Sunday, March 7, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

How U.S. Cities Fight Money Laundering

by Jay Ryan
May 2, 2018
in Featured, Fraud
How U.S. Cities Fight Money Laundering

Fighting Money Laundering


Money Laundering Enters Real Estate

In this article, Jay Ryan, Executive Vice President at Accuity discusses measures U.S. cities are taking to combat money laundering and how the scheme has evolved and became a successful tool for identifying real estate money-laundering risks, focusing on Geographic Targeting Orders and assessing its performance since its introduction in 2016 by FinCEN. 

The purchase of expensive, high-end residential properties through opaque corporate structures in some U.S. cities, notably New York and Miami, had been an issue of growing comment and concern, not least because the trend was pushing property prices in the cities up sharply. The Miami Herald was among the local newspapers that spent years trying to uncover who was behind some of the biggest transactions, such as the $3 million cash deal in 2011 for an oceanfront condo in Bal Harbour. 

It was the release of the Panama Papers – a leak of thousands of confidential files of a Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca – that provided the clues the Herald needed. The papers showed that the company buying the condo, Isaias 21 Property, was ultimately run through an offshore company registered in the British Virgin Islands, owned by a Brazilian politician who was under indictment in Brazil for corruption. The Miami Herald’s analysis of the Panama Papers found eight instances in which a foreign national linked to bribery, corruption, embezzlement or tax evasion had bought a property in the city through an offshore company. 

Money laundering through real estate is a growing problem in many cities around the world. In the U.S. and U.K., the use of offshore shell companies in transactions, which allow the identity of the ultimate owner to be hidden, have become an area of concern. In New York, for example, around $8 billion is spent every year on homes worth $5 million or more, and over half of these transactions are made through shell companies. 

Real estate transactions have attracted the attention of regulators and governments around the world in their fight against money laundering and terrorism financing. Our recent report, “Money Laundering and Real Estate,” highlights how anti-money laundering (AML) legislation and requirements, until now mainly aimed at banks, have increasingly been applied to real estate professionals. Each country and region is moving at its own pace and in its own way, but the general trend is unmistakable. Before too long, real estate professionals will have to become very familiar indeed with AML legislation. 

The U.S. has taken a different path from many other jurisdictions and, so far, has not explicitly required professionals involved in real estate transactions (other than financial institutions) to meet AML requirements. Instead, the U.S. has favored Geographical Targeting Orders (GTOs), which were first introduced by the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crime Enforcement Network agency (FinCEN) in 2016. These require title insurance companies, their subsidiaries and agents to report on the beneficial owner of legal entities, including shell companies, that are used to buy certain luxury residential real estate (meaning those above a certain price threshold, which varies geographically) in specific locations. 

GTOs now cover seven areas: all boroughs of New York City; five counties in California (Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, San Mateo and Santa Clara); three counties in the Miami metropolitan area (Miami-Dade, Palm Beach and Broward); the county that includes San Antonio, Texas; and the City and County of Honolulu. Under the GTOs, all title insurance companies are required to identify and report the “natural persons” behind shell companies that make cash-only purchases of high-end real estate in these markets and report details of the transactions to FinCEN within 30 days of completion. 

The GTO scheme has been renewed and expanded three times since it was first introduced – in 2017 the scope of the scheme was expanded to include transactions completed through wire transfers as currency, checks, and money orders – and there is growing speculation that it could be made permanent and rolled out across the U.S. The approach seems to be working; according to FinCEN, about 30 percent of the transactions covered by the GTOs so far have been found to involve a beneficial owner or purchaser that is also the subject of a previous suspicious activity report. FinCEN has also published an advisory notice to help the real estate sector identify money-laundering risks. Regulators clearly believe that real estate professionals have an important role to play in tackling money laundering – it’s only a matter of time before AML screening becomes a fact of life for the sector.


Tags: beneficial ownershipFinCENmoney launderingPanama Papers
Previous Post

TRACE: Anonymous Shell Companies

Next Post

2018 Proxy Season: Emerging Issues Take Center Stage

Jay Ryan

Jay Ryan is an Executive Vice President for Accuity with responsibility for Accuity’s Americas & Global sales team. Jay has been with Accuity for more than eight years, leading the Accuity salesforce during the company’s double-digit growth period. Accuity offers a suite of innovative solutions for payments and compliance professionals, from comprehensive data and software that manage risk and compliance, to flexible tools that optimize payments pathways. With deep expertise and industry-leading data-enabled solutions from the Fircosoft, Bankers Almanac and NRS brands, our portfolio delivers protection for individual and organizational reputations. Part of RELX Group, a world-leading provider of information and analytics for professional and business customers across industries, Accuity has been delivering solutions to banks and businesses worldwide for 180 years.

Related Posts

green and red location markers on map

FinCEN’s Registry Will Be a Game-Changer. It Will Also Place an Added Burden on Corporations.

March 5, 2021
illustration of man under giant gavel

BitPay’s $507K OFAC Sanctions Violations Settlement

March 4, 2021
The facade of the SEC in Washington, D.C.

Prepare Now to Comply with SEC’s Updated MD&A and Related Financial Disclosure Requirements

March 3, 2021
Illustration representing a facial recognition technology scan of a face.

Facial Recognition Technology in the Workplace: Employers Use It, Workers Hate It, Regulation Is Coming for It

March 3, 2021
Next Post
2018 Proxy Season: Emerging Issues Take Center Stage

2018 Proxy Season: Emerging Issues Take Center Stage

OneTrust offers download to demonstrate privacy management leadership
Access realtime data
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence ESG fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights