No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe
Jump to a Section
  • At the Office
    • Ethics
    • HR Compliance
    • Leadership & Career
    • Well-Being at Work
  • Compliance & Risk
    • Compliance
    • FCPA
    • Fraud
    • Risk
  • Finserv & Audit
    • Financial Services
    • Internal Audit
  • Governance
    • ESG
    • Getting Governance Right
  • Infosec
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
  • Opinion
    • Adam Balfour
    • Jim DeLoach
    • Mary Shirley
    • Yan Tougas
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

World Bank Debarment: Another consequence of bribery Asian companies need to know

by Wendy Wysong
March 26, 2015
in Compliance
World Bank

by Wendy Wysong, Michelle Mizutani, and Montse Ferrer

In addition to the widely publicized penalties, prison terms, and the associated costs of investigation and defense, another less well-known consequence of bribery is debarment from contracting on projects funded by the World Bank. Not only does the debarment affect a company’s ability to bid for the multi-million dollar projects in emerging markets funded by the World Bank, a company may also be cross-debarred from projects financed by other multilateral development banks (“MDBs”) and may appear as a “blacklisted” company on due diligence checklists even after the debarment period. For the last two years, companies and individuals in the Asian region were hit harder with sanctions than any other region.

When bidding on a World Bank project, a company should be aware that it becomes subject to the contractual anti-corruption measures between the bank and the borrowing country or company, including audit rights, lower evidentiary standards, and non-appealable decisions. The practical consequences of this additional penalty are explained in detail below.

The World Bank

The World Bank offers low-interest loans, grants, equity investments and guarantees to projects in developing countries, investing a total of USD65.6 billion in 2014. Five of the top ten recipient countries were in Asia. In order to prevent the diversion of funds from development projects, conduct that would ultimately hinder the World Bank’s goal of reducing poverty, the World Bank has put in place a comprehensive set of administrative sanctions for corrupt, fraudulent, collusive and coercive practices.

World Bank Debarment

The World Bank’s Procurement Guidelines, Consultant Guidelines and Anti-Corruption Guidelines (together, the “Guidelines“)[1] provide for the sanctioning of firms and individuals who are found to have engaged in, among other things, corrupt practices in the procurement of goods and services, the selection of consultants, the execution of resulting contracts, and the use of loan proceeds in connection with World Bank financed projects.

The default sanction applied by the World Bank is to impose a minimum period of debarment of three years (but with an early release if specific conditions have been met), during which the concerned firm or individual (the respondent) is ineligible to be awarded a World Bank-financed contract or to participate in World Bank-financed activities. Other possible sanctions include a letter of reprimand to the respondent, a conditional non-debarment (conditions include, for example, putting in place a compliance program), a fixed-term or indefinite debarment, or  restitution. If a borrower has failed to abide by its obligations under the Anti-Corruption Guidelines or has been sanctioned under another project, the World Bank may also suspend disbursement of a loan or require early repayment.

The term “corrupt practice” is defined broadly in the Guidelines as offering, giving, receiving or soliciting, directly or indirectly, anything of value to influence improperly the actions of another party. Another “sanctionable practice” is obstruction during an investigation or the exercise of the World Bank’s inspection and audit rights. The practice does not have to succeed or be completed.

Parties that May Be Sanctioned

The Procurement and Consultant Guidelines cover all actors involved in World Bank-financed procurement, including consultants and their agents, personnel, sub-contractors, sub-consultants, service providers or suppliers, regardless of whether they are a party to or even aware of the World Bank involvement.

The Anti-Corruption Guidelines cover any recipient of loan proceeds. The term “recipient of loan proceeds” is interpreted broadly, including all persons or entities which 1) receive loan proceeds for their own use (e.g. “end users”), 2) are responsible for the deposit or transfer of loan proceeds or 3) take or influence decisions regarding the use of loan proceeds. Sanctions can be applied even for conduct during the application process, irrespective of the bid result. . A review of the World Bank contract terms is advisable before bidding.  .  It is important to note that affiliates, successors, and assigns of sanctioned parties may also be sanctioned. Additionally, a debarred entity is ineligible to be a nominated sub-contractor, consultant, supplier or service provider of an otherwise eligible firm. Therefore, a company bidding for a World Bank project should ascertain that no debarred parties are included in its pre-qualification application or bid.

The Debarment Process

A two-tiered, quasi-judicial administrative process provides protection of the World Bank’s funds while enabling the respondent to respond to allegations of misconduct. However, the process is not fully transparent as court proceedings, lower evidentiary standards apply, national laws are inapplicable, and there are few published precedents. Thus, the process must be approached carefully and with guidance from practitioners with specialized experience.

The World Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT“) investigates and determines whether there is sufficient evidence of misconduct. If so, either a settlement is reached or the case is referred to a Suspension and Debarment Officer (“SDO“), the first tier of the review process. The SDO evaluates the evidence to determine whether the respondent engaged in the alleged sanctionable practice. Depending on the findings, an SDO may issue a Notice of Sanctions Proceedings with the allegations and recommended sanction, which results in an automatic temporary suspension of the respondent from bidding on World Bank financed contracts. The respondent may then contest the allegations or recommended sanction or submit, in which case  the recommended sanction is imposed.

If the respondent does contest the Notice, the case is passed on to the World Bank Sanctions Board, the second tier. The Board, consisting of three members of the World Bank and four external members, determines whether it is “more likely than not” that the sanctionable practice occurred, and in the event of an adverse finding, imposes a sanction.  The decision of the board is a final non-appealable decision.

Cross-Debarment and Cross-Referral

Pursuant to the 2010 Agreement for Mutual Enforcement of Debarment Decisions, a decision barring an entity from participating projects funded by a signatory MDB can also lead to debarment by the other MDBs, including the Asian Development World Bank. Although the MDBs have discretion, they generally recognize a World Bank debarment decision and 582 entities have been cross-debarred.

Moreover, the INT also makes referrals to the host government’s criminal authorities.

Recent Examples

Recent debarment decisions show the importance of this sanction in corruption decisions.

On February 22, 2012, Alstom Hydro France, Alstom Network Schweiz AG. and their affiliates were debarred for three years and paid USD9.5 million to the World Bank after acknowledging having engaged in sanctionable practices. Alstom made an improper payment of EUR110,000 to a former government official for consultancy services during the Zambia Power Rehabilitation Project, financed by the World Bank. On February 23, 2015, Alstom SA was removed from the World Bank’s sanctions list following the fulfilment of its conditions for release.

On April 17, 2013, the World Bank announced the debarment of SNC-Lavalin Inc., a subsidiary of the Canadian SNC-Lavalin Group, and over 100 affiliates for a period of 10 years. SNC-Lavalin had conspired to pay bribes and make misrepresentations in connection with two projects in Bangladesh.

On February 4, 2015, the Louis Berger Group, Inc., a US engineering and professional services group was debarred for one year, for its corrupt payments to Vietnamese officials under two World Bank financed projects

Conclusion

When a company considers a bid for a project with World Bank financing, it must ensure that its procedures can withstand the scrutiny of an INT audit. If an issue is uncovered, careful handling of the World Bank review process is critical as there is only one opportunity to get it right and getting it wrong can be devastating.

[1]      World Bank Sanctioning Guidelines; http://siteresources.worldWorld Bank.org/EXTOFFEVASUS/Resources/WorldWorld BankSanctioningGuidelines.pdf.


Previous Post

Deal or No Deal? Take this Test Before a Merger or Acquisition

Next Post

Think Holistically When Managing Risk

Wendy Wysong

Wendy Wysong

Wendy L. Wysong is a partner at Steptoe & Johnson. She served previously as a litigation partner with Clifford Chance, offering clients advice and representation on compliance and enforcement under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Arms Export Control Act, International Traffic in Arms Regulations, Export Administration Regulations, and OFAC Economic Sanctions. She was appointed by the State Department as the ITAR Special Compliance Official for Xe Services (formerly Blackwater) in 2010. Wendy combines her experience as a former federal prosecutor with the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia for 16 years with her regulatory background as the former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement at the Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce. She managed its enforcement program and was involved in the development and implementation of foreign policy through export controls across the administration, including the Departments of Justice, State, Treasury and Homeland Security, as well as the intelligence community. Wendy received her law degree in 1984 from the University of Virginia School of Law, where she was a member of the University of Virginia Law Review.

Related Posts

drug cartel soldier camo

Leveraging Human Rights Frameworks to Combat Emerging Cartel Risks

by Nate Lankford, Matteson Ellis and Nisha Sawhney-Murkett
May 19, 2025

As enforcement priorities shift to cartels and foreign terrorist organizations, established human rights processes can identify and mitigate emerging legal...

You are now registered!

Webinar: What Employee Experience Reveals About Your E&C Program

by Corporate Compliance Insights
May 16, 2025

11 a.m. - 12 p.m. ET Tuesday, June 3 Are your ethics and compliance metrics capturing what really matters? Programs...

LRN 2025 Program Maturity Global Study

2025 Global Study on Ethics & Compliance Program Maturity

by Corporate Compliance Insights
May 16, 2025

How does your ethics and compliance program measure up? Global study Ethics & Compliance Program Maturity What’s in this global...

check engine light

What Gets Measured Gets Managed, but What Actually Matters in Compliance?

by Keshonda Walker
May 16, 2025

Looking beyond standard measurements to identify the quiet signals that help compliance teams address issues before they become crises

Next Post
meditation for business

Think Holistically When Managing Risk

No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy | AI Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights