Sunday, December 15, 2019
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Industry News
  • Jobs
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Governance

5 Essential Improvements to Corporate Governance

by Michael Volkov
August 22, 2014
in Governance
5 Essential Improvements to Corporate Governance

This article was republished with permission from Michael Volkov’s blog, Corruption, Crime & Compliance.

Continuing with my list theme for the week, it is important to remind everyone that a culture of compliance begins with the Board of Directors, filters to the CEO who commits to promoting ethics and compliance in the company and finishes with a fabric of ethics and compliance that is built on trust and integrity.

I recognize I have said more than a mouthful, but it is important to keep everything in perspective. In the absence of a Board committed to ethics and compliance, a company’s culture is doomed to die on the vine and increase operational risks for the company. CCOs know this and sometimes they keep plugging along, knowing that they are likely to run into frustrating brick walls.

When it comes to corporate Boards, there are several important issues that I commonly observe in the ethics and compliance space. These include:

  1. Lack of Board Education and Training: Too often, CEOs and CCOs are unwilling to tackle the ethics and compliance issues head on and educate the Board on the nuances to some very important risks. Instead, they often sit back and rely on the Board members’ own experiences in other companies or in prior senior leadership positions to push the Board to understand and face important risks. For example, I often observe that one Board member will educate the other Board members based on their own experiences as to certain risks. By failing to face the issues head on, the CEOs and CCOs usually miss an important opportunity to outline the risks and the importance of compliance strategies.
  2. Audit Committee Obsession with Financials: The audit committees of companies have an important duty under Sarbanes-Oxley to ensure the accuracy of company financials and to maintaining a robust system of internal controls. It is a very important responsibility and one that should continue even when the audit committee has responsibility for the company’s compliance program. However, the priorities are usually out of skew, meaning 80 percent of the audit committee’s efforts and attention are focused on financials without proper regard for the importance of ethics and compliance. There is no magic formula for success in this area – some companies have established a separate risk and compliance committee, but that does not guarantee success – the issue always boils down to one question: does the company’s Board understand the significance of ethics and compliance to the overall success of the company?
  3. Requiring Candid and In-Depth CCO Reports: Corporate Boards often like to hear “happy talk” reports and CCOs take their cues from the Boards’ expectations. If the Board is committed to an honest reporting system, one that fleshes out the strengths and weaknesses of ongoing compliance, the company and the CCO will step up to the challenge. Corporate Boards that insist on a real and candid dialogue from the CCO are far and few between. Hopefully, this will change as corporate governance systems are being challenged.
  4. Improving Quality of Compliance Information: Board members read materials provided to them in advance of a Board meeting. CCOs are often too busy to give careful consideration to the information they provide the Board on a regular basis, and most importantly, prior to a Board meeting. CCOs have to look for opportunities to communicate with the Board as a way to educate and gain support from them. CCOs often fear that negative information about the company’s compliance program reflects poorly on them and jeopardizes their position in the company. To the contrary, a fair and honest written report prior to the Board meeting is critical to gaining the Board’s understanding and support on important issues.
  5. Build Personal Alliances: A company treats the corporate Board like “superstars” and are reluctant to humanize individual Board members. What a mistake. CCOs have to reach out to the Board members, seek time with them on an informal basis for coffee, lunch or regular conversations. People are people, and they put their pants or dresses on in the same way that the CCO does. There is no need to idolize or treat Board members as high and mighty; they are people too and they have the same experiences as CCOs. It is important for CCOs to build personal relationships with the Board members to facilitate informal communications and enhance relationships.

Tags: anti-corruptionthird party risk management
Previous Post

Managing the Shadow Cloud

Next Post

Privacy and Data Protection: The View from Europe

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan

Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at [email protected].

Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

businessman sitting on stage addressing auditorium

How ESG Trends Impact Corporate Governance and Compliance

November 26, 2019
view of businessman from the back looking at city skyline

Top Risks & Governance Strategies for the Less than Fortune 1000 Company

November 25, 2019
miniature people standing on coins beside wooden blocks spelling AML

The Board’s Role in AML Compliance

November 4, 2019
green shamrock on wood background

The Implications of Technology on the Workplace

October 22, 2019
Next Post
Privacy and Data Protection: The View from Europe

Privacy and Data Protection: The View from Europe

Free Downloads

OFAC whitepaper cover
Compliance Job Interview Q&A
Reputation Risk Management Research

RSS SEC Litigation News

  • John Special, Defendant, and Michael Murphy, Relief Defendant, John Kenneth Davidson December 12, 2019
    SEC Obtains $3 Million Settlement in Insider Trading Action
  • Palm Beach Atlantic Financial Group, LLC and William A. Smith December 11, 2019
    SEC Charges Florida Resident and His Corporate Entity for Fraudulent Securities Offerings
  • Nanotech Engineering, Inc., Michael James Sweaney (also known as Michael Hatton), David Sweaney, and Jeffery Gange December 11, 2019
    SEC Obtains Asset Freeze to Halt Alleged Offering Fraud

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks Big Data blockchain board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management corporate culture corporate governance culture of ethics cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making Dodd-Frank DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions GDPR GRC HIPAA information security internal audit internet of things (IoT) KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • Audit
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • HR Compliance
  • Leadership and Career
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights