Monday, January 25, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

Cognitive Robotics and the Annual AML Risk Assessment

by Ajay Katara
March 2, 2018
in Featured, Risk
profile of head full of gears

Powering the Process through Automation

For financial institutions, the cost of noncompliance with AML policies and procedures is ever increasing. Per industry reports, AML fines have gone up to nearly $4 billion since 2014, and they continue to rise. Among other solutions, the banking industry is beginning to adopt robotics process automation to improve compliance.

The cost of noncompliance is ever increasing, with more and more financial institutions being fined for failing to adhere to AML (anti-money laundering) policies and procedures. Per industry reports, the AML fines have gone up to nearly $4 billion since 2014, and, if looking at the AML fines imposed by global regulators in 2017, the fines are only increasing. The banking industry is trying to mitigate such fines by chalking out adequate budgets in their annual spends to bring in newer technologies and improved AML compliance processes.

The AML risk assessment program – which helps banks and regulators to derive insights on the AML compliances within the bank – is one such key process. The annual report submitted to the regulator is based on the broad dimensions that have been prescribed by the AML examination manual, and the risk assessment process helps a bank to gain insights into its business practices and also understand any associated compliance risks.

What follows are the broad dimensions on which the assessment is performed:

  • The bank’s products and services
  • Its customer base
  • The geographic areas wherein the bank operates

Figure 1 – AML risk assessment coverage

Typically, the AML assessment exercise is done manually. There are close to 40 reports to be pulled out of a bank’s systems and compiled into reports across products and services, customers and geography risk factors. These reports are later analyzed by the compliance office, which gathers the findings, provides the necessary qualitative commentary and prepares the final report. The final report is further reviewed by the bank’s chief compliance officer and presented to the bank’s board of directors. After obtaining necessary approvals, the report is finally submitted to the regulatory authority. The regulators then carry out any necessary due diligence in consultation with the bank’s compliance office and provide their findings. If the findings are found satisfactory, no fines are levied.

Typical challenges faced by banks during the risk assessment process include:

  • Intensive manual effort – The AML risk assessment process is very high on manual efforts. Typically, one manual cycle of producing the annual reports takes three months, and around 70 percent of the effort is dedicated to extracting data and creating the
  • On-demand assessment – Though the AML risk assessment report is submitted annually, the compliance department may like to carry out periodic assessments on demand, which in a manual setup is
  • Lack of controls – Since most of the process is manual in nature, it is difficult to place adequate controls on the
  • Significant remediation efforts – Since the process of extracting and creating the reports is manual in nature, the process is error prone and, thus, very high on remediation efforts, adding to delays in compilation and final reporting.
  • Detecting patterns and trends – Since the process is carried out annually, it’s possible to identify hidden patterns or trends by studying past submissions. Because this exercise is very time-consuming, however, usually only limited references are made to prior reports and submissions, and important patterns or trends are often missed.

Considering the problem and the challenges faced, most banks are typically looking for solutions that can definitely shorten turnaround time, providing the bank a low-cost option that seamlessly integrates and interacts with the existing infrastructure, runs the process on demand and does not interfere with the legacy investments. In such a scenario, an RPA-based solution combined with cognitive capabilities can help banks meet their expectations and achieve the desired state. RPA, or robotics process automation, is a utility that mimics human behavior and carries out operations that are standard, low on exceptions and manual in nature.

It can also carry out business rule-based automations and judgment-based automations when combined with artificial intelligence solutions like machine learning, natural language processing, etc. This type of an automation is referred to as cognitive automation. Due to the above qualities, an RPA-based solution is emerging as a potent solution to many risk and compliance challenges.

If one were to envisage a solution for the above problem, it would typically involve combining RPA with cognitive capabilities. The RPA portion of the solution will definitely aid in reducing manual efforts by gathering the data from various sources, aggregating the data, carrying out data quality checks, preparing the reports and running the business rules. The cognitive solution then compares the current report with past reports and, through machine learning techniques, provides analytical insights on trends and patterns. This output is then mailed with the audit log by the RPA BoT (Robot) to the compliance office, where they can review the final reports and the insights provided. The compliance office accordingly provides suitable qualitative commentary and finally submits the report with findings to the chief compliance officer for his review.

Figure 2 – Illustration of a cognitive RPA solution in action

Once established, a cognitive RPA solution can providing the following benefits:

  • On-demand analysis – The compliance office can run the process on demand or regular time intervals to have a constant check on the data
  • Reduced manual effort – The available efforts of the compliance office can be now diverted for conducting value-added activities, such as detailed reviews
  • Increased control – A log is maintained of all the RPA processes that are run. Any exceptions encountered are also captured in the log.
  • Minimized need for remediation – Since the process is automated, it is error
  • Greater insight into patterns and trends – The cognitive component of the solution can provide detailed analytical insights not previously possible.

RPA’s applicability in early days was seen more from a tactical viewpoint, but – given its capability to gel in the existing infrastructure without impacting the legacy system, its lower cost of implementation and its capability to integrate with other digital technologies – it is graduating to strategic space where it can drive end-to-end, transformational business process automation. RPA adoption is still in the early stages, and many banks are still exploring use cases and problem statements, but banks are learning fast, and with every new problem statement, they are trying to raise the bar for RPA to achieve cost efficiencies and optimizations in their business processes.


Tags: anti-money laundering/AMLautomation
Previous Post

RANE Introduces Enhanced Risk News and Market Monitoring Service

Next Post

The Real Return on Risk and Compliance Technologies

Ajay Katara

Ajay Katara is a Domain Consultant with the Banking Industry Advisory Group at Tata Consultancy Services (TCS). He currently heads the Solution and Strategy for Enterprise Risk and Compliance Regulations. Ajay has extensive experience of more than 15 years in the Consulting & Solution design space cutting across CCAR Consulting, AML, Basel II implementation and credit risk, and he has worked with several financial enterprises across geographies. He has significantly contributed to the conceptualization of strategic offerings in the risk management space and has been instrumental in successfully driving various consulting engagements. He has also authored many editorials, details of which can be found on his LinkedIn profile.  

Related Posts

illustration of mafia man in silhouette with red tie

The Mafia’s Jackpot: How Criminal Organizations are Profiting from COVID-19

January 22, 2021
illustration of videoconference, screen and speech bubbles

New Risks as COVID-19 Forces Rapid Technology Adoption

January 21, 2021
silhouette of businesspeople in meeting with blue cyber background

Cyber Risk Quantification and Prioritization is the Future of GRC

January 20, 2021
miniature airplane on global currency

FinCEN’s Proposed Changes to the Recordkeeping and Travel Rule Thresholds

January 20, 2021
Next Post
concept of high-tech systems

The Real Return on Risk and Compliance Technologies

Access realtime data
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights