No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Another Confusing Mold Insurance Decision

by Peter McGrath
February 19, 2016
in Compliance
recent ruling complicates already murky law around mold insurance coverage

Are losses caused by the presence of, or exposure to, mold or fungus in a building covered by liability insurance?  That question has never been easy to answer, and at the end of 2015, the Texas Court of Appeals added further complication to the already confusing structure of mold insurance law in America.

In a case titled In re: Liquidation of Legion Indemnity Company, the Director of Insurance in the State of Illinois was acting as liquidator for Legion Indemnity Company.  The liquidator asked the court to disallow a claim by 23 governmental employees who had obtained a judgment against a construction company in a negligence action related to bodily injury the employees suffered from exposure to toxic mold during the course of their construction employment.  Claimants sought to collect their judgment from the insurance company under a comprehensive general liability policy issued by Legion.  Legion had been placed in liquidation prior to the claims for judgment being entered, so claimants filed a claim against the liquidator.

In the policy at issue, the insurance did not cover losses arising from either “contamination” of the environment by a pollutant or on account of a single, continuous or intermittent or repeated exposure to any “health hazard.”  The policy defined the term “contaminant” to mean any unclean, unsafe, damaging, injurious or unhealthful condition arising out of the presence of any pollutant, whether permanent or transient, in any environment.  The policy further defined “health hazard” to mean any chemical, alkaline, radioactive material or other irritants or any pollutant or other substance, product or waste product, where the fumes or other discharges or effects therefrom, whether liquid, gas or solid or gaseous are determined to be toxic or harmful to the health of any person, plant or animal.

The liquidator recommended that the claim be denied based on the exclusionary language in the policy and the trial court agreed.  The Texas Court of Appeals, however, held that the terms “mold,” “fungi” or any similar wording are listed neither in the exclusion nor in the definition of the relevant terms.  The liquidator contended that the insurance company issued a broad policy to exclude mold from coverage and it did not have to enumerate the specific terms mold or fungi in the exclusion.  The Court held that the alleged intent to exclude mold-related claims was not clearly stated in the exclusion.

The Court distinguished two earlier Texas decisions, Lexington Insurance Company v. Unity/Waterford-Fair Oaks, Ltd. and American Equity Insurance Company v. Castle Maine Farms, Inc.  In Lexington Insurance, the exclusion provided that the policy did cover loss or damage resulting from, contributed to or made worse by contaminants or pollutants.  The policy definition of contaminants and pollutants included “bacteria, fungi, virus or other hazardous substances.”  Since mold is fungi the Lexington Court held that the loss caused by mold to several floors of an apartment complex was excluded from coverage.  In the American Equity Insurance case, the policy provided there was no coverage for loss which would not have occurred but for the release or escape of pollutants.  The policy defined pollutants as any “solid, liquid, gases or thermal irritants or contaminants including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acids, alkalizes, chemical and waste.”  The Court concluded the exclusion applied because the discharge from the salt water disposal pipe line was liquid waste.  The Court also noted that salt water was a contaminant when it was introduced accidentally onto property that was not meant to receive it.  The Court also examined another Texas decision, Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company.  The Hirschhorn Court determined that bat guano was a pollutant under a pollution exclusion.  The Court stated that bat guano was “waste” within the meaning of the pollution exclusion because a reasonable person would understand it to be waste.

These decisions are difficult to reconcile.  One clear rule seems to provide that if a pollution exclusion specially mentions mold, fungi or bacteria, mold damages will be excluded from coverage.  If the exclusion does not specifically and expressly identify mold, fungi or bacteria as excluded, the coverage question is murkier.  Mold and bacteria are present in practically every building in America.  The broad exclusions that explicitly list fungi and bacteria apply to any species or amount of those contaminants, in theory.  Because exclusions are silent on type or amount, any detectable fungi or bacteria could technically trigger the full exclusion.  Courts may be wary of imposing such an exclusion for such a common condition.  In other words, the bottom line is this: if there is an exclusion to your CGL policy that specifically mentions mold or bacteria, you are out of luck with respect to coverage for the costs of repairing mold damage or claims by individuals that mold has adversely affected their health.  If your policy does contain a pollution exclusion, though, that exclusion in itself may not be cause for despair.  You may have coverage for mold claims — it will require a careful analysis of the policy terms and the development of coverage law in your jurisdiction.


Previous Post

Are Your Millennials Ready to Step Up?

Next Post

STOPit Introduces Risk Mitigation Tool to Prevent & Mitigate Costly Workplace Misconduct

Peter McGrath

Peter McGrath

September 17 - Peter McGrath headshotA frequent lecturer and author on diverse environmental issues, Peter McGrath, a member at Moore & Van Allen, brings to his wide-ranging clients extensive counseling and litigation experience with environmental issues arising in business and real estate transactions.

Related Posts

Fox_DOJ Speeches_f

Analysis of Recent DOJ Statements

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 23, 2023

DOJ leaders provide insight into agency's plans. Analysis of Recent Statements DOJ Shaping the Future of Corporate Criminal Enforcement What’s...

Fox_2023 ECCP Update_f

2023 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 23, 2023

Keeping up with 2023 changes to DOJ guidelines. Additions, Deletions & Changes From 2020 2023 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs...

encompass update

Encompass Launches pKYC Maturity Model

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 22, 2023

KYC automation platform Encompass has unveiled a new perpetual Know Your Customer (pKYC) maturity model designed to help banks improve...

consilio onna partnership

Consilio, Onna Seek to Streamline eDiscovery for Cloud Apps

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 22, 2023

Legal technology provider Consilio has launched a new platform, Sightline Collect, powered by data management supplier Onna. The platform is...

Next Post
prevent fraud and workplace misconduct with the STOPit app

STOPit Introduces Risk Mitigation Tool to Prevent & Mitigate Costly Workplace Misconduct

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT