Sunday, April 18, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • On-Demand Webinars
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • On-Demand Webinars
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

California Mandates Increased Diversity on Corporate Boards

Specifics on and Deadlines for the State’s Diversity Requirements

by Michael Volkov
December 21, 2020
in Featured, Governance
transition from grayscale to diversity

California’s recently signed Assembly Bill 979 is requiring organizations to diversify their boards of directors. As Michael Volkov writes, the change is not only long overdue, but also in organizations’ best interests.

The United States continues to lag in corporate board diversity; many corporate boards are dominated by white males. Progress on this issue has been slow.

The number of women on Russell 3000 boards rose from 15 to 19 percent, with most of the increase occurred on boards of mid- and large-cap companies. In 2019, 45 percent of new board members were female, and only 15 percent were non-Caucasians.

Board diversity is imperative – social and professional diversity are both important. Gender, race and ethnicity and age diversity improves board performance and overall governance.

California has entered this public policy area by enacting AB 979, which requires California-based public companies to increase diversity through a phased-in requirement by 2023. Approximately 35 percent of California company boards consist of all white members.

The California law applies to all domestic or foreign companies with its principal office in California.  Under the law, companies are required to increase the diversity of their boards to include “underrepresented” communities, including Blacks, African Americans, Hispanics, Latinos, Asians, Native Americans and members of the LGBTQ community.

Two years ago, California mandated that at least one board member has to be a female.

California companies have to meet specific requirements: By the end of 2021, all boards must have one underrepresented member; by the end of 2022, boards with nine or more members must have three underrepresented members, while boards with five to eight members must have two underrepresented members. Companies that do not meet these requirements will be subject to penalties of $100,000 to $300,000.

The California business community will need to plan to meet the phased-in deadlines. Not only is board diversity imperative for a company’s culture and public engagement, research has shown that it improves board performance. A diverse board also improves financial performance. The same can be said for senior executive management.

California corporations have to plan ahead. Nomination committees will have to determine what changes, if any, will be needed. The new requirements will require careful consideration of the need to replace certain board members or change the board size.

The law could be used as a way to implement other governance reforms to assess the overall board composition and operation. Boards should consider mandatory retirement at certain ages and including designated seats for certain expertise, such as potential board members with compliance expertise.

Boards need to redefine expertise requirements and seek increased diversity in this area as well. If needed, the company may consider increasing board size, keeping in mind that if membership increases to nine or more, three members must be from an underrepresented group.

Companies have to begin active searches to recruit and entice underrepresented individuals to join the company’s board. Hopefully, boards will be able to identify underrepresented candidates – particularly those in the same industry.

While noncomplying companies may be subject to penalties, the larger risk to companies is the public perception and reputational damage from failing to embrace a commitment to diversity. The harm to a company’s reputation could be significant.


Tags: board compositionboard of directorsdiversityreputation risk
Previous Post

Intelligize: 2021 Playbook on ESG Shareholder Proposals

Next Post

Proposed FASB Changes and The Road to Lease Accounting Compliance

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlaw.com. Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

Business professionals stand in silhouette in a conference room.

How Far Will You Go?

April 16, 2021
allustration of a man looking at a moon through a telescope

Periodic Reporting for Public Companies in 2021: What Lies Ahead

April 14, 2021
A view of the Veriff mobile app

Estonian Identity Verification Service Veriff Raises $69M in Series B Led by IVP and Accel

April 13, 2021
President Joe Biden.

The Biden Administration Is Ramping Up Numerous Cross-Border Enforcements. Compliance Teams Should Take Note.

April 13, 2021
Next Post
view of skyscrapers from the ground looking up

Proposed FASB Changes and The Road to Lease Accounting Compliance

2Behavox and CCI webinar: Power of Ai in F
OneTrust offers download to demonstrate privacy management leadership
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management culture of ethics cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence ESG fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2021 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • On-Demand Webinars
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2021 Corporate Compliance Insights