Saturday, December 7, 2019
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home News

Court Ruling Enhances Employees’ Web-Posting Rights

by Corporate Compliance Insights
November 10, 2015
in News
Gil C / Shutterstock.com

Second Circuit says employee’s Facebook criticism of employer and colleague’s “like” are protected activity under NLRB, LeClair Ryan attorney Carmon Harvey writes in recent blog post

Philadelphia (11/9/15) — Companies may not “like” a court’s recent affirmation of a National Labor Relations Board ruling that appears to expand employees’ rights to vent on social media, but they need to understand how to make sure they do not run afoul of the NLRA (National Labor Relations Act), says Carmon Harvey, a shareholder in national law firm LeClairRyan’s Philadelphia office.

The case–Three D, LLC d/b/a Triple Play Sports Bar and Grille v. National Labor Relations Board, Case No. 14-3284–involved two employees at Watertown, Connecticut’s Triple Play Bar and Grille who were terminated after one complained in a Facebook post about the establishment’s income tax-withholding policies and the second “liked” the post. An NLRB law judge found, and the Second Circuit Court agreed, that the Facebook activity in this case was “concerted” because it involved multiple employees and related to workplace complaints, and thus qualified for protection under the NLRA. Harvey was not involved with the case.

“It didn’t matter that there was no union to be found on the premises. The NLRA protects concerted activity by all employees, even those unaffiliated with any union,” writes Harvey in a recent blog post at EPLI Risk, which focuses on employment practices liability insurance, Directors and Officers liability insurance, and related issues. “It also didn’t matter that customers could see the public employer-bashing, because the content wasn’t directed at customers, was not defamatory and did not tend to disparage the employer’s brand, products or services. This meant that their subsequent terminations were a big NLRA ‘no-no.’”

To top it off, the court also affirmed the NLRB’s ruling that the employer’s expansive Internet and social media policy went too far, unlawfully prohibiting activity protected under the NLRA.

Although the Second Circuit declined to make the Summary Order precedential, given the recent rulings, Harvey advises businesses whose employees have taken to the web to air grievances to avoid overreacting, “count to 10, take a deep breath” and contact their employment counsel for guidance.

“It very well may be the case that your employee crossed the line and you’ll get the ‘(Y)’ to give them the boot,” she writes. “But given the NLRB’s relentless pursuit of what it perceives as overreaching by employers, it’s better to be ‘safe’ than hit into a triple play.”

To read the full blog post, visit: http://eplirisk.com/like-it-or-not-its-protected-activity-under-the-nlra/

About LeClairRyan

As a trusted advisor, LeClairRyan provides business counsel and client representation in corporate law and litigation.  In this role, the firm applies its knowledge, insight and skill to help clients achieve their business objectives while managing and minimizing their legal risks, difficulties and expenses. With offices in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Washington, D.C., the firm has approximately 380 attorneys representing a wide variety of clients throughout the nation.  For more information about LeClairRyan, visit www.leclairryan.com.


Previous Post

Boards Turn Critical Eye Inward: Peer Dissatisfaction on Rise

Next Post

Thomson Reuters Personal Liability Report Shows Increased Pressure on Companies’ Compliance Officers

Corporate Compliance Insights

Related Posts

black and white image of businessman paying bribe

Former CEO of Brazilian Petrochemical Company Charged for FCPA Violation

November 20, 2019
laptop screen featuring Office 365 migration in progress

Moving Communications to the Cloud? Consider Compliance Before Migrating

November 5, 2019
man using risk management software on tablet

NAVEX Global Announces Upgrade to Lockpath Risk Management Platform

October 28, 2019
three unrecognizable leaders superimposed over cityscape

Smarsh Expands Executive Leadership Team

October 17, 2019
Next Post
Thomson Reuters Personal Liability Report Shows Increased Pressure on Companies’ Compliance Officers

Thomson Reuters Personal Liability Report Shows Increased Pressure on Companies’ Compliance Officers

Free Downloads

OFAC whitepaper cover
Compliance Job Interview Q&A
Reputation Risk Management Research

RSS SEC Litigation News

  • Iconix Brand Group, Inc., Neil R. Cole and Seth Horowitz December 5, 2019
    SEC Charges Iconix Brand Group and Former Top Executives with Accounting Fraud
  • Lester Burroughs December 5, 2019
    SEC Charges Connecticut Man with Defrauding Retail Investors
  • SBB Research Group LLC, et al. December 4, 2019
    SEC Charges Hedge Fund Adviser and Top Executives with Fraud

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks Big Data blockchain board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management corporate culture corporate governance culture of ethics cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making Dodd-Frank DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit internet of things (IoT) KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • Audit
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • HR Compliance
  • Leadership and Career
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights