Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights

Knowing When to Fold — Arguing the FCPA’s Definition of “Foreign Official”

by Michael Volkov
October 29, 2014
in Uncategorized
Knowing When to Fold — Arguing the FCPA’s Definition of “Foreign Official”

This article was republished with permission from Michael Volkov’s blog, Corruption, Crime & Compliance.

With lots of fanfare, Esquenazi and Rodriguez and the usual suspects filed a cert petition and briefs in support of the appeal from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the lower court’s interpretation of “instrumentality,” and the significant criminal sentences handed out to the two defendants.

The petition was denied quickly.  No one should have  been surprised, including all the usual suspects.  I do not want to rain on everyone’s parade, but the Justice Department has been winning — and consistently so — for years on this issue. To put it simply, they have the better argument.

Contrary to the views of my respected colleague, the FCPA Professor, the term “instrumentality” has a separate meaning and rightfully covers enterprises that are state-owned (or controlled). The DOJ persuaded three district court judges and one court of appeals, and has not lost yet.

The two defendants had to argue this issue.  Frankly, it is interesting to consider whether they may have won on some of the sentencing issues if they were not carrying this “instrumentality” issue on their backs.

Aside from the two defendants, however, who have to appeal and raise these issues, the gaggle of other supporters on the “instrumentality” issue are tilting at windmills.

The issue is very basic – the term “instrumentality” has to mean something, or Congress was legislating in an absurd manner (which may be possible, especially when I consider how we drafted some laws during my Congressional career). The term has to mean something and opponents have never answered that simple and basic question. Instead, they point to other legislative measures, the absence of an affirmative statement in the legislative history and unsupported claims of unfair interpretations.

The DOJ’s arguments on this issue have always been solid. The opponents use slippery tactics to obfuscate basic statutory interpretation maxims.

Wholly apart from the issue of statutory explanations, the cert petition presented no compelling reason for the Supreme Court to get involved in this debate. We have only one Circuit Court decision and three district court decisions, all with similar interpretations and rulings. There is no Circuit split on this issue and the absence of this factor undermined any reason for the Supreme Court to get involved.

Finally, while no one will admit the importance of politics as a factor, no one is willing to take on the cause of restricting an otherwise broad statute aimed at reducing the occurrence of foreign bribery. While some may say that DOJ and the SEC have stretched the FCPA beyond its intended purpose, there is no track record of victims of aggressive prosecutions or examples of injustice.

The FCPA is not as vague as critics like to claim. The message is very simple – do not bribe. Companies and executives know what it means and they know what they are prohibited from doing. Of course, there are difficult line-drawing issues, but that is a far cry from the list of injustices that undermined enforcement of other statutes, like the honest services doctrine that was being stretched beyond any reason to cover corporate fraud.

Instead of focusing so much on pipe dreams of overturning basic FCPA principles and the Chamber of Commerce’s dead-in-the-water FCPA reforms effort, businesses and practitioners need to focus on something that is achievable – compliance with the law. It is not as hard as everyone thinks, and the DOJ’s prosecution program is a lot more reasonable than critics contend.


Tags: tone at the top
Previous Post

LeClairRyan Launches ACAMONITOR to Help Businesses Comply with Affordable Care Act

Next Post

Mobilize Enterprise Content – Wherever it Resides

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan

Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at [email protected].

Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

futuristic technology projecting 2020 in white text

The Future of Data Privacy Regulation

December 11, 2019
new york city skyline at sunset

The Early Days: The Birth of the Independent Monitoring Concept

December 11, 2019
finger over green report button on white keyboard

DOJ Updates FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy Again

December 10, 2019
stack of newspapers on laptop

The Social Construction of a Scandal

December 9, 2019
Next Post
Mobilize Enterprise Content – Wherever it Resides

Mobilize Enterprise Content – Wherever it Resides

Free Downloads

OFAC whitepaper cover
Compliance Job Interview Q&A
Reputation Risk Management Research

RSS SEC Litigation News

  • Nanotech Engineering, Inc., Michael James Sweaney (also known as Michael Hatton), David Sweaney, and Jeffery Gange December 11, 2019
    SEC Obtains Asset Freeze to Halt Alleged Offering Fraud
  • Harpreet Grewal December 10, 2019
    SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Former Online Marketing Company Executive
  • Christopher Collins, et al. December 10, 2019
    Former Congressman and Two Others Settle Insider Trading Charges

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks Big Data blockchain board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management corporate culture corporate governance culture of ethics cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making Dodd-Frank DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit internet of things (IoT) KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • Audit
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • HR Compliance
  • Leadership and Career
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights