acquisition situations and has been cited as guidance for resolution of other corporate enforcement actions involving offenses outside the FCPA realm. So, for now, the FCPA policy guides criminal investigation and enforcement for money laundering, criminal sanctions and export control violations, corporate fraud and other criminal offenses within the DOJ’s purview.

In a recent announcement, on March 8, 2019, the DOJ announced several revisions to its policy. The revisions include a number of changes – the most significant of which is the relaxation of its prohibition on ephemeral messaging systems. The revised policy also clarifies the DOJ’s handling of de-confliction and reinforces its earlier pronouncement that the policy applies to companies involved in merger and acquisition transactions.

The FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy, which was adopted in November 2017, is outlined in the Justice Manual, the internal document that sets forth policies and procedures applicable to federal prosecutions. The policy provides companies with a presumption that the company will receive a declination if it voluntarily self-discloses, fully cooperates and provides timely and appropriate remediation (assuming that no aggravating factors are present, such as recidivist, senior official involvement).

As part of the required remediation, companies had to prohibit employees from “using software that generates but does not appropriately retain business records or communications.” In response to the burdensome nature of this requirement, DOJ prosecutors heard concerns about the application of this restriction. As a result, the DOJ revised its policy to require companies to “implement appropriate guidance and controls on the use of personal communications and ephemeral messaging platforms that undermine the company’s ability to appropriately retain business records or communications or otherwise comply with the company’s document retention policies or legal obligations.”

The DOJ’s original policy prohibition ignored the real-world application of ephemeral messaging systems, such as WhatsApp, which are routinely used by business employees. The prohibition was unrealistic given the business reality of current communications systems. The new policy provides greater flexibility to companies to account for their respective document retention policy and legal requirements.

The DOJ also modified its requirement that a company seeking to fully cooperate must ensure that it de-conflicts any plan to interview or investigate persons with the Justice Department so that it does not conflict with or harm the Justice Department’s investigative actions. The DOJ clarified that the “de-confliction” requirement had limited scope and was not intended to inject DOJ oversight, nor to direct a company’s internal investigation. 

The revised policy also incorporated prior announcements by the DOJ that companies involved in merger and acquisition due diligence or post-acquisition integration efforts can avail themselves of the policy in the event that they uncover misconduct. In other words, a company that discovers foreign bribery during pre-closing due diligence or a post-acquisition audit can earn a declination if it voluntarily discloses the conduct, fully cooperates and implements a robust anti-corruption compliance program in the acquired company. The DOJ emphasized that it wants to encourage companies with strong corporate cultures of compliance to move forward with an acquisition of a company that may have legacy FCPA compliance issues.

This article was republished with permission from Michael Volkov’s blog, Corruption, Crime & Compliance.


Tags: FCPA Enforcement ActionsMergers and Acquisitions
Previous Post

Despite Growing in Maturity, Work Remains for ERM

Next Post

How Enterprises Can Use Encryption to Protect Linux Servers and Support Compliance Efforts

Michael Volkov

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlaw.com. Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

Stericycle FCPA Enforcement Action

Stericycle FCPA Enforcement Action

by Corporate Compliance Insights
June 23, 2022

Tom Fox dives into the details of Stericycle’s multinational bribery scheme in Latin America that landed the company millions of...

glencore building

As Details of $1B Glencore FCPA Settlement Show, Cooperation Pays

by Thomas Fox
June 15, 2022

The blockbuster settlement and plea agreement by Glencore tells the story of a multinational culture of corruption. Attorney and podcaster...

KT company building in Seoul

Compliance and Ethics Lessons Learned from KT Corps’ $6.3 Million FCPA Settlement

by Michael Volkov
March 23, 2022

The SEC's FCPA settlement with South Korean telecom KT Corporation was relatively light, thanks in part to the latter's cooperation....

M&A concept

Are You a Prepared Acquirer?

by Mark Sirower and Jeff Weirens
March 15, 2022

Boards of directors and company leadership tend to go about acquisitions in one of two ways. Some are presented with...

Next Post
red combination lock on circuit board

How Enterprises Can Use Encryption to Protect Linux Servers and Support Compliance Efforts

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance Decision-Making DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring Ransomware RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT