Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

California Mandates Increased Diversity on Corporate Boards

Specifics on and Deadlines for the State’s Diversity Requirements

by Michael Volkov
December 21, 2020
in Featured, Governance
transition from grayscale to diversity

California’s recently signed Assembly Bill 979 is requiring organizations to diversify their boards of directors. As Michael Volkov writes, the change is not only long overdue, but also in organizations’ best interests.

The United States continues to lag in corporate board diversity; many corporate boards are dominated by white males. Progress on this issue has been slow.

The number of women on Russell 3000 boards rose from 15 to 19 percent, with most of the increase occurred on boards of mid- and large-cap companies. In 2019, 45 percent of new board members were female, and only 15 percent were non-Caucasians.

Board diversity is imperative – social and professional diversity are both important. Gender, race and ethnicity and age diversity improves board performance and overall governance.

California has entered this public policy area by enacting AB 979, which requires California-based public companies to increase diversity through a phased-in requirement by 2023. Approximately 35 percent of California company boards consist of all white members.

The California law applies to all domestic or foreign companies with its principal office in California.  Under the law, companies are required to increase the diversity of their boards to include “underrepresented” communities, including Blacks, African Americans, Hispanics, Latinos, Asians, Native Americans and members of the LGBTQ community.

Two years ago, California mandated that at least one board member has to be a female.

California companies have to meet specific requirements: By the end of 2021, all boards must have one underrepresented member; by the end of 2022, boards with nine or more members must have three underrepresented members, while boards with five to eight members must have two underrepresented members. Companies that do not meet these requirements will be subject to penalties of $100,000 to $300,000.

The California business community will need to plan to meet the phased-in deadlines. Not only is board diversity imperative for a company’s culture and public engagement, research has shown that it improves board performance. A diverse board also improves financial performance. The same can be said for senior executive management.

California corporations have to plan ahead. Nomination committees will have to determine what changes, if any, will be needed. The new requirements will require careful consideration of the need to replace certain board members or change the board size.

The law could be used as a way to implement other governance reforms to assess the overall board composition and operation. Boards should consider mandatory retirement at certain ages and including designated seats for certain expertise, such as potential board members with compliance expertise.

Boards need to redefine expertise requirements and seek increased diversity in this area as well. If needed, the company may consider increasing board size, keeping in mind that if membership increases to nine or more, three members must be from an underrepresented group.

Companies have to begin active searches to recruit and entice underrepresented individuals to join the company’s board. Hopefully, boards will be able to identify underrepresented candidates – particularly those in the same industry.

While noncomplying companies may be subject to penalties, the larger risk to companies is the public perception and reputational damage from failing to embrace a commitment to diversity. The harm to a company’s reputation could be significant.


Tags: board compositionboard of directorsdiversityreputation risk
Previous Post

Intelligize: 2021 Playbook on ESG Shareholder Proposals

Next Post

Proposed FASB Changes and The Road to Lease Accounting Compliance

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlaw.com. Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

digital cybersecurity and network protection

Vetting Vendors’ Cybersecurity

January 26, 2021
illustration of man on ladder with binoculars, 2021 outlook concept

Financial Services Compliance in 2021

January 25, 2021
illustration of mafia man in silhouette with red tie

The Mafia’s Jackpot: How Criminal Organizations are Profiting from COVID-19

January 22, 2021
illustration of videoconference, screen and speech bubbles

New Risks as COVID-19 Forces Rapid Technology Adoption

January 21, 2021
Next Post
view of skyscrapers from the ground looking up

Proposed FASB Changes and The Road to Lease Accounting Compliance

Access realtime data
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights