Wednesday, January 20, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

How Leaders Make Decisions in the Face of Ambiguity

The Genesis of Conspiracy Theories and 5 Typical Wrong Turns

by Linda Henman
May 29, 2019
in Featured, Leadership and Career
heavy fog surrounding the Burj Khalifa, the world's tallest building

The way a leader responds amid uncertainty says a lot about his or her tolerance for ambiguity. Linda Henman explains why those who enjoy an element of ambiguity make decisions differently than those who can’t tolerate it.

Most humans hate ambiguity, and as Nat King Cole once said, “That’s a natural fact.” While most would choose to avoid uncertainty, a select few embrace it. The problem occurs when those who don’t welcome ambiguity lack the information they need to understand what’s going on — especially during times of rapid change. The absence of information causes people to make things up, and a conspiracy theory is born. When leaders understand this phenomenon and their own tolerance for ambiguity, they can communicate more effectively, thereby fostering trust, conveying respect and building cohesive efforts. Here’s a way to think about ambiguity and decision-making:

Decisiveness under pressure requires a high tolerance for ambiguity. When people tolerate or even appreciate ambiguity, they demonstrate the ability to synthesize. As you might recall from chemistry, synthesis is the production of a substance from simpler materials after a chemical reaction. During a time of change, leaders need to serve as catalysts for the chemical reaction.

Decisive leaders who have low tolerance for ambiguity can aggregate data. That is, they can make decisions based on loosely associated fragments of information. This works under ordinary circumstances, but most leaders find very little about developing a new strategy ordinary.

The analyst doesn’t fare so well amid the chaos of major change initiatives. Their tendency toward indecision, coupled with their intolerance of ambiguity, often explains why conspiracy theories surface. When decision-makers don’t really understand their own reasons for doing things and they become mired in analysis paralysis, others rush to fill in the gaps with whatever bits of information or rumors they may stumble across.

Theorists, those who enjoy an element of ambiguity but who find decision-making daunting, won’t do much better. Given enough time, they can make the right call, but once again, opportunities appear and disappear quickly. So do the rumors. While these decision-makers dawdle, those around them hurry.

In Landing in the Executive Chair, I introduced the term F2 Leader to describe leaders who balance fairness and firmness and model effective leadership during most situations. However, not all F2 Leaders have what it takes to make tough calls in those situations when ambiguity haunts from the moment they decide to take a different strategic direction until the ink dries on the contracts – and beyond.

In these high-ambiguity situations, I find that leaders too often opt for what I call the “five typical wrong turns.” One of these usually explains why things didn’t go as hoped.

The 5 Typical Wrong Turns

  1. A Focus on Process Over Results – Too often, leaders become ego-involved with their tactics, defending them, even when a mountain of data suggests they don’t work anymore. Usually, this kind of wrong-minded focus causes a temporary setback.
  2. A Preference for Popularity Over Respect – Most people want to be liked but leaders don’t get paid to be liked; they get paid for results. When they don’t hold people accountable, or when they fail to make tough calls, they give people reason not to respect them, which usually makes these same people not like them. This drips of irony.
  3. A Penchant for Perfection, Not Success – I encourage my clients to move when they’re 80 percent ready, because the time and money required for reaching 100 percent won’t compensate for lost productivity. Of course, some things must be accurate and precise; one side of a door jamb can’t differ from the other side by even a fraction of an inch. But those in the C-suite left those kinds of decisions to others years prior to their promotions.
  4. Choosing Quick Fixes Over Goal Accomplishment – As much as I champion speed in decision-making, I don’t advocate settling for the wrong decision. In a crisis, leaders want to reduce pain for themselves and others in their companies, so they opt for the quick fix. This action may look decisive and courageous, but without good judgment, it can be reckless. Honing good judgment involves keeping the long-term consequences for every major decision in view.
  5. Seeking Harmony at the Expense of Problem-Solving – People who over value popularity frequently also gloss over conflict. They shy away from debate, even though challenging themselves to do so leads to better decisions. When leaders make good hiring decisions and then fail to listen to those smart people, disagree with them and encourage them to differ with each other, they metaphorically leave smarts on the table — along with the money that better decisions would have engendered.

Each of these wrong turns involves a decision or a series of decisions that takes the leader and others in the organization down the wrong paths. These won’t always be roads to perdition, but leaders who stay on them too often or too much find they have ended up where they never intended to go.

You can usually trace conspiracy theories to one of these wrong turns, too. During times of change, people want to know the “why” behind the decision. If leaders provide the rationale behind their decisions, they can reduce uncertainty for the people who work for and with them. Communication — verbal, nonverbal, concrete, specific messages — provides the key to unlocking success, high morale and productivity. It will also quash the conspiracy theories.


Tags: change managementdecision-making
Previous Post

How Much Will a Corporate Monitorship Cost?

Next Post

Leveraging AI to Proactively Detect, Track and Minimize Data Loss Threats

Linda Henman

Dr. Linda Henman is one of those rare experts who can say she’s a coach, consultant, speaker, and author. For more than 30 years, she has worked with Fortune 500 Companies and small businesses that want to think strategically, grow dramatically, promote intelligently, and compete successfully today and tomorrow. Some of her clients include Emerson Electric, Boeing, Avon and Tyson Foods. She was one of eight experts who worked directly with John Tyson after his company’s acquisition of International Beef Products, one of the most successful acquisitions of the twentieth century. Linda holds a Ph.D. in organizational systems and two Master of Arts degrees in both interpersonal communication and organization development and a Bachelor of Science degree in communication. Whether coaching executives or members of the board, Linda offers clients coaching and consulting solutions that are pragmatic in their approach and sound in their foundation—all designed to create exceptional organizations. She is the author of Landing in the Executive Chair: How to Excel in the Hot Seat, The Magnetic Boss: How to Become the Leader No One Wants to Leave, and contributing editor and author to Small Group Communication, among other works. Dr. Henman can be reached at linda@henmanperformancegroup.com.

Related Posts

silhouette of businesspeople in meeting with blue cyber background

Cyber Risk Quantification and Prioritization is the Future of GRC

January 20, 2021
miniature airplane on global currency

FinCEN’s Proposed Changes to the Recordkeeping and Travel Rule Thresholds

January 20, 2021
man working on smartphone and laptop

Adverse Media Screening: Relying on Google Alone Can Expose Organizations to Risk

January 19, 2021
hand showing three fingers on gray background

A Culture of Compliance: The 3 R’s

January 19, 2021
Next Post
illustration of iceberg with portion underwater representing deep/dark web

Leveraging AI to Proactively Detect, Track and Minimize Data Loss Threats

Access realtime data

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management culture of ethics cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights