Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Governance

Avenues for Reporting Employee Concerns

by Michael Volkov
December 29, 2014
in Governance
Avenues for Reporting Employee Concerns

This article was republished with permission from Michael Volkov’s blog, Corruption, Crime & Compliance.

We all like to make things more complex or difficult than they need to be.  Consider that a life lesson that we can share with our children, assuming they are even listening to us these days.

Compliance is a field that is easy to make overly complex. The trick is to be effective and to keep it simple.

I hear a frequent debate on whether a company should have one or two avenues for reporting employee concerns or hotlines, or maintain multiple avenues. The debate reminds me of a dog chasing its own tail. There never will be a satisfactory answer.

One the one hand, those who argue against multiple avenues for reporting employee concerns cite the diminution of a reporting avenue’s “brand.”

Opponents of this view usually point to the fact that the more avenues there are, the more likely an employee is going to use one of them, and that is all that matters – getting the complaint in the system.

The argument seems to boil down to whether or not a “brand” is more important than multiple possibilities. I find the argument distracting.

A Chief Compliance Officer has to look at the company’s culture and decide, in consultation with other stakeholders, what approach is likely to be most productive. Everyone agrees that the goal is to encourage employees to report concerns. (Of course, not every concern.)

The trick is to examine each possible avenue and make some decisions as to which ones might work well. No surveys, studies or other fancy-dancy costly reports are needed on this issue. Common sense sometimes is the most effective tool that a CCO can use.

An open-door policy is certainly an important avenue – whether it is to a direct supervisor, a skip supervisor, a senior manager or the Board itself. Such direct reporting should always be encouraged as one important avenue.

A second avenue is an ethics and compliance organization – an internal committee responsible for the oversight and management of the ethics and compliance function should be open to hearing employee concerns.

Employees logically look to the Human Resources office to report their concerns, even when the concern does not relate to an ethics and compliance issue. HR staff should be familiar with receiving such concerns and responding to the employee.

For some employees, anonymity and language capability is an important consideration in deciding where to raise a concern. Anonymity can be important for an employee who wants to report a concern and fears retaliation. Language capability is important for obvious reasons.

Many employees also cite the importance of reporting a concern to a third-party hotline service (e.g. NAVEX Global). Some employees believe (rightly or wrongly does not matter) that a third-party hotline is better than an internally maintained hotline system.

Companies also need to examine some of the new technologies for encouraging reporting such as online chat functions (which should protect the employee’s identity if needed). Web-reporting systems are much more common in the workplace, but can differ on whether the system uses intranet or public Internet access.

Whatever avenues are available, companies have to pick and choose those systems that will be embraced by the workforce and ensure that the avenues integrate into an effective triage/screening process and quick follow-up for investigation. Once the complement of avenues is picked, then companies have to design a campaign to promote the availability of such avenues for employees to use.

After a set of reporting avenues are in place, the system should be measured and monitored to see what avenues are working and what avenues are not. Again, real life results will guide the eventual design of the employee concern system using common sense as a guidepost.


Previous Post

Asia Pacific Anti-Corruption Rankings for 2014

Next Post

What FCPA Enforcement was Thinking in 2014

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlaw.com. Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

illustration of executive standing center stage with team in silhouette behind him

COVID-19: Navigating the “CEO Moment”

January 13, 2021
clipboard with silver bow and new year's resolutions list on blue background

New Year’s Resolutions for the Board in 2021

January 11, 2021
PwC: Board Effectiveness – A Survey of the C-Suite

PwC: Board Effectiveness – A Survey of the C-Suite

December 28, 2020
quality level dial set to "high"

Caremark: Even the Highest Standard Can Be Met

December 23, 2020
Next Post
What FCPA Enforcement was Thinking in 2014

What FCPA Enforcement was Thinking in 2014

Access realtime data
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights