No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe
Jump to a Section
  • At the Office
    • Ethics
    • HR Compliance
    • Leadership & Career
    • Well-Being at Work
  • Compliance & Risk
    • Compliance
    • FCPA
    • Fraud
    • Risk
  • Finserv & Audit
    • Financial Services
    • Internal Audit
  • Governance
    • ESG
    • Getting Governance Right
  • Infosec
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
  • Opinion
    • Adam Balfour
    • Jim DeLoach
    • Mary Shirley
    • Yan Tougas
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home FCPA

Jimmy Carter’s Anti-Corruption Legacy

Carter signed FCPA into law & nominated 2 women to SEC

by Mark S. Nelson
January 13, 2025
in FCPA
jimmy carter

In the days and weeks following his death, most tributes to President Jimmy Carter highlighted his humanitarian work after leaving office. That’s understandable, given that he was honored with a Nobel Peace Prize for it, but those who focus entirely on his post-presidential legacy obscure his connection to important milestones in US securities and anti-corruption law. Mark Nelson of Wolters Kluwer digs into Carter’s record in these areas.

Jimmy Carter’s single term in office will be remembered for many things, including trying economic times, an attempt to recover the nation’s moral standing following the Watergate scandal and the prolonged Iranian hostage crisis. 

A lesser-known legacy of the 39th president, honored in a state funeral Jan. 9, less than two weeks after his death at age 100, is in securities law, where he signed anti-corruption and capital formation legislation and nominated the first two women commissioners to the SEC.

Presidential authority & the SEC

The modern president by law has few direct authorities over the SEC beyond nominating individuals to be commissioners and designating one individual to be chair. Still, the president can exert some influence over the SEC, an independent federal agency, in limited circumstances.

For example, the president can disapprove a commission order to close trading markets and they can end certain SEC emergency actions. The president can require the SEC to revise, waive or terminate disclosures under the conflict minerals provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The president also submits the SEC’s budget request to Congress, is subject to insider trading rules under the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act and occasionally receives reports on securities-related issues, including notices about companies’ activities regarding Iran, which relate to a long-standing US sanctions regime, and topics under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), a law that addressed corporate accounting scandals in the early 2000s.

Moreover, the president can take certain actions under the FCPA, the most significant securities law enacted during the Carter Administration. Under the FCPA’s accounting provisions, which require the maintenance of books and records and the creation of corporate internal controls, the president can allow agency heads, and individuals acting in cooperation with them, to take certain actions. The exercise of presidential authority under the FCPA (and under the conflict minerals rules noted above) must be done in the interest of US national security. The president also has a role in defining who, under the FCPA’s bribery provisions, is a “public international organization,” a component of “foreign official,” one of the FCPA’s most important definitions.

Otherwise, presidents typically remain somewhat detached from the SEC and instead focus on their signature economic powers: setting the nation’s fiscal policy and signing finance-related legislation into law. This latter power includes the ability to veto legislation, an action that only occasionally arises in the securities law context, as it did in the mid-1990s when Congress enacted into law the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act over President Bill Clinton’s veto.

The Carter Administration marked the beginning of the deregulatory era in American government and perhaps that, along with other considerations, influenced Carter’s approach to the SEC. According to a timeline compiled by the SEC Historical Society, Carter was distracted by other economic issues and opted to take an overall “hands-off” approach to the SEC, an agency that he considered to be nonpartisan. Contrast that approach to the present-day SEC whose commissioners, with some exceptions, often are drawn from a largely partisan pipeline of Congressional staffers.

Still, anti-corruption legislation, along with capital formation initiatives, remain the mainstays of the modern presidency and of Congress in the securities law space:

  • Gerald Ford signed into law the legislation that created a national market system, a goal that would be implemented under the Carter Administration with a boost from one ground-breaking SEC nomination made by Carter.
  • George W. Bush signed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act into law.
  • Bill Clinton signed into law the National Securities Markets Improvement Act, which addressed rules for broker-dealers and investment advisers while also splitting oversight of securities regulations between federal and state authorities, thus adding significantly to Securities Act Section 18, one of the most frequently revised federal securities laws.
  • Barack Obama signed into law the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act just two years after signing into law the massive Dodd-Frank Act, his administration’s signature response to the Great Recession of 2008.

Carter’s securities-related legislative agenda thus followed a trend in the making before he took office, and which later presidents have continued to pursue long after his time in the White House.

boston consulting group building
FCPA

Compliance Lessons From Boston Consulting Group’s FCPA Declination

by Mary Shirley
August 30, 2024

Self-disclosure, voluntary program improvements cited as factors in DOJ decision

Read moreDetails

Jimmy Carter, corruption fighter

Early in his presidency, Carter signed into law the FCPA. The bill ensured that business-related bribery could be punished via civil and criminal liability, thus rejecting his predecessor’s preferred disclosure-based approach.

“I share Congress[‘s] belief that bribery is ethically repugnant and competitively unnecessary,” said Carter in a presidential signing statement. “Corrupt practices between corporations and public officials overseas undermine the integrity and stability of governments and harm our relations with other countries. Recent revelations of widespread overseas bribery have eroded public confidence in our basic institutions.”

Carter, however, ended that statement on a cautionary note. According to Carter, the FCPA would never reach its full potential unless other countries took similar measures to fight corruption.

Today, the FCPA’s accounting provisions often see more enforcement activity than its bribery provisions and some critics have noted a dearth of FCPA cases at times. But even if there are lulls in the bringing of major FCPA cases, there are almost always cases in the enforcement pipeline at both the SEC and DOJ, and both Republican and Democratic administrations continue to bring FCPA cases.

The 1970s and capital formation

The FCPA was the signature securities bill enacted into law during Carter’s presidency, although several other legislative efforts are notable. Carter signed into law several sets of amendments to the governing law of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation regarding the structure of its board and the amount of protection available to the customers of broker-dealers (1978 and 1980).

Carter also signed into law a bill that amended the Investment Company Act to spur more investment in small businesses, one of several pieces of legislation he signed into law to address this issue from multiple angles. “This legislation will provide a new statutory framework to streamline legal structures and encourage venture capital to invest in small businesses,” Carter said of the securities bill via a signing statement.

Diversifying the SEC

Finally, Carter made a conscious decision to increase the number of women and people of color he nominated to fill key roles in the federal government, including the courts and regulatory agencies. The SEC was the beneficiary of this effort twice during the Carter Administration.

Carter nominated Roberta Karmel to be the first female commissioner at the SEC. Karmel had worked in the SEC’s New York Office between stints at several prominent law firms. However, when the SEC seat opened that Karmel would fill, Carter sought to nominate someone with significant Wall Street experience to aid the commission’s implementation of the 1975 national market system legislation. Karmel was that person.

In a 2005 oral history recorded by the SEC Historical Society, Karmel, who died in March 2024 at the age of 86, noted how her first job with the SEC was really her backup plan because she was unable to get a job on Wall Street despite stellar educational credentials, although she would recall that working for the SEC was the “best decision” for her legal career.

Electoral politics would come into play for Carter’s nomination of the second woman to be an SEC commissioner. Barbara Thomas Judge was nominated by Carter at the end of his term in office, which meant senators were less than enthusiastic to confirm.

“Well, it was very difficult, because it was the very end of the Carter administration, and basically the Reaganites — the Republicans — didn’t want to confirm any more Carter nominees,” said Thomas Judge in the SEC’s oral history. “The people at the SEC told me, basically, I really should forget it: that I wasn’t going to get confirmed. But I was so thrilled with the idea, I just thought: ‘I can’t give this up without a fight.’”

Thomas Judge described how she insisted on meeting Republican members of the Senate banking committee and that she delivered the message to them that she was a self-described “conservative Democrat,” who was “not political” but “was very academic.” She was confirmed.

Bipartisan tributes to Carter were numerous in the days after his passing. Most tributes, however, emphasized Carter the man rather than Carter the president who had signed into law significant securities law reforms and who had diversified the SEC. 

The true test of how any modern president exerts power over the SEC traditionally focuses on their nomination of commissioners and the selection of a chair, who will pursue an administration’s broad financial markets policy goals, even if there is a tension between what the administration currently in office wants, what Congress wants, and what the SEC’s independent expertise suggests is needed.

Carter’s “hands-off” relationship with the SEC followed a path that would be trod by others after he left office but which occasionally has been tested.


Tags: Anti-CorruptionSEC
Previous Post

Corporate Ethics & Culture Face New Tests in Trump’s America

Next Post

Practical Tips & Considerations for External Investigations

Mark S. Nelson

Mark S. Nelson

Mark S. Nelson, J.D., is a senior legal analyst at Wolters Kluwer, with more than 20 years of experience analyzing and explaining securities regulations and the laws in several adjacent practice areas, including blockchain law, ESG disclosure and banking law. Mark has been a featured speaker on securities law topics in numerous webinars and has published over 50 whitepapers and other strategic briefings on a multitude of securities law and adjacent topics. 

Related Posts

disruption concept logs split

The Devil You Know …

by Carrie Pallardy
June 4, 2025

With compliance processes driven largely by regulatory requirements, the financial services sector could be forgiven for breathing a sigh of...

sec building sign

What to Expect From Atkins-Led SEC

by Jaclyn Jaeger
May 6, 2025

Former Bush-era commissioner returns with mission to streamline regulations and enhance capital markets

serious fraud office website

The Carrot and the Stick: UK’s SFO Clarifies Self-Reporting Benefits for Corporate Offenders

by Jonathan Armstrong and Vivien Yanni Gan
May 5, 2025

New director promises faster investigations and clearer outcomes for organizations that proactively disclose bribery offenses

doj exterior sign

‘At Times of Stress, People Make Stupid Decisions’: Why FCPA Interlude Demands Greater Vigilance

by Esther D’Amico
April 22, 2025

Training and communication remain critical as future of anti-corruption enforcement is murky

Next Post
binoculars peeking through screen

Practical Tips & Considerations for External Investigations

No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy | AI Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Research
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • CCI Magazine
    • Writing for CCI
    • Career Connection
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Library
    • Download Whitepapers & Reports
    • Download eBooks
    • New: Living Your Best Compliance Life by Mary Shirley
    • New: Ethics and Compliance for Humans by Adam Balfour
    • 2021: Raise Your Game, Not Your Voice by Lentini-Walker & Tschida
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
    • Great Women in Compliance
    • Unless: The Podcast (Hemma Lomax)
  • Research
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2025 Corporate Compliance Insights