No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home GRC Vendor News

Directors Weigh in on “Overboarding,” Non-GAAP Metrics

by Corporate Compliance Insights
October 11, 2016
in GRC Vendor News
Directors Weigh in on “Overboarding,” Non-GAAP Metrics

BDO Survey covers financial reporting and executive compensation among other issues

Chicago, IL – According to a new survey by BDO USA, LLP, one of the nation’s leading accounting and consulting organizations, three-quarters (74 percent) of public company board members are in favor of placing limits on the total number of boards on which a director may serve and they generally favor more stringent limitations than those supported by proxy advisory firms.  When asked if regulators should provide additional guidance on the use of non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) measures in financial statements, directors are fairly evenly split (51 percent for vs. 49 percent against); however, a majority (67 percent) believe auditor involvement would provide higher investor confidence in the reporting of non-GAAP measures.  Overall, better than three-quarters (70 percent) of directors feel the plethora of disclosures in current financial statements make it difficult to decide what information is important.

“The 2016 BDO Board Survey reveals frustration among boards with the growing number of disclosures in financial statements today, though they clearly see use for non-GAAP metrics – especially with regard to executive compensation calculations,” said Amy Rojik, Partner in the Corporate Governance Practice at BDO USA.  “Directors are also clearly in favor of setting limits on how many total boards on which a director can serve, but not on the amount of pay they can earn for their service.”

Overboarding

In recent years, directors have seen a major increase in the number of hours required to serve on a public company board.  Given this trend, in 2017, proxy advisory firms ISS and Glass Lewis have indicated they will oppose non-executive directors with more than five board seats. Interestingly, board members themselves are in favor of more severe limits.

When asked about the issue of “overboarding,” approximately three-quarters (74 percent) of directors believe corporate boards should proactively limit the number of boards on which a director can serve.  Of those in favor of setting limitations, more than three-quarters (79 percent) would set more severe limits than the proxy advisors.  Forty-four percent would set the limit at three boards, more than a quarter (28 percent) chose four and less than 10 percent said two (6 percent) or one (1 percent).  Only 19 percent of directors agreed with the proxy advisors’ suggested limit of five board seats.

Financial Reporting Disclosures

Seventy percent of board members believe that there are so many disclosures in financial statements today that it is difficult to decide what information is most important.  When asked to identify the most meaningful financial reporting disclosures for investors, approximately half (49 percent) cited critical audit matters that involve complex judgments on material issues.  Non-GAAP financial measures that provide supplemental information on a business’ performance (29 percent) and how the organization is addressing risk management (19 percnt) were the next most cited as meaningful disclosures.

More than two-thirds (71 percent) of public company board members believe disclosures regarding the audit committee’s oversight of the external auditor provide value to current and potential shareholders.  Alternatively, less than a quarter (24 percent) of directors believe disclosures regarding sustainability matters (climate change, corporate social responsibility, etc.) are important to investors’ understanding of a company’s business and enabling them make informed decisions.

Non-GAAP Metrics

Board members were split when asked whether they thought additional guidance from regulators on non-GAAP metrics would be helpful, given the increased use of these measures in financial statements.  About half (51 percent) were in favor of additional guidance, while a similar proportion (49 percent) saw no need for more regulatory guidance.  Of those in favor of additional guidance on non-GAAP measures, close to half (46 percent) identified EBITDA as the metric that causes them the most concern.  Restructuring costs (14 percent), stock-based compensation (13 percent) and acquisition integration costs (13 percent) were areas of concern cited by much smaller minorities of directors.

Two-thirds (67 percent) of the board members feel auditor involvement would provide higher investor confidence in the reporting of non-GAAP measures, compared to one-third (33 percent) who do not feel it will have an impact.

Despite the popular criticism that non-GAAP or pro forma figures – when used with compensation metrics – can help executives draw bigger pay packages, approximately three-quarters (74 percent) of directors are opposed to prohibiting the use of non-GAAP measures in executive compensation calculations.

Executive Compensation

Frequency of Say-on-Pay.  In 2011, the Dodd-Frank Act instituted mandatory “Say-on-Pay” shareholder votes on executive compensation which should be conducted every one, two or three years, as determined by the shareholders.  The frequency of these shareholder votes is to be revisited and voted on every six years.  In 2017, most public companies will be conducting a new shareholder vote to determine the frequency of Say-on-Pay votes moving forward.  This year’s survey reveals that directors see a disconnect between themselves and shareholders on this issue.

Based on their experience over the past six years, a majority (56 percent) of board members believe the votes should take place every three years, compared to approximately one-fifth (19 percent) preferring two years and one-quarter (25 percent) opting for every year.  However, when asked to predict how their shareholders will vote on the frequency of Say-on-Pay votes, half (51 percent) of the directors predicted every year.  The remainder were split between every two years (22 percent) and every three years (27 percent).

Communicating on Pay.  Forty-one percent of directors do not consider it appropriate to communicate with institutional shareholders regarding incentive pay packages.  In contrast, at least one-fifth (22 percent) of directors say their board or compensation committee does proactively communicate with institutional shareholders on the topic and slightly fewer (18 percent) indicate they are considering such communications.  Interestingly, of the relatively few actively communicating, two-thirds (66 percent) believe it has positively impacted their investor relations.  Only three percent believe it hasn’t.  The remainder (31 percent) weren’t sure.

CEO – Median Employee Pay Ratio.  Beginning with 2018 proxies, public companies will be required to disclose the ratio of median employee pay to CEO compensation.  This 2018 requirement will report on 2017 compensation.  When asked if their boards had begun to take steps to comply with this new requirement, directors were split.  Almost half (49 percent) are familiar with the new requirement but have taken no actions, while better than one-third (37 percent) are already preparing pay ratio calculations for internal planning purposes – though they will not disclose the ratio prior to the required disclosure date.  Relatively few (8 percent) say they are planning to disclose the pay ratio calculation prior to the mandatory disclosure date. Surprisingly, 6 percent of the directors say they are still unfamiliar with the requirement.

Director Pay Limits?  Recent shareholder lawsuits alleging excessive director pay have put a spotlight on how boards determine their own pay.  When asked about the topic, a majority (56 percent) of board members were opposed to director pay limits, compared to 44 percent in favor of limits.   Of those in favor of limits on director pay, a strong majority (81 percent) favor total compensation limits versus the remainder (19 percent) that prefer only equity limits.

Presidential Preference?

When asked which of the two major party presidential candidates would positively impact corporate governance, Donald Trump (25 percent) received twice the support of Hillary Clinton (12 percent), but the most popular opinion (54 percent) of the board members was that neither candidate will have a positive impact.

BDO Board Survey

These are just a few of the findings of the 2016 BDO Board Survey, conducted by the Corporate Governance Practice of BDO USA in September 2016.  The annual survey examines the opinions of 160 corporate directors of public company boards regarding financial reporting, executive compensation, risk management and other corporate governance issues.

BDO USA’s Corporate Governance Practice is a valued business advisor to corporate boards.  The firm works with a wide variety of clients, ranging from entrepreneurial businesses to multinational Fortune 500 corporations, on myriad of accounting, tax, risk management and forensic investigation issues.

About BDO USA

BDO is the brand name for BDO USA, LLP, a U.S. professional services firm providing assurance, tax, financial advisory and consulting services to a wide range of publicly traded and privately held companies. For more than 100 years, BDO has provided quality service through the active involvement of experienced and committed professionals.  The firm serves clients through more than 60 offices and more than 400 independent alliance firm locations nationwide. As an independent Member Firm of BDO International Limited, BDO serves multinational clients through a global network of more than 1,300 offices in over 150 countries.

BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms. BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms. For more information, please visit: www.bdo.com.


Previous Post

New Changes from the SEC

Next Post

Why Improve Risk Management?

Corporate Compliance Insights

Corporate Compliance Insights

Corporate Compliance Insights

Related Posts

parliament

Coming Soon to the UK: Sweeping Corporate Criminal Liability Reforms?

by Peters and Peters
March 28, 2023

UK legislators have proposed major amendments to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill currently passing through Parliament. If adopted,...

wind turbines

What Companies Around the Globe Need to Know About EU Sustainability Reporting

by John Peiserich
March 28, 2023

By the beginning of next year, large companies in the EU or that do a substantive amount of business in...

amsterdam

At a Gathering of Compliance Practitioners, No Shortage of Food for Thought

by Mary Shirley
March 28, 2023

Last week, about 300 ethics and compliance professionals descended upon Amsterdam’s Hotel Okura to participate in SCCE’s European Compliance &...

documents

Meeting Accounting Standards in an Uncertain Economy

by Tom Zauli
March 28, 2023

After a Covid-related grace period, new contract accounting standards — ASC 606 — are in effect for both public and...

Next Post
improving risk management for better governance and more

Why Improve Risk Management?

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT