Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

Proposed FASB Changes and The Road to Lease Accounting Compliance

How the Changes Will Impact Financial Reporting

by Joe Fitzgerald
December 22, 2020
in Featured, Financial Services
view of skyscrapers from the ground looking up

How has COVID-19 impacted the road to compliance and the accounting industry? Visual Lease’s Joe Fitzgerald discusses why FASB has proposed new changes to its lease guidelines and what it means for companies on their compliance journey.

COVID-19 has shifted the landscape in nearly every industry, and the lease accounting and compliance sectors have been no exception. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recognized the struggles companies have been facing during the pandemic and has proactively proposed changes to its processes and requirements for lessees and lessors in light of these circumstances. The accommodations made include FASB shifting the deadline to achieve compliance, granting private companies more time to prepare to meet its major lease accounting standards, including ASC 842, and several recently proposed modifications to the lease accounting guidelines.

The accommodations FASB made this year demonstrate that the future of many businesses is not as certain as it once was, and the industry is taking note and is willing to adjust. New lease accounting changes might still arise as the economic climate continues to shift, but compliance remains critical due to the time-consuming nature of the work required to gather, analyze and report data to achieve it. Although the road to compliance is a major task, the financial opportunities businesses can unlock in return are immense.

Proposed Lease Accounting Changes and What They Mean

Within the recently proposed changes, released in late October, the first modification applies to lessors and amends lease classification requirements for leases in which the payments are predominantly variable, by requiring lessors to classify and account for those leases as operating leases. With this proposed change, the risk of lessors accruing losses at the creation of leases for sales-type agreements that are expected to be profitable would be mitigated, and the resulting financial reporting would better represent the economics underlying the lease.

The second modification would provide lessees the option to remeasure lease liabilities for changes in a reference index or a rate affecting future lease payments at the date that those changes take effect. This modification would be available as an entity-wide accounting policy election, and – while not overly impactful – it would simplify the process for companies who dual-report for FASB and IASB.

A proposed change that has not yet been seen in the industry exists in the third adjustment, Modifications Reducing the Scope of a Lease Contract. This proposed FASB guideline change defines a lease modification as a change in the scope of a lease, or the consideration for a lease that was not part of the original terms and conditions of the contract. Considerations under this term would include adding or terminating the right to use one or more underlying assets or extending or reducing the contractual lease term.

The modification would ease accounting processes for terminations of one asset within a contract, including a master lease agreement. Due to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak, this issue has the potential to increase in frequency for companies, especially if lessees continue to consider partial terminations, impairments and abandonments. If passed, the proposed change would alter the requirements if there is an early termination of some leases scoped in a contract that does not financially impact the remaining leases in that contract for both lessees and lessors. In those situations, parties would be exempt from applying modification accounting to the leases that are left, so there is ultimately no change to the accounting for them. This can extend beyond master lease agreements and could apply to any lease arrangement with multiple components, even if they weren’t originally identified.

An example of this is a tenant who enters into an agreement to lease several floors in an office building, where initially, it may not have been important for them to identify each floor as a separate lease item. If they decide to modify the agreement to reduce the number of floors being leased from the lessor, the changes proposed by the exposure draft (ED) may be applicable regardless of whether the entity originally identified each floor as a separate component in the original lease.

The Road to Compliance Remains; Companies Need to Forge Ahead

Next year will be an important year for the industry, because while it may seem like an uncertain time, the accounting industry does not anticipate that the ASC 842 compliance deadline will shift again. Lease reporting at the end of 2020 may bring some additional proposed changes from FASB next year, but it will not affect the overall goals of companies to move forward on their journey to achieve compliance.

To ensure success, cross-functional coordination is key for private companies and government entities to achieve compliance with FASB lease accounting guidelines ahead of the deadline, but due to the time-consuming nature of this process, this is no easy feat. Many organizations fail to recognize how heavy of a lift it will actually be. Gathering, reviewing and reporting all lease data can be an unwieldy process — especially if manual systems, like Excel, are being used instead of a centralized lease data repository.

A centralized system is ideal for companies to efficiently manage leases, because these solutions assemble, track and analyze a company’s lease portfolio all in one place. These systems can also unlock latent financial opportunities in the lease portfolio, enabling businesses to save time and money down the road by recognizing potential overpayments, missed reimbursements or mistakes in tax reporting. Given the uncertain financial situations that some companies may face as a result of the pandemic, finding these often-overlooked financial details and opportunities for savings has never been more important.

With all of the changes that have shifted the landscape this year, the accounting industry has proven that it is flexible and able to adapt its compliance standards to accommodate companies that are dealing with the challenges brought on by the pandemic. With the newly proposed changes, companies impacted by COVID-19 will have new options that will impact their financial reporting to accommodate assets they may have reassessed during 2020. As FASB continues to consider the current climate, companies should get themselves into a position where they can meet the deadline now before it’s too late and need to scramble to get on track.


Tags: Coronavirus/COVID-19FASB
Previous Post

California Mandates Increased Diversity on Corporate Boards

Next Post

Caremark: Even the Highest Standard Can Be Met

Joe Fitzgerald

Joe Fitzgerald is Senior Vice President of Lease Management Strategy at Visual Lease, the leader in lease accounting and management software. After receiving his BBA in Accounting from Pace University, Fitzgerald began his career at one of the big four accounting firms, Ernst and Young (EY), becoming a Certified Public Accountant serving both public and privately held companies. After nearly a decade at EY, he went on to several senior finance roles at both venture capital and private equity backed companies before returning to EY for another eight years, where he was the firm’s Lease Technology & Managed Services GTM Leader. During his time in industry, Fitzgerald focused on finance and operations as the CFO for organizations in the healthcare, business services, real estate and leasing sectors. Upon his return to EY, he served hundreds of the firm’s clients as the Lease Technology & Managed Services GTM Leader. In this position, he routinely consulted with enterprise clients to help them navigate the challenges related to operations, technology and data management necessary to comply with the latest lease accounting standards. Most recently, Fitzgerald was involved in the development of the firm’s Managed Service offering for lease accounting and contract management, eventually leading the GTM Managed Service offering across the Americas.

Related Posts

digital cybersecurity and network protection

Vetting Vendors’ Cybersecurity

January 26, 2021
illustration of man on ladder with binoculars, 2021 outlook concept

Financial Services Compliance in 2021

January 25, 2021
illustration of mafia man in silhouette with red tie

The Mafia’s Jackpot: How Criminal Organizations are Profiting from COVID-19

January 22, 2021
illustration of videoconference, screen and speech bubbles

New Risks as COVID-19 Forces Rapid Technology Adoption

January 21, 2021
Next Post
quality level dial set to "high"

Caremark: Even the Highest Standard Can Be Met

Access realtime data
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights